Write an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) document for a technical decision. Use when documenting a technical choice, architectural decision, or design decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
677 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) document for a technical decision. Use when documenting a technical choice, architectural decision, or design decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level mathematical logic knowledge. Use when working with propositional logic, first-order logic, proof theory, model theory, computability theory, Godel incompleteness theorems, set theory, type theory, or formal verification. Also use when the user mentions 'formal proof', 'Godel', 'incompleteness', 'Turing machine', 'decidability', 'Zermelo-Fraenkel', 'axiom of choice', 'model theory', 'completeness theorem', 'computability', 'formal language', or 'type theory'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves typography by fixing font choices, hierarchy, sizing, weight, and readability so text feels intentional. Use when the user mentions fonts, type, readability, text hierarchy, sizing looks off, or wants more polished, intentional typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map existing materials into a first knowledge record, or investigate a subject's history in depth. Use whenever the user asks to map, survey, go through, reconstruct or investigate what already exists - folders of documents, decision records, meeting notes, emails, exports, code - or wants a starting record built from existing materials, even when the word 'record' is never said: consult this before listing or reading the files yourself, because a map has an agreed scope, a protocol and a report. Also, once, at a suitable moment, to offer the starting choices where a workspace has no record and the work is clearly ongoing - never on a greeting. Learning while working needs no map. Requests come in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture decisions, trade-off analysis, and ADR authoring. Trigger when a significant technical decision needs to be made, documented, and owned — not when an implementation detail needs a choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check proposed stack, data flows, cloud choices, and delivery controls against declared enterprise policies, compliance frameworks, and security controls. Trigger at R2/R3 risk classification, before locking architecture decisions, or when the operating profile names a governance pointer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding. Trigger on any high-stakes decision, architecture choice, or before marking work complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when stakeholders pull a decision in different directions — frames each lens, builds a trade-off matrix, surfaces the cost of every choice — even if the user just says 'PO and ops disagree'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to audit a past architectural decision — did the chosen option hold up, what assumptions drifted, should the ADR be superseded? Backward review only; does not lock new choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create stunning, animation-rich HTML presentations from scratch or by converting PowerPoint files. Use when the user wants to build a presentation, convert a PPT/PPTX to web, or create slides for a talk/pitch. Helps non-designers discover their aesthetic through visual exploration rather than abstract choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect project brief and stack choices, then output canonical project-config.json for downstream web-builder skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find, build, evaluate, and improve systems using decision models. Use for bounded classification, routing, ranking, Choice/Score/Noul, decision-model composition, evaluation harnesses, prompt/program hill climbing, and Software 3.0 workflows across software, business, organizations, and life. Separate models, code, and human judgment. TypeSafe Jev is the default hosted exemplar. Not for straightforward arithmetic, prose rewriting, or provider setup alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape every agent comment as a short typed brief the owner can triage in seconds — 🔴 issue · 💡 proposal · ✅ done · 🔀 choice · 🛠 action · 👀 review — with all the depth collapsed behind it. Enforced by the require-owner-brief hook. Use before posting ANY GitHub comment as an agent, or when asked to "make this shorter", "brief me", "just tell me what I need to do".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior System Architect for SaaS specifications. Security-first design with ISO 27001 compliance. Use for system architecture, tech specs, API design, technology choices, distributed systems, cloud infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct reproducible web searches and decision-oriented research across official sites, search engines, news, papers, forums, social platforms, and public datasets. Use when Codex must investigate a person, organization, product, market, technical resource, reputation, career choice, or other current topic; compare candidates; verify claims; collect dated citations; distinguish facts from inference and anecdote; or write an evidence-backed research report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves typography by fixing font choices, hierarchy, sizing, weight, and readability so text feels intentional. Use when the user mentions fonts, type, readability, text hierarchy, sizing looks off, or wants more polished, intentional typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves typography by fixing font choices, hierarchy, sizing, weight, and readability so text feels intentional. Use when the user mentions fonts, type, readability, text hierarchy, sizing looks off, or wants more polished, intentional typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work through which package to add for a capability, and what each option costs — maintenance, licence, bundle weight, transitive risk, and whether the platform already does it. Use when someone needs a library for a job and has not picked one yet, when weighing two candidates, or when a package looks convenient but unmaintained.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Große Kandidatenlisten durch optionale Themen-Pfützen, Filterstufen und wiederholt neu gemischte Bündel schrittweise reduzieren. Nutzen, wenn der User Skills, Aufgaben, Ideen, Dateien oder andere Einträge gruppenweise auswählen, nach Merkmalen filtern oder nur innerhalb gemeinsamer Themenbereiche mischen will, ohne übrige Einträge endgültig zu verwerfen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a WooCommerce-style AJAX product search select (the selectWoo / wooselect dropdown) — class="wc-product-search" + the data-action attribute pointing to woocommerce_json_search_products (products only) or woocommerce_json_search_products_and_variations (products AND variations, often the right choice). Pre-selected items rendered server-side as <option selected> via wc_get_product() + get_formatted_name(); WC's wc-enhanced-select script auto-enqueued on WC admin screens, explicit enqueue required on non-WC pages. Solves the "load 20k products into a select" antipattern AI assistants commonly emit. Use when adding a product picker meta box, a custom WC admin page selector, or any UI where the user must search and pick from many products. Triggers on wc-product-search, woocommerce_json_search_products, woocommerce_json_search_products_and_variations, selectWoo, wc-enhanced-select, "select2 products in WooCommerce", or product-picker meta box scaffolding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and interpret TypeSafe Jev decision requests in NV oOS — typed choice/score/noul questions, batching, confidence thresholds, composite scoring, and guardrails. Use when classifying, routing, scoring, or safety-screening content with the typesafe_decide or typesafe_guardrail tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "pick a bid strategy", "set a tCPA/tROAS target", or "plan the learning-phase entry"; produces a bid-strategy choice (tCPA / tROAS / max-conversions / manual CPC), the starting target math, a portfolio grouping map, and a learning-phase entry plan. Not for splitting the budget across campaigns — use budget-optimizer; not for in-flight pacing/scale moves — use budget-pacing-monitor; not for scoring the account — use ad-account-auditor. 出价策略/tCPA目标/tROAS/学习期
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Foundation for writing Estuary derivations — what they are, language choice (SQL/TypeScript/Python), project layout, flowctl workflow, stateless vs stateful shuffling, and universal gotchas. Read this before any other derivation-* skill. Use when user says "write a derivation", "how do derivations work", "create a derivation", "derivation setup", or before starting any transformation work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。