1,317 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, confidence scoring, and command validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CUMCM 国赛、MCM/ICM 美赛与电工杯数学建模竞赛的端到端协作工作流。Use when a user explicitly works on one of these modeling contests or asks to run/review a modeling-competition paper from problem selection through modeling, solving, robustness, writing, compliance, and final submission review. Provides 10 stages, persistent decision state, competition-specific rules/templates, deterministic scoring helpers, numbered decisions, and Codex/Claude Code handoff. Do not trigger for generic model selection, ordinary data analysis, or non-competition paper review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your personal DSA & LeetCode mentor. Use for problem explanations, progressive hints, code reviews, mock interviews, pattern recognition, complexity analysis, and custom problem generation. Automatically adapts to your learning style and request type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create Chinese monospaced compass-style PDCA or CAPD problem-solving cards using East-West-South-North-Center layout, full-width and half-width spaces, diagonal Unicode arrows, and strict Chinese character limits. Use when Codex needs to turn a problem, incident, decision tradeoff, root-cause analysis, improvement cycle, or CAPD/PDCA workflow into a square text diagram, Hermes/Discord-ready card, or Chinese 方位九宮圖 with center ◎, north Plan, east Do, south Check, west Action, and four diagonal transition arrows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert FIRE analysis cards, Chinese knowledge notes, or project-note JSON into validated EPUB books with directory cards, chapter cards, keyword index cards, backlinks, and GitHub-shareable ebook assets. Use when Codex needs to teach or automate the path from `fire-analysis-card` outputs to `project-note-json-to-epub` style EPUB files, including sample JSON manuscripts and attached `.epub` deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instruments code to track the flow of untrusted or sensitive data at runtime, enabling detection of injection vulnerabilities, data leaks, and privilege violations. Use when users need to: (1) Track untrusted input propagation through code, (2) Detect SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vulnerabilities, (3) Identify sensitive data leaks, (4) Monitor privilege escalation paths, (5) Perform dynamic taint analysis for security testing. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable taint sources and sinks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify bug-introducing commits using semantic analysis that extends traditional SZZ algorithm. Distinguishes semantic changes from refactorings or code movements using control-flow and data-flow similarity analysis. Use when analyzing bug-fix commits to trace back to bug-introducing changes, investigating software evolution, conducting empirical studies on defect prediction, or reducing false positives in bug localization. Supports git repositories and provides explanations for why commits are identified as bug-introducing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes secure remediation strategies for detected security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks, insecure deserialization, improper authentication, and unsafe cryptographic usage. Provides recommended security checks, safer API alternatives, design-level changes, code examples, trade-off analysis, and prioritized remediation plans. Does NOT automatically modify code unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically updates regression tests based on interval analysis to maintain coverage of key program intervals. Use when code changes affect value ranges, conditionals, or control flow, and existing tests need updating to maintain interval coverage. Analyzes interval information from updated code, identifies coverage gaps, adjusts test inputs and assertions, removes redundant tests, and generates new tests for uncovered intervals. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with various test frameworks (pytest, JUnit, Jest, Google Test).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically infer loop invariants for code verification and correctness proofs. Use when analyzing loops to identify properties that hold throughout execution, generating assertions for verification, proving loop correctness, or documenting loop behavior. Supports Python, Java, C/C++, and language-agnostic analysis. Generates invariants as code assertions (assert statements). Triggers when users ask to infer invariants, find loop properties, generate loop assertions, prove loop correctness, or verify loop behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs abstract interpretation over source code to infer possible program states, variable ranges, and data properties without executing the program. Reports potential runtime errors including out-of-bounds accesses, null dereferences, type inconsistencies, division by zero, and integer overflows. Use when analyzing code for potential runtime errors, performing static analysis, checking safety properties, or verifying program behavior without execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify the precise location of bugs in source code, modules, and systems. Use this skill when debugging applications, investigating test failures, analyzing error reports, tracing runtime issues, or performing root cause analysis. Analyzes stack traces, error messages, failing tests, and code patterns to pinpoint buggy functions, classes, files, or modules with confidence rankings and supporting evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and enable security-oriented Xcode build settings, compiler warnings, static analysis, and Enhanced Security features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google Gemini CLI for second opinions, architectural advice, code reviews, security audits. Leverage 1M+ context for comprehensive codebase analysis via command-line tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Xquik to fetch X (Twitter) data or act through a connected account. It covers search, profiles, followers, replies, threads, timelines, media downloads, bulk exports, trends, monitors, signed webhooks, draws, posts, likes, follows, DMs, and AI analysis of posts (sentiment, brand mentions, news, market signals, viral score, custom labels). Also use for hashtag or @handle tracking when no other network is named, Xquik MCP setup, pricing, and X API comparisons. Skip data from other social networks, code that stays on the official X API (such as tweepy with an X developer bearer token), official X widget implementation, and content drafting or analysis without an API task. Not affiliated with X Corp.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end CLIP-seq pipeline from FASTQ to ENCODE-compliant binding sites, single-nucleotide crosslink maps, annotation, motifs, and (optionally) differential binding. Use when running the full Yeo lab eCLIP / iCLIP / iCLIP2 / iCLIP3 / irCLIP / PAR-CLIP analysis with SMInput control, protocol-specific UMI extraction, ENCODE STAR parameters, CLIPper or Skipper peak calling with stringent log2 FC and -log10 p thresholds, IDR rescue and self-consistency QC, and downstream motif registration with mCross or PEKA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A terminal-native marketing system rendered entirely in Berkeley Mono — every word on the page, from the hero headline down to the footer fine print, is monospaced. The page itself reads like a manpage or a static-site README: warm cream canvas (`#fdfcfc`), nearly-black ink (`#201d1d`), 4px-radius rectangles for the few interactive elements, and bracketed `[+]`/`[-]` ASCII markers used as bullets. The brand's only "visual moment" is a single dark hero card that mocks up the OpenCode TUI itself — black background, monospaced terminal output, ASCII pipe characters, and a wordmark rendered as block-pixel ASCII. Every section sits as a hairline-bordered text block on the cream canvas with no shadows, no gradients, no decorative imagery, and no non-monospaced character anywhere in the system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。