1,327 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Quality assurance specialist for security, performance, accessibility, comprehensive testing, and quality standard alignment. Use for test, review, security audit, OWASP, coverage, lint work, and ISO/IEC 25010 or ISO/IEC 29119-aligned QA recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether tests earn their maintenance cost and which suite owns each contract. Use when pruning redundant tests, investigating implementation coupling or test-only production hooks, reviewing the value of proposed coverage, or auditing an entire subsystem. Use write-tests to implement the resulting test changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex-native Amazon PPC setup workflow using Kunze's broader ecosystem-driven strategy. Use when the user wants LaunchFast-driven bulk-sheet generation with broad and phrase coverage, gap analysis, and a campaign package written to disk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract structured specifications from electronic component datasheet PDFs — pinouts, electrical characteristics, peripherals, topology, and features. Cache extractions per project for consumption by schematic and PCB analyzers. Primary consumer infrastructure for `kicad`, `emc`, `spice`, and `thermal` analyzers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to extract, verify, or read specs from a component datasheet; when analyzers need verified IC knowledge (EN pin thresholds, PG presence, USB peripheral speed); or when a review mentions datasheet coverage, extraction quality, or per-MPN specifications. Also triggers on "extract this datasheet", "what are the specs for MPN X", "verify datasheet extraction", or "check pin functions for part Y".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes Vitest tests following project patterns: __tests__/ directories, vi.mock() for module mocking with vi.hoisted() for test-time factories, global LLM mock from src/test/setup.ts, environment variable save/restore in beforeEach/afterEach, vi.clearAllMocks() lifecycle, and test file organization. Use when user says 'write tests', 'add test coverage', 'test this', creates *.test.ts files, or when test failures appear in CI. Do NOT use for non-test code or for debugging without writing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing a new Spark expression in DataFusion Comet. Walks through cloning latest Spark master to study the canonical implementation, checking the upstream datafusion-spark crate before writing native code, building the Comet serde and Rust wire-up from the contributor guide, then running audit-comet-expression to drive a test-coverage iteration loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate URLs and tools — check vault coverage, assess relevance, recommend save or skip
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AISTATS submission against AI, machine-learning, statistics, and uncertainty literature, including arXiv preprints, workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, PMLR archival status, and the two-community citation coverage that AISTATS reviewers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and reinforcement-learning literature spread across AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and JAAMAS, including arXiv and workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, and the cross-community citation coverage AAMAS reviewers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when systematically gathering, coding, and synthesizing a management/organization literature for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the search-and-coverage methodology and the choice of narrative vs. systematic vs. bibliometric integration. Builds the corpus and synthesis notes; it does not impose the organizing spine (amann-organizing-framework) or write prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or redesign the framework from scratch (amann-organizing-framework).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose Meta Ads campaign performance and account gaps using Meta's actual system mechanics — including customer-journey coverage, Breakdown Effect, Learning Phase, Auction Overlap, Pacing, and Creative Fatigue. Use for performance diagnosis, account audits, full-funnel or TOF/MOF/BOF gap analysis, deciding what to test or create next, and producing novice-friendly recommendations without forcing every campaign or ad into a funnel stage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assembles genomes de novo from noisy long reads (Oxford Nanopore R9/R10/Dorado, PacBio CLR) with Flye (repeat graph), Canu (correct-trim-assemble OLC), NextDenovo, Shasta, Raven, wtdbg2, or miniasm, and reconciles bacterial assemblies into a consensus with Trycycler/Autocycler. Covers matching the input flag to the basecaller era (--nano-hq vs --nano-raw), why a raw long-read assembly is contiguous but low-QV and not finished until polished, haplotig false-duplication and purge_dups, coverage and read-N50 as non-substitutable inputs, and mid-read adapter de-chimerization. Use when assembling a bacterial or eukaryotic genome from ONT or PacBio noisy reads, choosing a long-read assembler, or diagnosing an over-collapsed or duplicated assembly. For PacBio HiFi use hifi-assembly instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predict peptide-MHC class I binding and natural presentation with MHCflurry, NetMHCpan-4.1, and MixMHCpred to nominate candidate CD8 T-cell epitopes. Covers the binding-affinity (BA) vs eluted-ligand (EL/presentation) distinction, why %Rank beats raw nM for cross-allele work, the MS abundance bias that misranks low-expression neoantigens, allele-coverage inequity, and length bias. Use when scanning a protein or peptide set for class I epitopes, scoring neoantigen candidates, or choosing a binding predictor. For CD4/HLA class II see mhc-class-ii-prediction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-seq (DRS) signal using m6Anet (multiple-instance-learning over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the upstream pipeline (Dorado/Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 map-ont -> nanopolish eventalign -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability including the mod_ratio stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads/site), multi-condition comparison via xPore/Nanocompore/ELIGOS, Dorado native modification calling (RNA004, 2024+), and the cDNA-vs-DRS distinction (cDNA Nanopore CANNOT detect modifications). Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting probability_modified vs mod_ratio vs per-read probabilities, deciding between m6Anet (known DRACH sites) and Dorado/Remora (genome-wide screening), pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller versions, or troubleshooting eventalign/dataprep failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows), MACS3/MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal validation (miCLIP/GLORI/m6A-SAC-seq/m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against single-base methods, interpreting 5' peaks where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a consensus strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assigns GO terms, Pfam/InterPro domains, KEGG orthologs, EC numbers, and product names to predicted proteins using eggNOG-mapper (orthology), InterProScan (domain signatures), and KofamScan (KEGG), routing specialized functions to dbCAN/antiSMASH/AMRFinderPlus/SignalP. Covers the orthology-vs-domain-vs-homology paradigms, the annotation-error percolation cascade, domain-presence-is-not-function, GO IEA circularity in enrichment, evidence tiering, and bit-score/coverage thresholds. Use when adding functional annotation to predicted genes, choosing between eggNOG-mapper and InterProScan, or judging how much to trust a functional label.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assembles haplotype-resolved diploid and telomere-to-telomere (T2T) genomes from PacBio HiFi reads with hifiasm (HiFi-only, Hi-C, or trio phasing) and verkko (HiFi + ultralong ONT for T2T), extracting contigs from GFA and routing phasing QC to k-mer/trio metrics. Covers why a primary assembly is a haplotype mosaic that exists in no cell, partial-vs-full phasing (the .bp. vs .dip. filename convention), the purge-default trap on inbred samples, the --hom-cov coverage-estimate alarm, and verkko-vs-hifiasm for T2T. Use when assembling a diploid eukaryote from HiFi, phasing haplotypes with parents (trio) or Hi-C, deciding whether to chase T2T, or diagnosing switch errors invisible to N50/BUSCO/QV.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。