「decisions」の検索結果

A platform decision framework for experimentation. When to use Statsig vs PostHog vs GrowthBook vs Optimizely vs Amplitude vs Eppo vs Kameleoon. How to migrate between them. How to coordinate when multi-platform is genuinely warranted. The decisions that compound for years and the ones you can defer. Triggers on which experimentation platform, choose Statsig vs PostHog, evaluate experimentation tools, switch experimentation platform, migrate from Optimizely, consolidate experimentation tools, multi-platform experimentation, experimentation platform decision, ab test platform selection, feature flag platform vs experiment platform, warehouse-native experiments, vendor lock-in experimentation. Also triggers when a team is asking about cost, governance, or migration cost across experimentation tools, or when an evaluation is starting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic content refresh discipline. Quarterly audits, refresh prioritization (which pieces, when, how deep), refresh-vs-merge-vs-delete decisions, the lifecycle that distinguishes intentional refresh from set-and-forget decay. Builds on the refresh sections of pillar-content-architecture and editorial-qa with a program-level discipline. Triggers on content refresh, content decay, content audit, refresh prioritization, content lifecycle, refresh strategy, traffic decay, ranking drop, content freshness, evergreen content, content maintenance. Also triggers when traffic is eroding silently across an aging content library, when teams cannot decide which pieces to refresh, or when refresh work is happening but the impact is unclear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A discipline for designing experiments (A/B tests, multivariate, holdouts) so the results actually answer the question you asked. Hypothesis writing, sample size, duration, segment analysis, running discipline, matching a result to a pre-committed decision rule, and the common failure modes that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is planning a test that has not run yet: framing a hypothesis, sizing the sample, setting duration, choosing guardrails, or deciding whether something is worth testing at all. Triggers on design an experiment, experiment plan, A/B test, split test, multivariate test, holdout, experiment hypothesis, sample size, minimum detectable effect, MDE, test duration, guardrail metric, no peeking, pre-committed decision rule, is this worth testing. Use `experimentation-analytics` instead when the test has already run and the question is how to read the result panel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk the user through four directional axes (tone register, aesthetic philosophy, audience relationship, sensory ambition) and produce a structured aesthetic brief that downstream content, copy, design, and art-direction skills consume as required input. The aesthetic depth layer, distinct from `creative-brief` (operational kickoff: scope, audience, deliverables, constraints). Use when a project needs aesthetic coherence across many small decisions and the user has only a vague feeling, or when multiple downstream aesthetic-producing skills need a shared brief. Triggers on creative direction, aesthetic direction, set the aesthetic, define the visual direction, what's the vibe, what's the tone, the four axes. Does NOT fire for a general kickoff brief (use `creative-brief`), tactical single-piece work, already-documented direction, purely functional output, or locked production-stage work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a ForgeCAD design brief, HLD, or LLD before coding by walking through use, assembly, interfaces, decisions, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design critique with 7 rated passes: Information Architecture, Interaction State Coverage, User Journey and Emotional Arc, AI Slop Risk (10-item blacklist), Design System Alignment, Responsive and Accessibility, Unresolved Decisions. Each rated 0-10 with gap-fill loop. Parallel cross-model design voices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Challenges ideas, plans, decisions, and proposals using structured critical reasoning as devil's advocate, pre-mortem, red team, or evidence audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs high-level system architecture, reviews existing designs, makes architectural decisions, creates architecture diagrams, writes ADRs, evaluates technology trade-offs, and plans for scalability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize performance findings into evidence-backed recommendations and decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn meeting notes into an accountable register — extract decisions, actions and open questions, flag ownerless items, track follow-through. Use when commitments get dropped or a recurring meeting decides nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one-page meeting briefings from structured input (attendees, prior context, decisions needed). Use before customer calls, board meetings, or 1:1s to prepare a pre-read or briefing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze meeting transcripts to extract decisions, action items, owners, due dates, open questions, and risks. Use after recorded meetings, sales calls, customer interviews, or planning sessions, or to build a decision log.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn reflection into decisions by scoring predictions against outcomes and tracking whether commitments held. Use when running a quarterly review, scoring forecast calibration, or reflection keeps producing notes instead of change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured legal risk assessment with 5x5 Severity x Likelihood matrix. Use for risk scoring, risk registers, escalation decisions, and risk memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-functional what-if modeling for compound adversity -- shows how one problem cascades into the next. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or multi-variable threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

C-suite orchestration that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s) and runs multi-role board meetings. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, or resolving cross-department conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds positioning, battlecards, and roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, or updating positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data leadership advisor on data strategy, governance, quality, and platform decisions. Use when defining a data strategy, scoring data maturity, auditing data governance, evaluating a data platform, or designing the data org.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes social media campaign performance across platforms with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and audience insights for data-driven marketing decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the Part 5 client validation document: evidence-cited findings for client decisions. "prepare v1 findings for client review"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search an Agent Relay workspace's shared coding-agent sessions for prior work, decisions, fixes, or the context behind a task or pull request. Use when team history could answer the user's question or prevent repeating an investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。