2,665 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Take a change through a verdaccio/verdaccio pull request — branch, checks, changeset, title, body, labels, draft-to-ready, then the CI and review rounds after every push, plus the port PRs to other release lines. Use when opening a PR, after pushing to one, when a check fails, or when review comments arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, extending, debugging or publishing a Lightweight Charts™ plugin — a custom series, a series primitive or a pane primitive — or when turning a chart idea ("I want the chart to show/draw X") into a working plugin. Covers choosing the plugin type, scaffolding with create-lwc-plugin, building on @tradingview/lwc-toolkit instead of hand-rolled helpers, which of the official plugin packages to read as the reference implementation, where the docs are, and the autoscale, whitespace, visible-range, hit-test and conflation mistakes every plugin author makes once. Reach for it whenever the user mentions a custom series, primitive, renderer, drawing on the chart canvas, lwc-plugin, plugin-examples, the toolkit, or the plugin catalog — even if they never say the word "plugin".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh Codex reviewer with no prior context; base output is same-family provisional. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror). Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a cross-model sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared. Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports — catching hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations. Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render the digest for one provider-research date from every report on disk, topped with authored highlight bullets; publishing is scripts/provider-watch/publish.py's job, run outside this skill
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research every provider behind Pipecat's services for new models and API affordances, writing per-service reports and local branches for clear-cut updates; publishing is scripts/provider-watch/publish.py's job, run outside this skill
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canonical vault merge. Use when the user wants autonomous or deep research that may access the public web. Triggers: /autoresearch, autoresearch, research this topic, deep dive into, investigate, find everything about, research and file, go research, build a wiki on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliberately search, add to, or curate your long-term memory with the `memory` tool — beyond the automatic recall/capture every turn already does. Use when asked who someone is or what they're working on, when you learn a durable fact worth keeping now, or when your notebook holds stale or wrong entries you should clean up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and publish a self-contained HTML page to Superset, then answer the comments readers pin to it. Use this instead of publishing a Claude artifact whenever the reader is a teammate: a page is listed in the org, every publish mints a version, and pinned comments come back to the agent. Use when the user asks to make or publish a page, turn a report, dashboard, chart, doc, or analysis into a shareable link, update or re-version a page already published, or work through comments left on one, including "make me a page for this", "publish this as a page", "share it as a link", "add a version", "address the comments on that page". Also use it unprompted to offer a page when you finish output a teammate will read: a change or PR walkthrough, a comparison, a report or digest, an incident writeup, or verification screenshots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and read mail in Superhuman — the thread where something was said, sent, or promised — by filtering on who, when, and which split before searching by words, reading the thread before answering, and linking the thread behind every claim. Use when the user asks what someone emailed, whether a reply or an invoice ever arrived, what the latest is on a thread, or what is on their calendar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make a repository Superset-ready by authoring .superset/config.json with setup, teardown, and run scripts so every new workspace boots configured, then verifying with a real workspace. Use when the user wants to set up a project or repo for Superset, configure workspace setup scripts, or fix a failing workspace setup ("new workspaces don't have node_modules", "my .env is missing in workspaces", "setup script isn't running").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a recurring chore into a Superset automation. Drafts the agent prompt, confirms the schedule or event trigger and the target, creates it with the CLI, and reviews the first run together. Use when the user wants a scheduled or recurring agent, a daily or weekly job, or an agent that reacts to a Slack message, GitHub pull request, Linear issue, Sentry issue or incoming email, or says things like "every morning do X", "automate this", "set up a cron agent", "run this on a schedule", "when someone opens a PR, do X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write Stripe code against what the API does today — plan the product shape, confirm every parameter from Stripe's own docs and schemas, and keep the agent in a sandbox. Use when adding checkout, billing, subscriptions, invoicing, or webhooks to a codebase, or when debugging Stripe integration code that compiles but behaves wrong.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer "what did we say, decide, or promise" from Granola meeting notes — narrow to the meetings that can hold the answer, read the notes before the transcript, and cite the meeting behind every claim. Use when the user asks what happened in a meeting, what a customer or teammate said, what was decided or promised, or refers to a call, sync, standup, or demo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer "what did we say, decide, or promise" from Circleback meetings — search by attendee, company, tag, or date before keyword, read the notes before the transcript, and cite the meeting behind every claim. Use when the user asks what happened on a call, what a customer or teammate said, what was agreed, or refers to a meeting, sync, demo, or interview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds CARLA on Unreal Engine 5.8 from the ue58-dev branch using its CMake build system — configure a preset, then build the carla-unreal / carla-unreal-editor / carla-python-api-install / launch targets — with ROS 2, DLSS, RSS and cook-scope options, and the engine-side build of the CarlaUnreal UE 5.8 fork. There is no Makefile and no Util/BuildTools in this tree, so every UE4 `make` recipe is invalid here. Use when the user asks to "build CARLA UE5", "build ue58-dev", "compile CARLA with cmake", "rebuild the Python API", or hits a CMake configure or target failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tells you what CARLA on UE 5.5 (branch ue5-dev) cannot do that UE 5.8 (ue58-dev) can, so you do not attempt an unsupported workflow there — no Autoware integration, no ROS 2 middleware choice (FastDDS only), no DLSS or ray-traced-lens camera, no OFPA large-map mount so Town12/13/15 load black, and a few missing World/Actor methods. Also states what is identical, so the ue58 skills can be used directly for everything else. Use when working against a 5.5 checkout, when a ue58 skill's step has no counterpart, or when deciding whether a feature request is possible on 5.5 at all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。