「exit」の検索結果

SEO + Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for 2026 — technical SEO, on-page optimization, structured data (JSON-LD, schema.org), Core Web Vitals, citability scoring (llms.txt, entity clarity), AI search engine optimization (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews), and brand authority building. Use when user asks to optimize a site for search engines, improve SEO, write SEO content, implement structured data, optimize for AI search/GEO, audit a page, or improve Google rankings. Do NOT use for content writing strategy (use content-marketing), performance optimization beyond Core Web Vitals (use performance-profiler), or paid ad strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or running Godot tests - gdUnit4 or GUT (whichever the repo has), unit tests on typed GDScript classes, scene runners for frames, physics, input and signals, headless CLI with --import first, reports and exit codes, and C# tests via gdUnit4Net or plain dotnet test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or running Unreal Engine tests - which test type fits (simple/complex automation tests, Automation Specs, functional tests, CQTest, Low-Level Tests, Gauntlet), naming and filters, latent tests, and the headless UnrealEditor-Cmd run with report export, exit handling and screenshot captures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before any review_criterion approval or column move - the evidence each verdict needs, how to treat skipped, blocked and intermittent cases, and which exit a blocker takes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find, rank, and safely remove accidental codebase complexity by proving real consumers, dynamic entrypoints, compatibility obligations, duplicate representations, speculative surfaces, and lifecycle ownership. Use when asked to simplify or clean up a repository, reclaim code entropy, reduce over-engineering or redundancy, find deletion candidates, collapse duplicate state/APIs, remove dead or added-then-abandoned code beyond static-tool output, or implement an evidence-backed simplification pass in any language or stack. Also trigger for 代码化简、熵回收、删代码、清理冗余、收敛抽象、去除过度设计. Do not use as a performance audit unless simplification is the stated goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec CLI surface area before implementation - command tree, flags, exit codes, I/O contract. Use when designing or planning a CLI interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated iterative agent runner for spec-based development in Kiro. Wraps kiro-cli in a self-correcting bash loop that picks up tasks from a Kiro spec, implements them one at a time, verifies against exit criteria, and accumulates corrections and codebase patterns across iterations. Use this skill when the user mentions "ralph loop", "ralph", "spec loop", "iterative spec runner", "run my spec tasks automatically", "kiro spec automation", "self-correcting agent loop", "implement spec tasks in a loop", "run kiro-cli in a loop", "automated task implementation", or wants to drive a Kiro spec to completion through repeated agent iterations. Also use when the user wants to set up, configure, troubleshoot, or understand the Ralph Loop workflow — including progress tracking, corrections, codebase patterns, timing logs, and the summary dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI-generated responses and LLM citations (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Claude, Gemini). Use when the user mentions 'GEO', 'AEO', 'AI SEO', 'LLM optimization', 'citation rate', 'AI visibility', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'roundup pages', or wants to audit pages for AI discoverability. Includes terminology alignment, FAQ schemas, and community signal strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), and GEO strategy for search engines and AI visibility. Use when working on "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "on-page SEO," "AI search optimization," "AEO," "GEO," "AI visibility," "optimize for ChatGPT," "optimize for Perplexity," "AI Overviews," "answer engine optimization," "generative engine optimization," "AI citations," "featured snippets," "meta tags," "schema markup," "search ranking," "content optimization," "E-E-A-T," "structured data," "search console," "SEO health check," "why am I not ranking," "AI search readiness," "backlink strategy," "link building," "domain authority," "programmatic SEO," "SEO at scale," "template-based SEO," "AEO monitoring," "AI search monitoring," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "SERP analysis," "search intent," "site architecture," "information architecture," "URL structure," "internal linking," or "navigation." For keyword research, see keyword-research-and-clustering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove a deploy landed — the served revision is the commit you meant, its env is present, and the product does its job — instead of trusting the deploy command's exit code. Also catches server drift before a pull or deploy. Use after any deploy, rollout, restart or server-side fix ("задеплой", "выкати", "проверь на проде", "почему не обновилось"). Loaded by devops, l3-support, infra-provisioner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve the discoverability of the timepicker-ui documentation site (docs-app/) across the full modern discoverability stack — SEO (ranking), AEO (answer engines / featured snippets), GEO (citations inside ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/Claude), and AIO (Google AI Overviews). Use when the user wants to optimize docs SEO, improve Google ranking/positioning, win featured snippets or AI-answer boxes, get the docs cited by AI engines, add or fix sitemap/robots/manifest, fill in page metadata, add Open Graph/Twitter cards, answer-first copy, or JSON-LD (FAQPage/SoftwareApplication/TechArticle/BreadcrumbList). Drives the seo-optimizer subagent with an audit → approve → apply flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defines CC-* code rules and waivers. Use when mapping lint findings to rule IDs or tracking complexity mass, erosion, and verbosity across changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures entropy, mutual information, KL/JS, bits-per-byte. Use when picking KL direction, comparing cross-tokenizer perplexity, trusting MI estimates, or semantic-entropy gating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze HitKeep AI visibility data. Use for AI crawler fetches, AI-referred visits, assistant names or families, citation yield, resource types, top paths, fetch failures, Search Console context, GPTBot, ClaudeBot, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, AI search, or whether assistants are discovering and sending traffic to a site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates task effort by analyzing complexity, dependencies, historical velocity, and risk factors. Produces a structured estimate with confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifying YAGNI, cutting scope, and proposing complexity reductions. A 'subtraction' agent questioning the justification for every feature, dependency, doc, and config. Does not write code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizing SEO (meta/OGP/JSON-LD/headings), SMO (social sharing), CRO (CTA/form/exit-intent), and GEO (AI citation optimization). Use for search ranking, conversion, or AI visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design structured perspective-taking activities with anti-projection guardrails. Develops genuine understanding of complexity across history, social sciences, and literature — not performed empathy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers or wants to build systems to prevent it. For post-cancel win-back email sequences, see emails. For in-app upgrade paywalls, see paywalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。