4,949 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design principles and creative direction for building HTML artifacts — pages, reports, plans, landing pages, demos, decks, and small tools. Use when creating or restyling any visual HTML deliverable and deciding its palette, type pairing, layout, theming, or overall register, or when the output must not look generically AI-generated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user is invoking `doca_spcx_cc` (the host-side CLI under /opt/mellanox/doca/tools/) to load, parameterize, start, observe, or stop a Programmable Congestion Control (SPCX) algorithm on a BlueField with a DPA processor against a live RDMA / RoCE fabric, or picking SPCX vs the established `doca-pcc` surface. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA SPCX" or "doca_spcx_cc" — typical implicit phrasings include "I want to write a custom RTT-based CC algorithm for my RoCE fabric", "my SPCX session loaded but throughput / latency didn't change", "doca_pcc status shows Active but factory CC seems to still be in charge", "DOCA_PCC_PS_ERROR on start", "is the programmable-CC surface available on my install", or "DPA-side algorithm image won't load". Refuse and route elsewhere for DPA-side algorithm authoring detail, factory PCC firmware configuration, read-only PCC counter inspection, raw DPA cycle profiling, RDMA library programming, or general DOCA install — those belong to other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and repair CCB ask/job/message/reply/artifact/callback lineage. Use for missing replies, incomplete artifacts, pending callbacks, retry/resubmit/ack decisions, reply delivery problems, or work-chain resume advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan vault restructuring from config changes. Compares config.yaml against derivation.md, identifies dimension shifts, shows restructuring plan, executes on approval. Triggers on "/refactor", "restructure vault".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Golang semantic code intelligence via `gopls`, the official Go language server — go-to-definition, find references, call/implementation hierarchy, workspace symbol search, package API discovery, diagnostics, safe rename, refactors (extract/inline/fill/rewrite code actions), formatting, and generated tests. Reaches an agent via gopls's own MCP server (`go_*` tools), Claude Code's native `LSP` tool, or the `gopls` CLI. Use when navigating or refactoring Go code — jumping to a definition, finding call sites before a rename, understanding a file's or package's dependencies, running diagnostics after an edit, or extracting/inlining/renaming. Not for the published ecosystem — packages not in your `go.mod`, versions, licenses, importers — → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev` skill (`godig`). Not for a whole-tree vulnerability audit → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill (`govulncheck`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modernize Golang code to use recent language features, standard library improvements, and idiomatic patterns. Use when reviewing Go code with old-style patterns, when encountering a deprecation warning, or when the user asks for modernization, a Go version upgrade (e.g. to Go 1.27), or a CI/tooling refresh. Not for structural refactors, extracting functions, or moving code between packages (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-refactoring` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive guide for dependency injection (DI) in Golang. Covers why DI matters (testability, loose coupling, separation of concerns, lifecycle management), manual constructor injection, and DI library comparison (google/wire, uber-go/dig, uber-go/fx, samber/do). Use this skill when designing service architecture, setting up dependency injection, refactoring tightly coupled code, managing singletons or service factories, or when the user asks about inversion of control, service containers, or wiring dependencies in Go. For a specific DI library, → See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-google-wire`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-dig`, `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-uber-fx`, or `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-do` skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Current technical or business fact to cite from web: web lookup lane - settle a current-facts question in one cited retrieval round with retrieval dates and source-quality notes; for pre-spec grounding across reference implementations use `research`. Use when the user says: web-research, web research, web search, search the web, internet search, look up, look up sources, latest sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user explicitly requests Sepia refactor for minimal in-place prose revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA2) for unsupervised integration of multiple data modalities. Identifies shared and view-specific sources of variation. Use when integrating RNA-seq, proteomics, methylation, or other omics to discover latent factors driving biological variation across modalities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Martin Fowler-inspired refactoring rules when improving existing code structure while preserving observable behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a change through a red-green-refactor loop - failing test first, minimal code to pass, then clean up. Use when implementing a feature or fixing a bug where correctness matters and a test can pin the behavior. Says "TDD", "test first", "red green refactor", "write the test first".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive discovery + implementation workflow that gathers requirements through picker-based questions (intent, scope, constraints, preferences), scans the codebase for what it can already infer, then writes an AWS architectural scaffold and implementation directly into the project. Use when the user wants to build a new app, scaffold a project, or expand/refactor an existing one on AWS — anything that calls for a structured discovery flow followed by code changes, not a one-off lookup. Do not use for: factual lookups about AWS Activate / programs / credits, requests for a single copy-paste prompt, non-AWS architectural work, architecture advice/recommendations without code changes (see architect-for-startups), a new idea centered on an AI agent — runtime selection, agentic architecture, or an agent POC (see agent-advisor), or migrating an existing GCP/Azure/Heroku workload or an LLM SDK rewrite (see gcp-to-aws / azure-to-aws / heroku-to-aws / llm-to-bedrock).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes serverless requests to a compute form factor and the skill that owns it. Applies first to Lambda, API Gateway, EventBridge, Step Functions and event-driven work while the compute, orchestration or integration choice is open — API backends, webhooks, jobs, cron, queue/stream consumers, durable workflows, event routing, Step Functions vs Durable Functions, and Pipes vs native event source mappings for queues and streams. Decides Event Functions on-demand vs Managed Instances, Web Functions, MicroVMs, EventBridge rules/Scheduler/Pipes/bus, HTTP vs REST API. Owns shared Lambda references (cold starts, SnapStart, concurrency, event sources, function URLs, throttling, troubleshooting). Defers to the specialized skill once a request commits to one form factor or service, or describes its defining feature, even unnamed (durable checkpointing and automatic step retries, Firecracker sandbox, managed instances, Node.js server). Not for EC2, ECS/EKS/Fargate or Amplify hosting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run and monitor it to completion for Provisioned (Python DAG, via Airflow REST API) and Serverless (YAML workflow, via StartWorkflowRun). Verifies the artifact is deployed and parse-ready, triggers with confirmation, polls to terminal state, and on failure delegates diagnosis to debugging-mwaa-workflow and artifact/redeploy fixes to authoring-mwaa-workflow, then retests up to a capped number of attempts. Triggers on: test my DAG, test my workflow, run my DAG, trigger a test run, does my DAG work, smoke-test the pipeline, verify my workflow runs, execute my DAG to check it. Not applicable to writing or deploying a new workflow (handled by authoring-mwaa-workflow), or for diagnosing why a run failed or root-causing an error (handled by debugging-mwaa-workflow).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors and deploys MWAA workflow artifacts: Python Airflow DAGs for provisioned environments or YAML workflow files for Serverless. Covers operator selection, timeout design, retry strategy, scheduling, failure notifications, idempotency, and MWAA Serverless schema compliance. Deploys the artifact (S3 DAG upload or Serverless CreateWorkflow/UpdateWorkflow), creates an environment inline when approved, and redeploys fixes, then optionally hands off to testing-mwaa-workflow. Triggers on: create a DAG, write a pipeline, build a workflow, orchestrate tasks, Airflow DAG, data pipeline, schedule a job, deploy a DAG, deploy a workflow, YAML workflow. Not applicable to converting or migrating existing DAGs between provisioned and serverless (conversion is out of scope), running or smoke-testing a deployed workflow (handled by testing-mwaa-workflow) or diagnosing a failed run (handled by debugging-mwaa-workflow).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Also use when the user says "openspec update change" or "opsx update". If the user means the openspec update CLI command, which refreshes generated files, run that command instead. Never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。