2,270 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verify a research claim or academic citation by tracing it through publication → methodology → raw data → independent replication. Routes through perplexity-research for the actual web lookup, then formats results as a citation-checked brain page. Use when a book/article/conversation cites a study and you want to confirm the claim is real, replicated, and accurately characterized.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep learning for single-cell analysis using scvi-tools. This skill should be used when users need (1) data integration and batch correction with scVI/scANVI, (2) ATAC-seq analysis with PeakVI, (3) CITE-seq multi-modal analysis with totalVI, (4) multiome RNA+ATAC analysis with MultiVI, (5) spatial transcriptomics deconvolution with DestVI, (6) label transfer and reference mapping with scANVI/scArches, (7) RNA velocity with veloVI, or (8) any deep learning-based single-cell method. Triggers include mentions of scVI, scANVI, totalVI, PeakVI, MultiVI, DestVI, veloVI, sysVI, scArches, variational autoencoder, VAE, batch correction, data integration, multi-modal, CITE-seq, multiome, reference mapping, latent space.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply statistical methods including descriptive stats, trend analysis, outlier detection, and hypothesis testing. Use when analyzing distributions, testing for significance, detecting anomalies, computing correlations, or interpreting statistical results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA an analysis before sharing -- methodology, accuracy, and bias checks. Use when reviewing an analysis before a stakeholder presentation, spot-checking calculations and aggregation logic, verifying a SQL query's results look right, or assessing whether conclusions are actually supported by the data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hypothesis-driven debugging methodology for hard bugs. Use this skill whenever you're investigating non-trivial bugs, unexpected behavior, flaky tests, or tracing issues through complex systems. Activate proactively when debugging requires more than a quick glance — especially when the first attempt at a fix didn't work, when behavior seems "impossible", or when you're tempted to blame an external system (model, API, library) without evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior Project Manager for enterprise software, SaaS, and digital transformation projects. Specializes in portfolio management, quantitative risk analysis, resource optimization, stakeholder alignment, and executive reporting. Uses advanced methodologies including EMV analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, WSJF prioritization, and multi-dimensional health scoring. Use when a user needs help with project plans, project status reports, risk assessments, resource allocation, project roadmaps, milestone tracking, team capacity planning, portfolio health reviews, program management, or executive-level project reporting — especially for enterprise-scale initiatives with multiple workstreams, complex dependencies, or multi-million dollar budgets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'no hallucinations', 'verify APIs', 'reality check', or 'don't invent functions'. Prevents the agent from calling methods, imports, or variables that do not provably exist in the user's installed version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design lean startup experiments (pretotypes) for a new product. Creates XYZ hypotheses and suggests low-effort validation methods like landing pages, explainer videos, and pre-orders. Use when validating a new product idea, creating pretotypes, or testing market demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrates Android applications from the old, legacy Google Mobile Ads (GMA) SDK (com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads) to the new GMA Next-Gen SDK (com.google.android.libraries.ads.mobile.sdk:ads-mobile-sdk). Provides comprehensive mapping tables for imports, classes, and method signatures to help determine migration steps. Use when migrating an existing Android codebase from the old, legacy GMA SDK to GMA Next-Gen SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Field-tested methodology and concrete recipes for training and operating large-scale LLM/VLM/multi-modal models end to end - choosing and benchmarking accelerators, storage and network; SLURM/Kubernetes orchestration; maximizing training throughput and fitting models in memory; diagnosing and surviving training instabilities, NaN/Inf, and hardware/job failures; checkpointing and fault tolerance; inference performance and memory; debugging multi-node/ multi-GPU hangs; and writing/running tests. Use when the user is training or fine-tuning large models, hits low TFLOPS/MFU, OOM, slow dataloading, a loss spike/divergence, a NCCL/InfiniBand or multi-node hang, node/GPU failures, checkpoint or preemption problems, storage/network bottlenecks, or needs to pick GPUs/cloud/file-systems or size inference latency/throughput. Distilled from "Machine Learning Engineering", the latest version of which can be found at https://github.com/stas00/ml-engineering The latest SKILL.md version can be found at https://github.com/stas00/ml-engineering/blob/master/skills/ml-engineering/SKILL.md
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or review a paper entry in TRL's paper index. Use when a PR implements a method, algorithm, or training approach from a research paper, or when reviewing such a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-layer bias analysis on any URL, file, or text — auto-fetches the content and any cited study, then audits data-level biases, source conflicts of interest, and journalism-added distortions, separating what the data supports from what's editorialized. USE WHEN bias analysis, analyze bias, bias check, check this study, who funded this, is this source biased, fact-check article, methodological flaws, source credibility, what's wrong with this claim. NOT FOR psychological author analysis, research synthesis (use Research), entity due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The scientific method as a universal problem-solving algorithm — goal-first, plural falsifiable hypotheses, designed experiments, and honest measurement, scaling from TDD to feature validation to MVP launch. USE WHEN think about, figure out, experiment, iterate, optimize, hypothesis, science, full cycle, quick diagnosis, structured investigation, how do we test, analyze results. NOT FOR multi-angle lens passes (use IterativeDepth).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Physics-based reasoning framework (Musk methodology) that deconstructs a problem to irreducible fundamental truths, classifies every element as hard constraint, soft constraint, or assumption, then reconstructs the optimal solution from fundamentals alone. USE WHEN first principles, fundamental truths, challenge assumptions, real constraint, rebuild from scratch, start over, physics first, question everything, reasoning by analogy. NOT FOR structural feedback loops (use SystemsThinking).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit expert for OWASP Top 10, CVE analysis, code review, and penetration testing methodology
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for AI intelligence collection — OSINT methodology, entity extraction, knowledge graphs, change detection, and sentiment analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for AI deep research — methodology, source evaluation, search optimization, cross-referencing, synthesis, and citation formats
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。