950 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
OSS-only security for OWASP Top 10, pentest, vuln testing (XSS, SSRF, CSRF, business-logic, Host header), threat modeling (STRIDE, ATT&CK), Sigma rules, SAST, code audit, AI/LLM red-team, or replacing paid tools (Burp, Nessus, Splunk) with OSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task may benefit from a bounded subagent for implementation, large-codebase discovery at task start, independent review, requested or pre-commit code simplification, or expert work on complex decisions, modeling, automation, or repeated failures. The main agent chooses whether to delegate and accepts the result. Do not use for simple questions or short work with no meaningful review or delegation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a broad, authorized security audit across application, infrastructure, identity, dependencies, and operations. Use when the user needs a scoped security posture review; use the SAST, DAST, dependency-scanning, or threat-modeling skill when the request is limited to one specialist activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive marketing analytics reports by collecting KPIs, analyzing trends, and delivering actionable insights with attribution modeling and funnel analysis. Use when the user requests analytics reporting or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design RESTful APIs with proper resource modeling, HTTP method semantics, status codes, pagination, versioning, and documentation. Use when the user requests api design or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform systematic exploratory data analysis to understand dataset structure, distributions, relationships, and anomalies before modeling. Use when a dataset is new, its quality is unknown, or the user requests open-ended profiling; use data-analysis instead for a defined hypothesis or decision question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
What-if scenario analysis, scenario tree construction, base bull bear case, sensitivity to macro variables, revenue scenario modeling, cost scenario analysis, margin impact scenarios, interest rate sensitivity, currency impact scenarios, commodity price scenarios
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Currency analysis, FX rate forecast, carry trade analysis, purchasing power parity, central bank divergence, currency regime, dollar index DXY, forex strategy, exchange rate modeling, capital flow analysis, currency crisis, peg defense
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Geomagnetist. Use when a task calls for Geomagnetist judgment. Reasons from spherical-harmonic main-field theory and remanence physics through IGRF-14/WMM2025 vs CHAOS-8 SV, INTERMAGNET baseline adoption (IBFV2.00), Swarm quiet-time modeling, stepwise AF/thermal demagnetization with PCA/Fisher, GEOMAGIA50/MagIC archaeomagnetic SVCs, and GFZ Kp/ap indices while treating geomagnetic jerks, IGRF epoch mismatch, VRM/CRM overprints, and Day-diagram mixed-carrier traps as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Immunotherapy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Immunotherapy Scientist judgment. Reasons from antigen recognition and checkpoint circuits through CAR-T/bispecific design, ASTCT CRS/ICANS grading, flow cytometry release CQAs, iRECIST response assessment, COMPASS/TIDE biomarker modeling, and JACIE/FACT IEC accreditation while treating antigen escape, pseudoprogression, tonic signaling, and step-up CRS as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Geochemist. Use when a task calls for Geochemist judgment. Reasons from Gibbs equilibria, mass and isotope balance, and fluid–rock interaction through stable (δ) and radiogenic (ε, isochron) systems, ICP-MS/LA-ICP-MS/TIMS/MC-ICP-MS/IRMS, PHREEQC/Perple_X phase modeling, and EarthChem/GeoReM workflows while treating alteration, matrix effects, Pb loss, mixing arrays, and Fretwell’s Law violations as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Geodynamics & Tectonics Scientist. Use when a task calls for Geodynamics & Tectonics Scientist judgment. Reasons from plate kinematics, lithospheric rheology, and interseismic-versus-coseismic strain partitioning through GAMIT/GLOBK and MintPy geodesy, Okada/viscoelastic slip inversion, OxCal paleoseismic chronologies, ASPECT mantle modeling, and OpenQuake/USGS NSHM hazard while treating InSAR atmospheric delay, monument instability, unmodeled postseismic afterslip, and incompatible-timescale rate stacking as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Hydrogeologist. Use when a task calls for Hydrogeologist judgment. Reasons from Darcy's law, mass conservation, aquifer heterogeneity, and coupled biogeochemical transport through Theis and Cooper-Jacob aquifer-test analysis, MODFLOW/MT3DMS modeling with PEST uncertainty, and low-flow geochemical sampling while treating wellbore-storage and skin artifacts, equivalent-porous-medium failure in fractured/karst flow, and non-unique K-S calibration as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Hydraulic Engineer. Use when a task calls for Hydraulic Engineer judgment. Reasons from Bernoulli–Darcy–Weisbach, Moody diagrams, HEC-RAS/EPANET modeling, and pump/system curves while treating transient water hammer, air entrainment, and roughness aging as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Fire Protection Engineer. Use when a task calls for Fire Protection Engineer judgment. Reasons from NFPA 13 Hazen-Williams hydraulics (K-factor, remote area, hose stream) and NFPA 101 egress (occupant load, travel distance, capacity factors) through NFPA 92 smoke containment/management, ASET/RSET PBD, and FDS/CFAST/CONTAM/PyroSim modeling while treating breached compartmentation, C-factor/fitting errors, and supply-curve shortfall as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Crop Protection Scientist. Use when a task calls for Crop Protection Scientist judgment. Reasons from IPM, EIL/ET, and FRAC/HRAC/IRAC MoA rotation through GEP/EPPO efficacy trials, CDMS label law, BBCH timing, DRT application, PPDB/fate modeling, and MRL/GAP alignment while treating resistance, drift, herbicide carryover, and abiotic mimicry as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Cryptography Engineer. Use when a task calls for Cryptography Engineer judgment. Reasons from explicit threat models, vetted primitives, key hierarchy, and constant-time secret handling through STRIDE threat modeling, standards (RFC 8446 TLS 1.3, FIPS 203/204, Ed25519), test vectors (Wycheproof, NIST CAVP), and protocol verifiers (Tamarin, ProVerif) while treating nonce reuse in AEAD, padding/Bleichenbacher oracles, timing side channels, and weak-RNG keys as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Biogeochemist. Use when a task calls for Biogeochemist judgment. Reasons from coupled C/N/P/S redox cycles through TEAP zonation, porewater Rhizon-peeper sampling, δ13C/δ15N/δ34S tracers, chamber and eddy-covariance fluxes, and Century/DayCent SOM modeling while treating porewater O2 contamination and nitrification-denitrification coupling errors as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Applied Mathematician. Use when a task calls for Applied Mathematician judgment. Reasons from formulation-first modeling, Buckingham scaling, and asymptotics (matched expansions, boundary layers) through FEM/FVM numerics (FEniCS, PETSc, LAPACK), Tikhonov inverse problems, and ASME/Sandia V&V while treating ill-posed inversion, stiffness, and numerical diffusion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Astronomical Instrumentation Scientist. Use when a task calls for Astronomical Instrumentation Scientist judgment. Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, edit, analyze, and verify professional Excel workbooks for general business and operational use. Use when the deliverable is an .xlsx file; use a finance-specific modeling workflow for valuation or regulated financial models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production guidance for planning, building, animating, capturing, and reviewing complete Three.js scenes for rendered media. Use for browser-native 3D product shots, title sequences, procedural worlds, glTF scene assembly, camera and lighting animation, shaders, post-processing, deterministic frame export, and Three.js render QA; not for modeling standalone assets, WebXR interaction, or generic website decoration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Processes environmental DNA metabarcoding data from raw amplicon reads to species occurrence tables using OBITools3, DADA2, and taxonomic assignment against BOLD, MIDORI2, or MitoFish databases. Handles COI, 12S, rbcL, and ITS barcode regions with primer removal, denoising, chimera detection, and contamination filtering via decontam. Includes occupancy modeling (occumb) for detection probability correction. Use when analyzing eDNA from water, soil, or bulk samples for biodiversity monitoring. Not for 16S human microbiome (see microbiome/amplicon-processing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。