6,338 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate standard unit tests for one or more target classes in Apache ShardingSphere; cover requested behavior and every affected SUT-owned branch, enforce an explicitly requested numeric coverage target, and pass quality gates; perform explicit merge analysis, suitability filtering, and refactor optimization for parameterized tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement, fix, refactor, or remove repository code under required scope, non-regression, verification, and review gates. Use whenever a task may change a production, test, script, or other implementation artifact, including build logic, generated source, and behavior-affecting configuration. Also use it alongside a specialized code-changing Skill. Do not use for read-only analysis or review, diagnosis-only work, or prose-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Chmeetings tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI Berkshire skill: 财报精读：一手资料深度解读. Source: skills/earnings-review.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI Berkshire skill: 财报精读团队：四大师并行解读 + 公众号发布. Source: skills/earnings-team.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide agents through using the OpenShell CLI (openshell) for sandbox management, gateway registration, provider configuration and refresh, profile management, policy iteration, settings, service exposure, BYOC workflows, and attached-provider inference. Covers basic through advanced multi-step workflows. Trigger keywords - openshell, sandbox create, sandbox exec, sandbox connect, logs, provider create, profile list, profile describe, provider refresh, policy set, policy get, settings, service expose, forward, port forward, BYOC, bring your own container, inference, use openshell, run openshell, CLI usage, manage sandbox, manage provider, gateway add, gateway select.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Loads, reloads, and reshapes the map on a running CARLA server via the Python API — get_available_maps, load_world and reload_world (with or without resetting world settings), generate a world from an OpenDRIVE .xodr, and load/unload map layers. Use when the user asks to "load a map", "change the town", "reload the world", "list available maps", "load an xodr/opendrive map", or "load/unload map layers", and when settings (sync mode, fixed delta) must survive the switch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lists and toggles a map's static environment objects via get_environment_objects / enable_environment_objects — hide or show buildings, vegetation, poles, fences, traffic signs and other baked assets by CityObjectLabel (and optional name filter). Use when the user asks to "hide/remove the buildings", "turn off the trees/vegetation", "show only the roads", "disable the fences", or "list the environment objects". Affects rendering and collision; resets on map reload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open-source embedding database for AI applications. Store embeddings and metadata, perform vector and full-text search, filter by metadata. Simple 4-function API. Scales from notebooks to production clusters. Use for semantic search, RAG applications, or document retrieval. Best for local development and open-source projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates, formats, and validates technical documentation — including docstrings, OpenAPI/Swagger specs, JSDoc annotations, doc portals, and user guides. Use when adding docstrings to functions or classes, creating API documentation, building documentation sites, or writing tutorials and user guides. Invoke for OpenAPI/Swagger specs, JSDoc, doc portals, getting started guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read existing Codex Security Cloud findings, reports, recorded assignment and verification, and scan status from the connected account. Use for Cloud read requests and finding links, not local scans or requests to change Cloud data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Supports issue batches, duplicate checks, and reviewed writes. Do not use for scans or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aggregate diligence findings into a deal team briefing at the right altitude for the audience — exec summary for leadership, working summary for the team. Use when user says "brief the deal team", "what's the state of diligence", "summarize findings for [audience]", "deal update", or on the briefing cadence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts board or committee meeting minutes in your house format. Auto-detects upcoming board and committee meetings from your calendar, asks for the agenda and any slides or pre-read materials, and produces a complete draft in the format learned from your seed minutes. Also handles written consents in lieu of meetings. Trigger: "board minutes", "draft minutes", "upcoming board meeting", "committee minutes", "written consent", or calendar detection of an upcoming board or committee event.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a batch of raw security findings. Verify each is real, collapse duplicates, re-rank by derived exploitability, and tag with an owner. Takes a directory or file of scanner output and writes TRIAGE.json + TRIAGE.md sorted by what actually needs engineering attention. Use when asked to "triage findings", "validate scanner output", "prioritize vulns", or "review the backlog". Runs interactively by default; pass --auto to skip the interview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect a ChatGPT Apps MCP server codebase and generate chatgpt-app-submission.json with app info suggestions, tool hint justifications, test cases, and negative test cases, then report review-check findings and outputSchema warnings for submission review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing full pre-earnings preview reports with executive summary, expectation bar, guidance credibility, KPI dashboard, scenarios, and call questions. Do not use after results or for short summaries unless the user explicitly asks for a summary/short version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing public-company earnings after results, guidance, transcript, or call commentary. Do not use for pre-print previews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。