1,068 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when deciding whether an applied-micro project belongs at the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) rather than AER, AEJ: Economic Policy, or a field journal, and what its central question should be. Sets venue fit and question scope; it does not design the identification (see aeja-identification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assembling the data, code, and documentation package for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript to pass the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor's pre-publication reproducibility check. Covers macro specifics (simulation/calibration code, restricted-access data); it does not write the analysis itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aejpol-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assembling the data and code replication package for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript to pass the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor's pre-publication reproducibility check. Builds the openICPSR deposit and README; it does not run the analysis or write the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA online submission system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, the Data and Code Availability Statement, and disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing an ACM CCS submission for HotCRP readiness, dual-cycle abstract registration and full-paper deadlines, the 12-page ACM sigconf body, anonymization, the ethics considerations appendix, artifact-availability posture, dual-submission policy, per-cycle submission caps, desk-reject triggers, and final-week sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad-AI-audience fit, a first-page contribution statement legible to non-specialist Phase-1 reviewers, two-column readability, concise novelty claims, reproducibility-checklist alignment, hedged limitations and ethics, and policy-aware framing of AI-system and capability claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register, add, or update existing custom Simulink block libraries and configure block policy and knowledge index. Use when a user wants to register, set up, configure, or add existing .slx library files for agent-assisted model building. Do NOT use when the user wants to create or author a new library from scratch — that requires building-simulink-models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns Hi-C/Micro-C FASTQ into a deduplicated, filtered .pairs file with pairtools and decides whether the library worked. Covers the bwa mem -SP5M / bwa-mem2 / chromap --preset hic alignment idiom (mates mapped as independent single-end reads), pairtools parse vs parse2 and the walks-policy choice (5unique pairwise vs all for Pore-C/Micro-C concatemers), pair-type classification (keep UU and rescued UC), dedup (PCR vs optical/by-tile), select by pair_type/MAPQ/distance, restriction-fragment handling (restrict, Arima dual-enzyme, Micro-C/DNase fragment-free), and allele-specific phasing (pairtools phase to two coolers). The library-QC decision uses % long-range cis as the one-number quality metric, trans as the noise floor, orientation balance as fragment-map-free dangling-end/self-circle QC, and % duplicates as a complexity proxy. Use when processing Hi-C/Micro-C/Omni-C reads into pairs, judging library quality, handling multi-enzyme or restriction-agnostic protocols, or generating allele-specific contacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Volcengine official documentation lookup helper. Supports both document search and full-content fetch across Volcengine products, developer tools, support content, best practices, pricing, deployment, troubleshooting, API, SDK, and policy pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and plan migrations from existing VPN, SWG, or SASE platforms to Cloudflare One, including policy mapping, parity gaps, and rollout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use service mesh patterns for AI inference traffic management, mTLS, canary releases, policy enforcement, and cross-cluster resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design secure, multi-tenant LLM hosting platforms with tenant isolation, quotas, billing attribution, noisy-neighbor protection, and per-tenant policy controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harden Windows servers per security baselines and CIS benchmarks. Configure Group Policy, Windows Defender, and security features. Use when securing Windows Server environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Return policy and process — TikTok Shop policies, return rate reduction, customer communication
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize e-commerce returns process and reduce return rates. Returns policy design, reverse logistics, root cause analysis, and customer retention through better returns experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch and supervise Claude Code or Codex through the CCAM Run API. Use when the user wants to start a monitored agent, select a model, approval policy, sandbox, or working directory, send a follow-up, inspect live output, resume a native session, or stop a dashboard-launched run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate and maintain the local MCP server for this repository. Use for MCP tool updates, policy-guard changes, host configuration, and MCP runtime troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate and maintain the local MCP server for this project. Use when creating MCP host config, troubleshooting tool connectivity, modifying tool domains, or adjusting safety policy flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure, launch, validate, and troubleshoot CCAM's comprehensive MCP server for Claude Code, Codex, and other MCP hosts. Use when installing dependencies, building the server, selecting stdio, HTTP, or REPL transport, setting mutation/destructive policy, supplying dashboard authentication, or checking complete tool registration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。