1,623 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Sets up, audits, and reports on marketing measurement — tracking plans, event schemas, attribution models, and the dashboards built on them. Use this to instrument a site or product, audit tracking nobody trusts, choose or interpret an attribution model, build reporting that answers a specific question, or reconcile numbers that disagree between tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qianfan Deep Research Agent for complex research tasks. Combines information retrieval, multi-source analysis, content synthesis, and report generation. Use when user needs in-depth research, analysis reports, or comprehensive investigation on complex topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work, and before telling the user that something was never recorded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing FASTQC quality reports from sequencing data, identifying quality issues in NGS datasets, or troubleshooting sequencing problems. Interprets quality metrics and provides actionable recommendations for RNA-seq, DNA-seq, and ChIP-seq data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statistical analysis and reporting for experimental datasets; use when you need to interpret experimental results, test significance (t-tests/ANOVA), or generate reproducible reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures and writes discussion sections for academic papers and research reports. Use when writing a discussion section, interpreting research results, connecting findings to existing literature, addressing study limitations, synthesizing conclusions, or drafting any part of...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when interpreting scientific graphs and charts, explaining data visualizations for research presentations, writing figure captions for publications, or analyzing trends in clinical research data. Converts complex visual data into clear, accurate explanations for academic papers, clinical reports, and public presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research what Chinese internet users actually said in the last 30 days across Weibo, Xiaohongshu (RED), Bilibili, Zhihu, Douyin, WeChat public accounts, Baidu and Toutiao: engagement-weighted ranking, cross-platform clustering, cited Markdown/JSON/HTML reports. Also shows today's cross-platform hot-search board (全网热榜, --hot) and can add Hacker News / GitHub / Reddit or an installed upstream last30days for X/YouTube/TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating Hindenburg-style investigative short reports: evidence chains, promoter networks, stock promotion, related parties, disclosure failures, and catalyst-driven short narratives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An enterprise-grade, AI-powered penetration testing automation CLI tool. Orchestrates multiple specialized AI agents (Planner, ToolAgent, Analyst, Reporter) backed by 4 AI providers (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, OpenRouter) and 19 integrated security tools through YAML-defined workflows. Produces professional Markdown, HTML, or JSON security reports with full evidence capture and traceability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate user demand research reports from real user feedback. Scrape and analyze feature requests, complaints, and questions from Reddit, X, GitHub, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Amazon. Use when user wants to do demand research, find feature requests, analyze user demand, or run RequestHunt queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill any time a .docx file is involved -- as input, output, or both. This includes: creating Word documents, reports, letters, memos, or proposals; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .docx file; editing, modifying, or updating existing documents; working with templates, tracked changes, comments, headers/footers, or tables of contents. Trigger whenever the user mentions 'Word doc', 'document', 'report', 'letter', 'memo', or references a .docx filename.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document', 'onboarding form', 'HR intake', 'survey template', 'contract / SOW template', 'mail-merge template', 'compliance checklist', 'medical intake questionnaire'. Output is a single .docx where specific fields are editable and the rest is locked. This skill is INDEPENDENT, not a scene layer on docx — payload is `<w:sdt>` + `<w:ffData>` + `<w:fldChar>` + `documentProtection`, none of which docx base skill covers. Do NOT trigger for regular reports, letters, memos, academic papers, pitch decks, or any document with no user-fillable fields — route those to officecli-docx or its scene layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Trivy vulnerability scanner in offline mode to discover security vulnerabilities in dependency files. This skill covers setting up offline scanning, executing Trivy against package lock files, and generating JSON vulnerability reports without requiring internet access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational workflow for hard integer-programming optimization tasks: selecting an installed solver, preserving solver/incumbent certificates, extracting feasible schedules, recomputing metrics from final outputs, and writing consistent reports. Use when a task requires a MIP, solver status, objective value, bound, gap, formulation write-up, or benchmark output files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Searches across your Notion workspace, synthesizes findings from multiple pages, and creates comprehensive research documentation saved as new Notion pages. Turns scattered information into structured reports with proper citations and actionable insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform data into compelling narratives using visualization, context, and persuasive structure. Use when presenting analytics to stakeholders, creating data reports, or building executive presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch. Seeds known defects into a copy of a real artifact plus a clean control, runs the checker, and reports recall and false-positive rate into a qualification ledger. Use when the user says "does this check work", "qualify the gate", "test my reviewer", "seed defects", "vaccinate", "qualify the checks", "can I trust this review", "does it pass for the right reason", or before relying on any automated check or referee simulation for a decision that matters. NOT a code fixer and NOT a reviewer itself — it grades the grader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable. Use when user says "verify these citations", "check the claims in X", "did I hallucinate anything", "fact-check this draft", "run CoVe on this", or after any text generation that asserts facts about papers, datasets, or numerical results. NOT for style/grammar review (use `/proofread`) or substance review (use `/review-paper`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Distill the current conversation into a structured note (decisions made, open questions, file pointers with line numbers, next 1–3 actions) and save to `quality_reports/session_logs/` before auto-compression. Differs from `/checkpoint` (explicit stop-point snapshot) and from auto-compaction (which truncates rather than distills). Use when context is approaching auto-compact threshold, when a long pipeline has accumulated many decisions, or when the user says "compress", "distil this session", "before we hit auto-compact", "structured handoff before context resets".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。