「scribe」の検索結果

Triages AWS CloudWatch alarms using boto3 CloudWatch.describe_alarms, CloudWatch Logs Insights queries, and AWS X-Ray trace analysis via the xray-sdk. Correlates alarm triggers with deployment events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes structured diagnostic runbooks when CloudWatch Anomaly Detection triggers alarms. Uses the AWS SDK CloudWatch client (GetMetricData, DescribeAlarms) to gather context and suggest remediations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses AWS SDK CloudWatchClient GetMetricData and CloudWatch Logs Insights StartQueryExecution to automate incident triage. Correlates alarms via DescribeAlarms with X-Ray trace segments for root cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transcribes audio and generates auto-chapters with summaries using AssemblyAI's /v2/transcript endpoint with auto_chapters=true. Extracts key topics, sentiment analysis, and content safety labels via AssemblyAI SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give Claude Code a video perception layer that extracts frames, transcribes audio, and lets Claude answer questions about local videos or YouTube URLs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide what to borrow, adapt, or write before building something. Use when the user describes an app, tool, CLI, or feature they want to build and needs to know which parts already exist as open-source GitHub repos (BORROW), which are worth reading and adapting (KITBASH), and which to just write (WRITE). Every repository named is checked against the live GitHub API, so invented ones never reach the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured software specifications for features, bug fixes, and products. Use when the user wants to create a spec, PRD, feature brief, requirements document, or when starting any new implementation that needs a specification first. Invoke via /spec-writer or when the user says "write a spec", "spec this out", "create a spec", "I need a spec for...", or describes a feature they want to build. Produces adaptive-complexity specs with Job Stories, Gherkin acceptance criteria, and three-tier boundaries. Output is a markdown file ready for agent execution or human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a short, honest account of where using Mycelium was confusing or slow, for the user to edit and choose whether to send. Reports experience; never prescribes fixes. Based on Hoskins's friction logging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging .NET/C# code that uses the BallisticCalculator NuGet package (namespace BallisticCalculator) or its Gehtsoft.Measurements unit types — even when the user doesn't name the package explicitly but is clearly doing external/interior ballistics in .NET (bullet drop, velocity, energy, windage, spin drift, time of flight, zeroing a scope) for rifles, air rifles, bows, or artillery. Covers the full public API (Ammunition, Rifle, Atmosphere, Wind, ShotParameters, TrajectoryCalculator, TrajectoryPoint); standard, custom, .drg, and multi-BC drag tables; saving/loading data and building your own file format around it (BXml and System.Text.Json serialization); and building or rendering scope reticles (e.g. to SVG). Also use it for this library's Gehtsoft.Measurements Measurement<T> unit types (DistanceUnit, VelocityUnit, AngularUnit, WeightUnit, PressureUnit, …). Skip for: generic physics or projectile-motion exercises, a different ballistics library (e.g. GNU/JBM), game-engine or Unity projectile motion, plain unit conversions, and non-code ballistics questions (load-data or forensics advice). Self-contained: no access to the library source or binaries is required — prefer this over scanning the package to rediscover the API. Describes 1.1.13+, including the named ZeroRangeCantBeReachedException / TrajectoryCannotBeCalculatedException failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding support for a new model architecture to imp, porting a model family, or debugging a model that loads but produces wrong output - "add support for <model>", "new arch", loader detection, chat template, tokenizer parity, RoPE variant, "outputs garbage", "prompt-blind", "digits scrambled", "NaN logits", "describes a different picture", "does it fit in VRAM". Do NOT use for kernel performance (sm120-cuda-expert) or quant-format questions (quant-formats).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for any cap-table number, mechanic, or date before a founder signs, from a single SAFE, note or warrant described in chat or a quick 'is this dilution reasonable?' check to any draft or signed SAFE, note, term sheet, option plan, AoA, Carta XLSX, or spreadsheet. A single question gets a short cited answer in about 2–3 minutes; the full report, about 5–10 minutes, runs only when the founder shares documents or asks for it. Source-cited deterministic math (YC, NVCA, Cooley GO) for SAFE/note conversion, priced-round dilution, anti-dilution, option pools, warrants, MFN chains, dual-class voting, QSBS and Israeli §102 dates, and Israeli ↔ Delaware flips. NOT for waterfall modeling, cumulative dividends, RSUs, 83(b), 409A, SPAC, warrant repricing, or pure term definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Describes Form and Actions implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract transcript and key slides from a local video file, then create a vault-formatted lecture note. Use this skill whenever a user provides a local video file (.mp4, .mov, .mkv, .avi, .webm) and wants notes from it. Triggers on "lecture", "take notes", "I have a recording of", "class video", "transcribe this presentation", "process this video for notes", or /lecture. Works with any language — auto-detects transcript language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebalances context across Memory, Custom Instructions, knowledge files, and User Preferences in Claude Projects. Audits Memory for redundancy, staleness, and misplacement; prescribes optimization including Codification of stable Memory patterns into explicit User Preferences or Project CI rules. Use when user says "optimize my memory," "what should be in my memory," "trim my knowledge files," "reduce my context usage," "rebalance my project," "what should be in my preferences vs memory," or asks whether something belongs in Memory, a knowledge file, or User Preferences. Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project feels bloated," "Claude keeps forgetting things," "my context window keeps hitting limits." Activate whenever Memory-layer balance is the primary concern. Do NOT use for full Project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or global-layer audits that don't touch Project Memory (use rootnode-global-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a local coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or similar) needs to operate Multica through the authenticated `multica` CLI: reading or updating issues, comments, metadata, labels, custom properties, subscribers, projects, agents, squads, runtimes, repos, skills, autopilots, attachments, or workspace state; searching issues; inspecting or cancelling agent runs; replying to a Multica issue from an external agent; creating or triaging issues; checking linked pull requests; or safely handling Multica mention/status side effects without relying on the Multica hosted agent runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize videos, audio files, and podcasts into key takeaways. Give it a YouTube/podcast URL or a local audio/video file — it transcribes locally (cached; repeat requests reuse the transcript) and distills the transcript into key points, summaries, or translations. Use when the user asks to summarize, get key points from, translate, or TL;DR any audio or video content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a person through healing modalities including energy work (reiki, chakra balancing), herbal remedies, basic first aid stabilization, and holistic techniques (breathwork, visualization, body scan). AI coaches the practitioner through assessment triage, modality selection, energetic connection, remedy preparation, and integration. Use when a person describes a physical ailment or injury, reports energetic imbalance (fatigue, emotional stagnation), wants coaching through a holistic breathwork or visualization session, or needs post-meditation integration with directed healing attention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to restore service from a known failure with a prescribed recovery operation. Not for design-time failure definition or open-ended debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user describes an AI workflow gap or uses an ambiguous cross-session reference such as 'the PR Bob mentioned'. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA workflow for testing a feature or task implementation. Analyzes changes, produces test plans, and describes concrete test scenarios. Use when user says "test this", "write test plan", "what should I test", or "QA this branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。