8,551 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Dedicated security-audit route for OWASP-style risks, secret leaks, auth flaws, injection, unsafe input handling, SSRF/XSS, and sensitive-data exposure. Use instead of code-reviewer when the prompt explicitly asks for security, vulnerability, threat, auth, or OWASP review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user is deploying or operating the DOCA Argus Service — the packaged BlueField-side runtime-security container that watches the BlueField and attached host for suspicious activity, integrity violations, and operational anomalies, and forwards findings to a SIEM (Splunk / ELK / Sentinel / syslog). Covers the four-axis config (detection policy, forwarding, sampling, host coverage), running the NGC container on BlueField Arm, and wiring the forwarder. Trigger even without "DOCA Argus" by name — typical implicit phrasings: "container green but no findings arrive", "false-positive flood in Splunk", or "runtime security on a fleet of BlueField-3s". Refuse and route elsewhere for installing DOCA, SIEM-side ingest stanzas, pre-baked detection-rule packs, and metrics observability (DOCA Telemetry). Argus is NVIDIA's currently- promoted runtime-security framework, superseding the older App Shield library; name it first for new runtime-security work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline configuration for Golang projects — workflow files for test, lint, SAST, coverage and vulnerability-scan jobs, Dependabot and Renovate config files, GoReleaser release pipelines, Docker build/push, repository security settings, and AI-driven PR review. Use when setting up or improving Go project CI, writing or fixing `.github/workflows/*.yml`, adding a linter or security scanner as a pipeline job, wiring automated dependency-update bots, or adding quality gates. Covers wiring tools into a pipeline, not the analysis they perform: do NOT use for choosing or interpreting security findings (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill) or for choosing, upgrading, or auditing dependency versions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Key Vault SDK for Python. Use for secrets, keys, and certificates management with secure storage. Triggers: "key vault", "SecretClient", "KeyClient", "CertificateClient", "secrets", "encryption keys".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Key Vault Secrets Java SDK for secret management. Use when storing, retrieving, or managing passwords, API keys, connection strings, or other sensitive configuration data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing sector and industry performance charts to assess market positioning and rotation patterns. Use this skill when the user provides performance chart images (1-week or 1-month timeframes) for sectors or industries and requests market cycle assessment, sector rotation analysis, or strategic positioning recommendations based on performance data. All analysis and output are conducted in English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing sector rotation patterns and market cycle positioning. It fetches sector uptrend data from CSV (no API key required) and optionally accepts chart images for supplementary analysis. Use this skill when the user requests sector rotation analysis, cyclical vs defensive assessment, overbought/oversold identification, or market cycle phase estimation. All analysis and output are conducted in English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast AWS Security Agent diff scan on only the changed code since a git ref. Use when the user asks to scan changes, run a diff scan, check what changed for security issues, scan before committing, scan before PR, or any pre-commit/pre-push security check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and secure S3 buckets following AWS best practices for access control, encryption, monitoring, and remediation of misconfigurations. Use when the user wants to secure a new bucket, audit an existing bucket, fix a security finding, configure encryption, or enable logging and monitoring. Do NOT use for general S3 data operations, S3 Tables setup, or discovering existing data assets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and apply AssemblyAI secret, region, consent, retention, deletion, and model-training controls. Use when reviewing security or regulated speech workflows. Trigger with "AssemblyAI security", "AssemblyAI privacy", or "data retention".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and harden Algolia credentials, record exposure, index restrictions, and tenant search controls. Use when reviewing frontend keys, backend ACLs, key rotation, or data visibility. Trigger with "secure Algolia", "Algolia key audit", or "Algolia security review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and harden Anima and Figma tokens for design-to-code pipelines. Use when protecting API credentials, restricting Figma access scope, or hardening CI/CD design automation pipelines. Trigger with: "anima security", "anima token safety", "figma token security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish least privilege, credential rotation, webhook authenticity, signed-URL custody, log minimization, and destructive-action controls. Use when designing or hardening Adobe integrations. Trigger with "secure Adobe integration", "rotate Adobe secret", or "verify Adobe webhook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Abridge deployment controls across data handling, identity, devices, EHR workflows, support, auditability, and incident response. Use when conducting a security assessment or control renewal. Trigger with "audit Abridge security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to pull SEC EDGAR data with the edgartools Python package — company lookup, filings, XBRL financial statements, and filing sections like Item 1A risk factors. Use whenever a task involves SEC filings, 10-K/10-Q data, or company financials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods section", "how to report my statistics", "what do I need to include in methods for [study type]", or "make my methods CONSORT-compliant".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating crypto through a Grayscale-style Crypto Sectors lens: sector taxonomy, FTSE/Grayscale index eligibility, fee/usage fundamentals, sector-share valuation, ETP/trust wrappers, and Zcash-style privacy-as-money theses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when converting natural language flight commands into waypoints and timing for a drone simulator. Covers parsing commands like "Take off to X m height in Y seconds", "Hover at X m height for Y seconds", "Fly from (x,y,z) to (x',y',z') in T seconds", and "Land from X m height in Y seconds" into structured (4×n) waypoint arrays and segment mode lists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WooYun business logic vulnerability methodology — 22,132 real cases across 6 domains (authentication bypass, authorization bypass, payment tampering, information disclosure, logic flaws, misconfiguration) and 33 vulnerability classes. Use for ANY security testing, auditing, or code review of web apps, APIs, or business systems — even without explicit "security" keywords. Triggers: penetration testing, security audit, vulnerability, bug bounty, payment security, IDOR, password reset, weak credentials, unauthorized access, race condition, parameter tampering, code review, 渗透测试, 安全审计, 漏洞挖掘, 支付安全, 越权, 逻辑漏洞, 业务安全, SRC, 代码审计. Also triggers on implicit intent: "test this endpoint", "find bugs", "can I bypass this", "帮我测测这个接口", "这个参数能不能改", "帮我找bug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in threat modeling methodologies, security architecture review, and risk assessment. Masters STRIDE, PASTA, attack trees, and security requirement extraction. Use for security architecture reviews, threat identification, and secure-by-design planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a security expert specializing in dependency vulnerability analysis, SBOM generation, and supply chain security. Scan project dependencies across ecosystems to identify vulnerabilities, assess risks, and recommend remediation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。