「systematic」の検索結果

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) and parallel evidence-gatherers (across evidence classes), then synthesizes into a matrix, diagnosticity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mutation testing workflow. Systematically mutates source code to verify tests actually catch bugs. Multi-session with progress tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Premium UI/UX design audit and refinement skill. Conducts systematic visual audits of existing apps and produces phased, implementation-ready design plans. Use this skill whenever the user asks to audit a UI, improve an app's visual design, make an interface feel more polished or premium, review design consistency, fix visual hierarchy, or refine spacing/typography/color. Also trigger when the user says "design review", "make it look better", "UI polish", "visual refinement", "design pass", "audit the design", or references making an app feel more professional. This skill is purely visual — it does not touch functionality, logic, or features. It elevates what exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically document research findings, competitive analysis, market trends, and user insights in Notion. Build searchable research repository for data-driven decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug React hooks infinite loops, stale closures, and missing dependencies. Systematic approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA-tests a web app and fixes bugs: test, then iteratively fix, re-verify, commit each fix. Tiers: Quick, Standard, Exhaustive. Produces before/after health scores and fix evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic root-cause debugging that produces a diagnostic report (mk:fix applies the fix; mk:build-fix owns compile failures). Use for 'debug this', 'why is this broken', 'root cause'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior. Enforces a strict reproduce-first, root-cause-first, failing-test-first debugging workflow before fixing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert debugger for Next.js + Cloudflare Workers + Supabase stacks. Systematic troubleshooting for auth, caching, workers, RLS, CORS, and build issues. Activate on: 'debug', 'not working', 'error', 'broken', '500', '401', '403', 'cache issue', 'RLS', 'CORS'. NOT for: feature development (use language skills), architecture design (use system-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Long-running design anthropologist that builds comprehensive visual databases from 500-1000 real-world examples, extracting color palettes, typography patterns, layout systems, and interaction design across any domain (portfolios, e-commerce, SaaS, adult content, technical showcases). This skill should be used when users need exhaustive design research, pattern recognition across large example sets, or systematic visual analysis for competitive positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and counteract cognitive biases in medical decision-making through systematic error analysis and contextual algorithm application. For diagnostic reasoning, treatment decisions, and clinical judgment improvement. NOT for basic medical knowledge, technical procedures, or non-clinical healthcare domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic framework for resurrecting and modernizing legacy codebases through archaeology, resurrection, and rejuvenation phases. Activate on "legacy code", "inherited codebase", "no documentation", "technical debt", "resurrect", "modernize". NOT for greenfield projects or well-documented active codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret a Medtronic CareLink or MiniMed 780G Daily Review download in a structured 6-step clinical workflow — covering Time in Range, insulin delivery, day/night patterns, hypo and hyperglycemia root causes, and a prioritised action plan. Trigger when a clinician uploads or shares a CareLink report, MiniMed download, 780G Daily Review, pump download, or asks to review a patient's CGM or insulin pump data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify like Fable 5 — obsessive, systematic, evidence-based quality assurance woven into your reasoning. Use this skill when you have just written or modified code, need to confirm something works, are running tests, or need to validate output against requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug like Fable 5 — systematic root cause analysis with natural reasoning flow. Use this skill when you encounter an error, unexpected behavior, failing tests, or anything that does not work as intended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。