「trust」の検索結果

Authoritative reference for Pi (@earendil-works/pi-coding-agent): install, configure, run, and extend it. Use for the CLI and configuration, providers and models, extensions, skills, MCP, codemode, the SDK/RPC, security and trust, design philosophy, and the pi repository's internals and contribution rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于信托领域财富与家族信托中的保险金信托匹配助手场景。支持结构化输入处理、规则分析与Markdown结果输出。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research advisor for ACT business setup — Pty Ltd registration, accountants, insurance, R&D tax incentive, family trusts, compliance, and migration. Use when the user asks about any business setup topic, costs, providers, or next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How nutrition science becomes dietary guidance, and how industry, agriculture, and politics shape that process. Covers the US Dietary Guidelines cycle, food labeling, WIC and SNAP, commodity subsidies, and the documented history of industry influence on research and recommendations. Use when a question asks why a guideline says what it says, how a recommendation got written, or whether an industry-funded study should be trusted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating online information for credibility, accuracy, and context. Covers the SIFT method (Stop, Investigate, Find, Trace), lateral reading, reverse image search, primary source verification, and common misinformation tactics. Use when assessing the trustworthiness of a web page, article, video, social media post, or any digital claim before relying on it or sharing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security hygiene for GSD's self-modifying skill and agent system. Use this skill whenever: creating, editing, or deleting skill files (.claude/skills/, .claude/commands/), modifying agent definitions (.claude/agents/), working with YAML configuration or chipset files, handling JSONL observation data (.planning/patterns/), processing community-contributed skills or chipsets, any file path operations that could involve user input, or when installing/updating project-claude configuration. Also activates for discussions about skill-creator security, trust models, or content hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform STRIDE threat modeling for each component and trust boundary and produce a threat register. Use when reviewing a feature for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks what to do next, asks for a plan under uncertainty, challenges stalled or low-trust work, requests multiple possible approaches before action, or needs an evidence-first loop that uses RT-ICA-style prerequisite checks, adversarial review, subagent coordination, real validation, and durable concern tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures CI/CD pipelines for automated Python package publishing to PyPI or GitLab Package Registry. Use when creating GitHub Actions or GitLab CI release workflows, setting up trusted publishing or API token-based PyPI authentication, configuring version management with git tags and hatch-vcs, writing pyproject.toml publishing metadata, testing packages against TestPyPI, or documenting the release process for a Python project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Economic identity and reputation system for autonomous agents on Base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roll out governed MotherDuck analytics to internal teams, choosing trusted datasets, access boundaries, and owners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AuthCrunch security boundaries, triage vulnerability reports and scanner findings, reproduce authentication or authorization failures, and prepare evidence-backed remediation. Covers trust, credentials, redirects, concurrency, diagnostic logging, and dependency exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the pure-Go SQLite single-use ticket identity provider, public parser, trusted issuance API, HTTP login capability, cookie and realm binding, portal signing, and TLS consumer tests. Excludes OAuth/SAML protocols and anonymous ticket issuance services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has written (or wants to write) a `ModularPipelineBlocks` subclass in a local Python file and needs to package it into a Hub-uploadable directory. Covers the workflow from a single `block.py` file to a published custom-block repo that consumers can load via `ModularPipeline.from_pretrained(<repo>, trust_remote_code=True)`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit or harden security in this repo — e.g. "security audit", "auditoría de seguridad", "revisa la seguridad", "is this secure", "hardening", "vulnerabilities". Audits code, config, workflows, and secrets exposure. Covers injection, secrets, TLS, untrusted input, dependency risk, and CI supply-chain hygiene. Runs when the user asks about security, not just for code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kubernetes API analysis, service-account trust, RBAC edges, admission and controller behavior, cluster secrets, workload mutation, and namespace-scoped drift. Use when the user asks to inspect kube API permissions, service-account tokens, RoleBinding or ClusterRoleBinding edges, admission webhooks, controller-created pods, secret exposure, or why live workloads differ from manifests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Active Directory, Kerberos, LDAP, OAuth, enterprise messaging, Windows host forensics, credential material, and lateral-movement challenges. Use when the user asks to trace tickets or tokens, inspect mailbox rules, analyze Windows host evidence, understand an AD trust path, or explain a lateral-movement chain across sandbox-linked nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for firmware images, partition tables, boot chains, update packages, extracted filesystems, embedded configs, and device-facing trust boundaries. Use when the user asks to unpack firmware, map partition layout, inspect bootloader or init chains, recover update keys or credentials, trace config loading, or explain how a device surface reaches the decisive artifact. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Android APK hooking, Frida tracing, request-signing recovery, SSL pinning bypass, JNI boundary inspection, and app trust-boundary analysis. Use when the user asks to hook an APK, inspect signer logic, trace Java or native boundaries, bypass pinning or root checks, inspect shared prefs or app databases, or replay accepted mobile requests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for cloud metadata services, instance identity, workload identity, link-local credential paths, role assumption, and metadata-to-privilege trust edges. Use when the user asks to inspect metadata-service access, instance credentials, pod or workload identity, link-local token paths, SSRF-to-metadata escalation, or explain how metadata-derived credentials turn into accepted cloud or control-plane privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。