「ui」の検索結果

Extract a DDD-style ubiquitous language glossary from the current conversation, flagging ambiguities and proposing canonical terms. Saves to UBIQUITOUS_LANGUAGE.md. Use when user wants to define domain terms, build a glossary, harden terminology, create a ubiquitous language, or mentions "domain model" or "DDD".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated constraints for building better web interfaces with coding agents. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to build, review, or fix a UI — landing pages, dashboards, components, or any frontend code — and whenever you write Tailwind CSS, motion/react animations, accessible component primitives (Base UI, React Aria, Radix), or review agent-generated interface code for quality, accessibility, and performance. Also trigger for "make the UI better", "review my interface", "clean up this component", or any frontend work in React, Next.js, or plain HTML/CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gere documentação de arquitetura usando diagramas C4 model Mermaid. Use quando solicitado criar diagramas de arquitetura, documentar arquitetura de sistema, visualizar estrutura de software, criar diagramas C4, ou gerar diagramas de contexto/container/componente/deployment. Triggers incluem "diagrama de arquitetura", "diagrama C4", "contexto do sistema", "diagrama de container", "diagrama de componente", "diagrama de deployment", "documentar arquitetura", "visualizar arquitetura".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visual Stack's primary tool. Build a UI wireframe and open it in an interactive review workspace where the user comments directly on the page, turning those comments into the next iteration — or point the same workspace at an app that is already running and review the real thing. Use when the user wants a wireframe, UI mockup, screen design or prototype built; wants to review, annotate, mark up or comment on a page, a design, an existing UI, a running app or a website; wants to iterate on a UI; asks to use Visual Stack; or invokes $vstack:review, /vstack:review, or the older /vstack:wireframe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building styled UI with @nuxt/ui v4 components (Button, Modal, Form, Table, etc.) - provides ready-to-use components with Tailwind Variants theming. Use vue skill for raw component patterns, reka-ui for headless primitives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

本番と同じ失敗を本番前に検出するためのテスト階層設計スキル。 DB方言差、実依存関係、永続化確認、timezone差、packaging整合性、 adversarial regressionをunit/integration/e2e/smoke/packagingに 適切に割り振り、PR CIで最低限の本番同等性を保証する。 Use when designing production-parity tests, closing test blind spots, building smoke suites for real dependencies, verifying persistence beyond UI success, or creating adversarial regression backlogs.

Professional business analysis skill aligned with BABOK® Guide v3 standards. Use this skill when you need to elicit and document requirements, analyze business processes, conduct stakeholder analysis, develop business cases, perform gap analysis, or create business requirements documents (BRD). Ideal for requirements gathering, process mapping (BPMN), financial analysis (ROI, NPV), stakeholder engagement, and solution evaluation. Triggers: "gather requirements", "create business case", "analyze process", "stakeholder analysis", "gap analysis", "BRD", "functional requirements", or requests involving business analysis tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SDDワークフロー全体を統括するオーケストレーター。要求管理・タスク計画・実装・逆順レビューの一連のフローを管理する。複数フェーズにまたがるワークフロー管理、エラー・バグの体系的な分析と修正に使用する。要求は requirement-management、設計はPR本文が既定の記録先であり、requirements-defining と software-designing は非推奨。Do NOT use for 個別フェーズのみの作業（requirement-management、task-planningを直接使用すること）。

Reconstructed reference notes on US FAA approval guidance for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware, built from four public-domain sources (FAA Order 8110.49A, AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, AC 00-69; documents dated 2017-07-21 to 2022-10-07, pinned 2026-10-12). Use for how FAA certification staff plan and conduct software reviews (certification liaison, desk versus on-site review, review planning agreements), how the level of FAA involvement (LOI) is picked and scored with the Appendix A worksheets, how software conformity inspection works (software part and installation conformity, ASE and ASI tasks, Form 8120-10), what AC 20-115D recognizes and how DO-178B processes and tool qualification transition to DO-178C/DO-330 (supplements, FLS, UMS, legacy software changes), and what AC 20-152A adds for airborne electronic hardware (simple versus complex custom devices, robustness and HDL code coverage, tool assessment, previously developed hardware, COTS IP, COTS devices, circuit board assemblies), and what AC 00-69 adds as best practices for change impact analysis, data and control coupling, and design-level error handling (best practices, not guidance and not a means of compliance). SCOPE LIMITS: FAA guidance only, and guidance is not regulation (ACs are acceptable means, not the only means); no RTCA DO-178C or DO-254, EUROCAE ED-12C or ED-80, supplement, or SAE ARP text, which are copyrighted and named only (see the avionics-signpost pack); no AC 00-72 (named, not packed); no DO-178C software-level objective tables; no EASA AMC 20-115D or AMC 20-152A content (use easa-rules); reflects the pinned source dates, not later FAA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the source documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute DAG-based automation workflows using the NV oOS Pro Workflow Builder — a ReactFlow visual builder for chaining tool calls, agent runs, and actions into repeatable pipelines. Covers the visual builder UI, 9 preset categories, 10 node types, Kahn's algorithm execution engine, scheduling via Pro Schedule Manager, template variable syntax, and best practices. Use when designing workflows, debugging DAG execution failures, choosing between a workflow schedule and raw tool chaining, or building CRM/PM automation pipelines with toolkit_cpt nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute DAG-based automation workflows using the NV oOS Pro Workflow Builder — a ReactFlow visual builder for chaining tool calls, agent runs, and actions into repeatable pipelines. Covers the visual builder UI, 10 preset categories (incl. AI Fashion Production, v1.1.92+), 10 node types, Kahn's algorithm execution engine, scheduling via Pro Schedule Manager, template variable syntax, and best practices. Use when designing workflows, debugging DAG execution failures, choosing between a workflow schedule and raw tool chaining, or building CRM/PM automation pipelines with toolkit_cpt nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.

TidyFactor Design track — code-native UI design lifecycle engine (Figma alternative). Supports all 7 stages of UI design (Discovery, Foundation, Architecture, Components, Motion, Quality, Delivery) with zero per-page CSS/JS and zero build step. Pluggable CSS foundations (Native, Tailwind utility-first, daisyUI, Hybrid, shadcn, Pico, Bootstrap, Alpine) and full Arabic/RTL support (El Messiri/Tajawal, never Amiri above 24px). Trigger on commands "study", "brief", "init", "brand", "typography", "school", "tokens", "palette", "assets", "layout", "nav-footer", "components", "page", "dashboard", "motion", "states", "flow", "i18n", "perf", "audit", "clone", "retrofit", "handoff", "deploy", or requests like "build a design system", "UI design lifecycle", "prototype this website", "Figma alternative", "نموذج أولي تفاعلي", "صمّم لوحة تحكم".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building UI, components, motion icons, loaders, or visual design. In BDB projects, routes to the BDB component and motion-icon library (npm @hybridlabor-api/ui-motion-library, shadcn namespace @bdb) as the first source before third-party registries or building from scratch. Outside BDB projects, the same lookup order applies with the original sources listed in the bdb-ui-library repository docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Buildkite — buildkite CI/CD pipeline and agent management. Covers build pipeline status, agent pool health, artifact management, build annotations, and cluster queue monitoring. Use when checking build status, investigating failures, managing agents, or reviewing pipeline configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Cargo — cargo Rust build and package management. Covers build configuration, workspace management, feature flags, build profiles, cross-compilation, and build script analysis. Use when managing Cargo workspaces, configuring build profiles, debugging compilation issues, or optimizing build performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X (Twitter) Scraper API and X API Alternative instructions for Xquik scraping and connected X account action planning. Also use for Xquik Radar or Xquik support tickets only when the user names that feature. Do not load or use this Skill for official X developer setup unless the user compares it with Xquik. Trigger when an X or Twitter task asks about posts, replies, likes, follows, messages, search, users, timelines, followers, exports, giveaways, draws, monitors, Xquik webhooks, MCP setup, SDKs, or API comparisons. Start read-only. Require confirmation for write plans, private reads, monitors, webhooks, support access, and metered bulk jobs. Not affiliated with X Corp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI coding guidelines covering style, structure, patterns, formatting, and pure-functions methodology. Use when editing or generating SwiftUI code or Swift files containing SwiftUI views, view models, services, or related architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build SwiftUI views with modern MV architecture, state management, and view composition patterns. Covers @Observable ownership rules, @State/@Bindable/@Environment wiring, view decomposition, custom ViewModifiers, environment values, async data loading with .task, iOS 26+ APIs, Writing Tools, and performance guidelines. Use when structuring a SwiftUI app, managing state with @Observable, composing view hierarchies, or applying SwiftUI best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。