2,074 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validate the replication package for the sewage-house-prices project. Runs 10 checks covering script execution, file integrity, output freshness, dependency verification, data provenance, and README completeness (AEA format). This skill should be used when asked to "audit replication", "check the package", or "verify reproducibility".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, conducting literature reviews, finding related work, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, citation verification workflows, and paper discovery/evaluation criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal Meta-Analysis Codebook v2.2 - AI-Human collaboration for meta-analysis data extraction. 4-layer design: Identifiers, Statistics, AI Provenance, Human Verification. Integrates with C5/C6/C7 agents and Category I systematic review pipeline. Triggers: meta-analysis, codebook, data extraction, Hedges g, effect size
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify references in an academic paper: check whether each BibTeX entry is real, whether in-text citations match the cited paper's actual content, and produce a structured verification report. Use when user says "验证参考文献", "ref verify", "check references", "核实引用", "引用是否正确", or wants to audit citations in a LaTeX manuscript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write publication-ready ML/AI/Systems papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM, OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta/Facebook/Instagram Ads campaign structure analysis detecting creative fatigue, audience overlap, scaling opportunities, and iOS tracking verification issues. Use when pasting Meta account data, analyzing Facebook ad performance, reviewing Instagram campaigns, or requesting audit of social advertising spend. Platform: Meta.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Browser Automation BB plugin to inspect and automate persistent browser pages in an explicit desktop or local headless session. Use for browser navigation, snapshots, clicking, forms, and verification screenshots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a nontrivial change needs end-to-end verification before committing or shipping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to declare work complete, fixed, passing, or done
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug a reproducible symptom with a bounded feedback loop and original-scenario verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch OpenAI Codex CLI as a subagent (no API key). Use when delegating a self-contained coding task to Codex from another agent — parallel implementation work, a second opinion, or an independent verification pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list with a shape verdict, fixes on approval. Use for "review this PR", "/pr-review 3011", or a pre-flight self-review before submitting; add "thorough" for adversarial verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to verify CLAIM-LEVEL grounding of a documentation page (or set of pages) against the source code. Activate when you have specific pages to check for factual accuracy -- not when sweeping a whole corpus (use docs-corpus-audit for that) and not when triaging a PR diff (use docs-sync for that). Trigger nouns: "is this doc accurate", "verify the page against the code", "fact-check this section", "any claims that drifted from source", "fact-checking", "grounding audit", "drift hunt", "claim verification". Returns per-claim verdicts (GROUNDED | PARTIAL | CONTRADICTED | UNSUPPORTED) with file:line evidence citations. Catches paragraph-level inaccuracies that page-level audit averages over -- e.g. a paragraph with 5 claims where 4 are grounded and 1 is fabricated. Does NOT modify files (returns advisory only); does NOT re-architect the docs; does NOT triage PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read 微信公众号 articles from mp.weixin.qq.com links using available web or browser tools. Report verification walls honestly; reading alone does not modify notes or queues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative diagnose-and-fix workflow that repeatedly uses the diagnose skill to find a proven problem, plan the smallest credible improvement, implement it, re-diagnose, and continue until no useful fix remains or user intervention is required. Requires the diagnose skill; selected installs must also install diagnose. Use when asked to keep debugging, fix and verify, iterate until satisfied, improve after diagnosis, or run a diagnosis/fix/verification loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wiring Verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formal theorem proving with research, testing, and verification phases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit workflow - vulnerability scan → verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement technical plans from thoughts/shared/plans with verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。