「voc」の検索結果

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and manage brand communities — engagement strategy, moderation, advocacy programs, and community-led growth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes advisory editorial style diagnostics (sentence-length variation, configured phrase lists, vocabulary sampling) that never infer authorship or affect scoring. Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage writing personas with NNGroup 4-dimension tone framework (Funny-Serious, Formal-Casual, Respectful-Irreverent, Enthusiastic-Matter-of-fact). Personas define readability targets, sentence length distribution, vocabulary tier, contraction frequency, and summary box label. Used by blog-write and blog-rewrite to enforce consistent voice. Use when user says "persona", "voice", "tone", "writing style", "brand voice", "create persona", "use persona".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing how an Agentforce agent extracts structured input parameters (slots) from a user's natural-language utterance to invoke an action. Triggers: 'agent extract date from user', 'agent action argument extraction', 'agentforce slot filling', 'agent invocable input mapping', 'agent fails to fill required parameter'. NOT for action authoring (use agentforce/agent-actions) or for prompt-template variable binding (use agentforce/prompt-builder-templates).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding which Salesforce automation tool should own a requirement, including before-save and after-save Flow, screen Flow, scheduled Flow, invocable Apex, Apex triggers, and migration off Workflow Rules or Process Builder. Triggers: 'Flow or Apex trigger', 'which automation tool should I use', 'Process Builder migration', 'Workflow Rule retirement', 'same-record update or trigger', 'automation decision record', 'why did we reject Apex', 'one object one order', 'automation inventory for this object', 'scheduled Flow or Batch Apex'. NOT for 'which tool should stamp this field on save, and will it recurse' — use admin/workflow-field-update-patterns. NOT for actually running the conversion of an existing Process Builder — use flow/process-builder-to-flow-migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Custom Notification Types for desktop/mobile push alerts from Flow or Apex: type creation, target channels, Messaging.CustomNotification invocation, recipient limits, bulk notification patterns. NOT for choosing channels, consent, or notification-fatigue policy — use admin/custom-notification-type-design. NOT for email alerts — use admin/email-templates-and-alerts. Trigger keywords: notiftype, notificationtypes directory, customNotifTypeName, customNotificationAction, setNotificationTypeId, targetPageRef, NotificationTypeConfig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the coding agents installed on this machine (claude, codex, droid, grok, vktr, hermes, opencode, copilot, pi) as plain sub-agents in orchestrated workflows: one headless invocation, one prompt in, one result out. Deliberately ignores each CLI's own orchestration features (droid --mission, codex multi_agent, hermes delegation/moa/kanban, grok --agents, opencode personas). The orchestrator is whatever session is running the skill; the CLIs are interchangeable workers. Use when the user asks "which agent should run this", "fan out workers", "run X headless", or when a lifeos skill (overnight, timeboxed-iterating, workgraph, gauntlet, bughunt, dark-factory) needs to launch an agent CLI, or when a worker needs company context it should ask Viktor for (vktr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide to Japanese Language Proficiency Test preparation with strategies for vocabulary, kanji, grammar, reading, and listening across all levels

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Good-faith adversarial scrutiny of an idea or plan. Spawns critical skeptics across relevant lenses, pairs them with an advocate defending the idea, and synthesizes the exchange into a report. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial deliberation process for making decisions. Spawns advocate agents for each option who argue their cases before a judge (you) who renders a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without knowing its name and wants the right word to prompt an AI or designer with. For naming an effect, not designing or building one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map every touchpoint from first click to loyal advocate. Identify drop-off points, emotional peaks, and automation opportunities across your entire customer lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove — or honestly fail to prove — a specific technical claim: "the fix works", "it's deployed", "the service is running", "the site is done", "there are no vulnerabilities". Atomizes the claim, picks the shortest decisive signal on the evidence ladder, and returns a verdict from a fixed vocabulary (pass / partial / fail / skip) with an explicit coverage boundary. NOT code review, NOT a fix, NOT orchestration — only "what is proven, and what we merely hope". Triggers — "prove it works", "is it really done?", "are you sure?", "we deployed — is it live?", "verify that", "did we actually check?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an analytical longform piece — a 4-phase pipeline from raw idea to finished text, with research-backed facts and a devil's-advocate pass before publishing. Invoke /longread <topic>. Triggers — "write a longread about X", "write an analytical breakdown of Y", "write an expert post", "turn this into an article".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstraps a new project end to end: research, design, plan, scaffold, implement, docs. Explicit invocation only. NOT for autonomous builds (mk:autobuild); NOT for existing-repo work (mk:cook).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating a new project from scratch — orchestrates the full journey from idea to running code. Research → design → plan → scaffold → implement → docs. Explicit invocation only — never auto-activates. CLI = project infrastructure (.claude/), bootstrap = application code + full pipeline. NOT for autonomous multi-hour builds of specified products (see mk:autobuild); NOT for single-task feature work on existing projects (see mk:cook).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent structured debate with anti-groupthink mechanisms — Devil's Advocate, minority opinion protection, 2-round hard cap. Use when divergent perspectives matter more than consensus (architecture decisions, design tradeoffs, contested specifications).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On explicit /homework invocation, analyze the current and linked previous sessions, extract mistakes (찐빠), and report them via omcustom-feedback with a confirmation gate. Auto-activation on session cleanup/session-end signals is OPT-IN (default OFF) — requires an explicit project/user directive. Use when explicitly auditing recent work for harness gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial dialectic tool inspired by GAN. Alternates between Generator (creative advocate) and Discriminator (adversarial critic). Supports forced role selection (g/d), intensity modes (hard/soft), and multi-language output. Use for stress-testing ideas, business plans, code, and spec designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for coordinating meaning across autonomous agents that use different conceptual models, vocabularies, and knowledge representations. Treats ontologies as first-class negotiable resources rather than hardcoded implementation details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。