6,090 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review someone else's pull request by measuring which of its own guards its own test suite actually catches, via a small mutation matrix. Use when reviewing a PR, checking whether a regression test is real, or asked 'is this change actually tested?', 'does this test do anything', 'mutation test this'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open-source one slice of a private system: take a component, sanitize it, run a leak-scan as a hard gate, publish to GitHub, then changelog, roadmap and tag on cadence, then the content wave. Publishing without passing the leak-scan is forbidden. Triggers: "/release-slice <piece>", "ship the next slice".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Recover deleted, edited or historical web content using the Wayback Machine and its CDX API, archive.today, Common Crawl… Use when a page is deleted, changed or 404s, checking what a site used to say, finding old team or staff pages, prior pricing, removed posts, pre-redaction wording or old contact details, enumerating every archived URL for a domain, or preserving evidence before it disappears
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a website codebase and makes code changes so AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) can better discover, parse, quote, and cite the site. Covers structured data, content structure, technical signals, and freshness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report what is genuinely new in the last 30 days on a topic, by slicing locally collected nightly channel databases with no live crawling. Run it before a strategic decision, as the fresh-signal feed for the gap phase. Triggers: "/last30days <topic>", "trendwatch <topic>", "what changed last 30 days on X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Gemini as a third external reviewer alongside two other vendors: diff review with an APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES verdict, and QA-breaker duty in the post-build test ritual. Headless over REST with a CLI fallback, and verdicts go to a shared usage journal. Triggers: "/gemini review", "gemini opinion on this diff".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-vendor code review: this agent reviews the other agent's diff and the other agent reviews this one's, so the final check always comes from a different model. Verdicts are APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES with file:line references. Triggers: "/codex-review", "cross-review this diff", "have the other vendor check this".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a live website for AI-engine discoverability (AEO/GEO). Crawls the site, runs 16 deterministic checks plus a 6-dimension content evaluation, and produces a scored report (A-F) with prioritized fixes. Use to get a baseline before improve-aeo-geo, or to measure progress after changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an autonomous consensus round between agent peers on several machines: they negotiate a decision over a shared channel and execute it without a human relaying messages. Use when multiple machines must agree on a change. Triggers: "/03", "work it out among yourselves", "find consensus". Wakes the human only for irreversible actions or a deadlock.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuild the canon mirror for a second coding agent (AGENTS.md) after a rules-file version bump: show the changelog delta, write in only the new rules, then enforce the size cap, version stamp, structural anchors, a copy into the shared folder and the linter run. Triggers: "/codex-mirror", "update the codex mirror", "AGENTS.md is stale".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull new and changed claude.ai web conversations into an Obsidian vault, extract artifacts as first-class notes, concept-link them, and refresh the RAG index and dashboard. Idempotent: curated notes are never overwritten. Triggers: "/claudeai-sync", "pull claude.ai", "grab new claude.ai chats".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map repository structure, likely tests, git state, and write scope before edits. Use when asked for repo mapping, blast radius, file inventory, or change planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Merge dev branch into master/main and push. Use when dev changes are ready for production branch. Invoked by saying "merge to master" or "merge to main".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document completed work — update task log, sync documentation, log observations. Use after finishing a task or batch of changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stage, commit, and push code changes with branch safety and explicit staging. Use when ready to commit work. Invoked by saying "commit", "push", or "commit and push".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continuous production path for deployless repositories. Use after mainline governance and release controls exist, when a repo needs CI/CD changes to automatically deploy, publish, or promote artifacts from main across any language, runtime, or hosting platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use as an independent design-review pass after rendering a website; evaluates macro, meso, micro craft, applies the Design Quality rubric, identifies root causes, and prioritizes changes without defending the implementation intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remote-sensing literature search, citation verification, sensor/platform/dataset query strategy, citation file management (.ris/.bib/.enw conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, DOI/arXiv lookup) across CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and domain web sources. Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows for remote sensing, Earth observation, geospatial AI, GIScience, photogrammetry, SAR, hyperspectral imaging, LiDAR, satellite missions, benchmark datasets, land-cover mapping, change detection, object detection, segmentation, retrieval, or multimodal remote-sensing foundation models. Also trigger on general literature-search needs during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as searching for papers/literature, doing a literature review, verifying a citation, converting citation files, and Chinese phrasings like 文献检索、查文献、找文献、 文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two MIKE+ runs via the mike-plus MCP server — baseline vs scenario, before vs after a parameter edit — to say WHERE a change mattered and BY HOW MUCH (delta peak, delta volume, timing shift, RMSE/NSE) and to draw the overlay hydrograph. Use whenever two .res1d files of the same model exist or a re-run just finished. Comparing needs no license; producing the second run does.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review API contract tests across providers and consumers. Use for schema changes, compatibility regressions and client integration failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author and validate nvoos-chart fenced-JSON chart blocks for NV oOS chat surfaces — 29 chart types across distribution, part-to-whole, ranking, change, special and grid families. Covers type selection, the v2 schema (values/series/data.items, mode, sort, direction, unit, animate, table, target), data-shape rules, the create_chart_fence server validator, the a11y checklist, and copy-paste JSON templates. Use when writing chart fences in assistant responses, choosing a chart type for data, validating chart JSON, or deciding between nvoos-chart, create_chart, generate_chart and generate_mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when migrating a CopilotKit v1 application to v2 -- updating package imports, replacing deprecated hooks and components, switching from GraphQL runtime to AG-UI protocol runtime, and resolving breaking API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to update, refresh, or reinstall the CopilotKit agent SKILLS (the SKILL.md files that teach this agent about CopilotKit). NOT for updating the CopilotKit codebase or project — this is specifically about refreshing the skills/knowledge this agent has loaded. Triggers on "update copilotkit skills", "update skills", "refresh skills", "skills are stale", "skills are outdated", "get latest skills", "my copilotkit knowledge is wrong", "copilotkit APIs changed", "skills seem old", "wrong API names", "reinstall skills", "skills not working right", "update your copilotkit knowledge".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**MANDATORY for ALL MCP server work** - mcp-use framework best practices and patterns. **READ THIS FIRST** before any MCP server work, including: - Creating new MCP servers - Modifying existing MCP servers (adding/updating tools, resources, prompts, widgets) - Debugging MCP server issues or errors - Reviewing MCP server code for quality, security, or performance - Answering questions about MCP development or mcp-use patterns - Making ANY changes to server.tool(), server.resource(), server.prompt(), or widgets This skill contains critical architecture decisions, security patterns, and common pitfalls. Always consult the relevant reference files BEFORE implementing MCP features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。