「can」の検索結果

Validate OpenClaw release candidates through OCM using the built OpenClaw artifact, a broad reusable scenario matrix, copied existing-user state, clean new-user state, concise pass/fail reporting, and focused failure notes. Use when asked to test OpenClaw origin/main, release readiness, upgrade behavior, plugins, services, channels, doctor recovery, packaging, or broad release risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed elevator mechanic — diagnosing a governor or safety-circuit fault, planning or witnessing a Category 1/Category 5 periodic test, sequencing an elevator or escalator installation/modernization to code, or deciding whether equipment can stay in service pending a repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track/tenured Education Professor in a teacher-preparation program — designing a licensure course unit against InTASC/CAEP standards, deciding whether a candidate's borderline edTPA score needs a targeted or full retake, triaging a failing student-teaching placement, or assembling CAEP self-study evidence for reaccreditation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an emergency medicine physician — risk-stratifying an undifferentiated chief complaint against a can't-miss diagnosis, deciding an ED disposition (discharge/observation/admit/transfer) under time and bed pressure, reasoning through EMTALA screening-and-stabilization obligations, or triaging a department under crowding/boarding load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Science Professor — deciding whether a field exercise crosses a weather/safety cancel threshold, building an NSF/EPA proposal budget, normalizing an interdisciplinary tenure case against the right benchmark, checking whether a mixed-methods field project needs IRB review, or handling a politically charged classroom topic without losing academic-freedom footing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Door-to-Door Sales Worker — planning a canvassing route or street-vending spot, diagnosing a rep's or vendor's underperformance from doors/contacts/sits/close ratios, navigating solicitation-permit or curfew or cooling-off compliance, structuring a doorstep pitch and objection handling, or reconciling a shift's cash and inventory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a dermatologist — triaging a pigmented lesion for melanoma risk, choosing a biopsy technique and reading the pathology in clinical context, staging a skin cancer to decide margins or Mohs referral, escalating psoriasis/eczema treatment by severity score, or managing isotretinoin risk under REMS/iPLEDGE rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a cytotechnologist — screening a gynecologic (Pap test) slide and applying Bethesda System criteria, assessing non-gynecologic specimen adequacy (FNA rapid on-site evaluation, body fluid, brushing) against the relevant reporting system, deciding whether a finding can be signed out independently or must be referred to a pathologist, or auditing screening quality metrics (ASC:SIL ratio, rescreen concordance, workload compliance). A reasoning aid, not a substitute for a certified cytotechnologist or pathologist signing out an actual case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dental Laboratory Technician — calculating wax pattern dimensions from a die measurement and alloy-specific casting shrinkage, rejecting a restoration built on a flawed impression or scan, verifying occlusal contacts against the articulator-mounted bite rather than sculpting by eye, or prioritizing value over hue when finalizing a shade match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Coating/Painting/Spraying Machine Operator — calculating wet film thickness from a target dry film thickness and the coating's percent volume solids, deciding whether flash-off time can be shortened to increase throughput, verifying cure by actual part temperature rather than oven setpoint, or tracing an adhesion failure back to surface prep rather than the coating application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Conveyor Operator — diagnosing a mistracking belt before it becomes edge damage or spillage, verifying every lockout/tagout isolation point on a conveyor with a gravity take-up or incline before entering the nip zone, calculating each conveyor's actual delivered capacity in a multi-conveyor line to find the true bottleneck, deciding whether a mechanical or vulcanized splice fits a given tension rating, or judging whether a pinch-point guarding gap needs an immediate stop versus a scheduled fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a CEO/chief executive — setting company strategy, allocating scarce resources (capital, headcount, attention) across competing priorities, making a call that only the top of the org can make, or communicating direction to the board, investors, or the whole company.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Child, Family, and School Social Worker — distinguishing an immediate child-safety determination from a longer-term risk assessment, deciding whether an in-home safety plan can control an identified danger versus removal being required, building a safety plan with specific and verifiable (not vague) elements, documenting a case contemporaneously and factually for a court-involved record, or engaging a family's specific context and strengths rather than a generic checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a radio broadcast announcer or on-air disc jockey — backtiming a live break against a hard network join or legal ID, deciding what to cut when a caller or breaking-news read runs long, judging FCC indecency/EAS exposure on live content, structuring a voice-tracked shift so it doesn't read as canned, or diagnosing why a daypart's PPM numbers are sliding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a certificated aircraft mechanic — triaging a maintenance discrepancy, deciding whether an item can be MEL-deferred or grounds the aircraft, working out an Airworthiness Directive's compliance deadline, reviewing a torque/safety-wire job before sign-off, or writing a return-to-service log entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Administrative Law Judge, Adjudicator, or Hearing Officer — applying a mandatory sequential/structured evaluation framework in required order, weighing conflicting medical or vocational opinion evidence using specific regulatory factors, writing findings that explicitly address significant contrary evidence in the record, drafting a credibility/consistency finding tied to specific record citations, or checking whether a draft decision would survive substantial-evidence review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install bioinformatics tools for ENCODE data analysis. Covers CLI tools (BWA, STAR, samtools, MACS2), R/Bioconductor packages (DESeq2, Seurat, ChIPseeker), Python packages (Scanpy, deeptools), and Nextflow pipeline infrastructure. Generates conda environments, R install scripts, and Python requirements. Use when the user needs to set up a bioinformatics workstation, install tools for a specific assay, create reproducible environments, or troubleshoot dependency issues. Trigger on: install tools, set up environment, conda create, bioinformatics setup, install R packages, install Bioconductor, install pipeline tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify chromatin states with ChromHMM, identify super-enhancers with ROSE, understand the functional validation hierarchy (CRISPR > MPRA > reporter), or characterize non-coding genomic regions. Covers the full workflow from ENCODE cCRE lookup through chromatin state segmentation to functional validation and enhancer-gene linkage. Use this skill for ANY regulatory element discovery, classification, or characterization task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess the scientific integrity and trustworthiness of publications before relying on their findings. Use this skill whenever evaluating a paper for a workflow, citing a study, building an analysis on published methods, or when a user asks about the reliability of a study. Checks for formal retractions, corrections, expressions of concern, and — critically — informal contradictions where subsequent studies failed to reproduce key findings. Integrates with PubMed, bioRxiv, and Consensus to provide a trust assessment. Use this skill for ANY publication evaluation, retraction checking, author reliability assessment, or when a user says "can I trust this paper", "is this study reliable", "has this been refuted", or "check this publication".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ENCODE functional genomics data for disease mechanism research. Use when the user wants to connect GWAS variants to regulatory elements, annotate disease-associated loci with functional data, identify therapeutic targets from epigenomic data, build disease regulatory models, cross-reference with clinical trials and drug databases, or conduct any disease-focused, pathology-driven, or clinical variant interpretation workflow. Covers the full pipeline from disease-tissue mapping through GWAS variant annotation, heritability enrichment, cancer epigenomics, drug target identification, and clinical trial cross-referencing. Integrates ENCODE with Open Targets, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and bioRxiv.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent code review using the Pragmatic Quality framework. Orchestrates parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scanning, git history, security) with independent confidence scoring to produce high-signal findings. Use when user runs /code-review, /review:code-review, requests a "code review", "review my changes", "PR review", or mentions "review diff", "review branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect documentation drift, stale references, and cross-document inconsistencies in any project. Scans for code-doc drift (API/function changes not reflected in docs), cross-doc drift (conflicting information across documents), and stale references (broken links, deleted files, outdated versions). Use when checking "doc freshness", "stale docs", "documentation drift", "broken links", "outdated documentation", "doc accuracy", "docs out of date", "doc audit", "doc health", or "verify documentation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lists local and remote git branches that are candidates for cleanup — merged but not deleted, and inactive branches with no commits in a configurable period (default 3 months). Use when user mentions "stale branches", "old branches", "branch cleanup", "prune branches", "dead branches", "unused branches", "inactive branches", "branch hygiene", or asks to "list branches to delete", "find stale branches", or runs /stale-branches command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。