6,442 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Approve a GitHub pull request, inferring the target from context when no PR is given. Use when the user invokes `$pr-approve`, asks to approve a PR, or approves a pull request mentioned earlier in the conversation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses failing GitHub Actions runs by reading logs, identifying the root cause, and suggesting fixes. Use this skill whenever a user shares a GHA run URL, pastes runner log output, mentions a failing workflow, asks why a CI job is broken, or says anything like "my GHA is failing", "workflow failed", "can you check my run", or "CI is broken". Also trigger when raw log text is detected in the conversation that appears to come from a GitHub Actions runner. Do NOT use for general GHA workflow authoring questions, YAML formatting help, or passing runs with no failure context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Git remote URL for GitHub integration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Git remote URL for GitHub integration
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map existing materials into a first knowledge record, or investigate a subject's history in depth. Use whenever the user asks to map, survey, go through, reconstruct or investigate what already exists - folders of documents, decision records, meeting notes, emails, exports, code - or wants a starting record built from existing materials, even when the word 'record' is never said: consult this before listing or reading the files yourself, because a map has an agreed scope, a protocol and a report. Also, once, at a suitable moment, to offer the starting choices where a workspace has no record and the work is clearly ongoing - never on a greeting. Learning while working needs no map. Requests come in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose GitHub bug reports in openai/codex. Use when given a GitHub issue URL from openai/codex and asked to decide next steps such as verifying against the repo, requesting more info, or explaining why it is not a bug; follow any additional user-provided instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn research, analysis, or any markdown the agent just produced into a live, beautifully designed web report with a shareable tracked URL via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "publish this", "make this shareable", "turn this into a report", "put this on a page", or wants findings to live beyond the chat. Not for recurring client deliverables (use client-reporter), slide decks (use deck-publisher), or proposals that need view alerts (use proposal-tracker).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn content into a responsive, presenter-friendly slide deck published at a live URL via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "make this a deck", "turn this into slides", "presentation for", or wants something to present rather than read. Not for long-form documents (use report-publisher) or polishing an existing deck (use report-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TypeScript-only skill for generating and debugging high-resolution AI images through sub2api OpenAI-compatible APIs. Use this whenever the user wants a TS/Node sub2api image generator, 4K image generation, stream=true /v1/images/generations or /v1/responses image generation, Cloudflare 524 timeout avoidance, partial image capture, or SUB2API_BASE_URL/SUB2API_API_KEY based image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when revising or reviewing scientific, technical, or academic manuscripts, proposals, abstracts, reports, or related writing for precision, concision, logical cohesion, citation support, evidence alignment, and objective scholarly tone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a cross-workspace import will not resolve — cannot find module @org/*, TS2307 — to link the packages properly with the workspace: protocol instead of patching tsconfig paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user shares a Sentry URL, says "check Sentry", or wants to investigate production errors. Uses Sentry MCP tools for deep analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when claiming 'done', suggesting a commit, push, or PR — runs the evidence gate so completion claims come from fresh output in this message, not memory or earlier runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before committing to a heavy or irreversible plan — imagine it's 6 months later and this failed; enumerate why, score each mode, derive early-warning signals and preventive guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring Laravel task scheduling — cron expressions, frequency helpers, overlap prevention, maintenance mode, or output handling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Paste a URL/snippet before you borrow it — detects its license, runs the derived compatibility policy, and drafts a provenance ledger entry — even before any code is written, not after
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep analysis of articles/long-form via thinking frameworks (SCQA, mental models, inversion) — 'analyze article', 'deep dive', 'extract insights', URL/text wanting depth not summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing churn defence — health-score signals, churn-cause split (involuntary / value / relationship / fit), early-warning loop. Triggers on 'why are accounts leaving'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Role-based collaboration pattern (Drafter, Reviewer, Breaker). Assigns roles to available agents via prompt parameters. Use when starting multi-agent dev work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodically inspect a sprint manager and worker sessions against a sprint spec, classify progress, nudge only for real stalls, and always append a checkpoint log beside the sprint file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Boot a four-agent visible-terminal team, get all four to "Ready to Rock!", lock live session names to roles, and launch a Lead/Reviewer/Breaker/Verifier sprint without mandate drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-round editorial review before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multiple agents draft a structured document through federated co-authorship and formal voting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combine independent work from two or more selected agents into one decision-ready research report, design, or proposal. Preserve useful complementary findings, develop stronger combined options, and present material alternatives only when they exist. Use when multiple perspectives should improve the product without forcing consensus or staging disagreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。