Star schema, snowflake schema, SCD types, and Kimball methodology for analytical data modeling. Activate on: dimensional model, star schema, snowflake schema, SCD, fact table, dimension table, Kimball, grain, surrogate key. NOT for: dbt implementation (use dbt-analytics-engineer), warehouse tuning (use data-warehouse-optimizer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Digital equity and trauma-informed design for marginalized populations. Activate on "accessibility", "offline-first", "trauma-informed", "reentry", "recovery population", "shared device", "unstable phone", "digital equity", "design justice", "low-literacy", "intermittent access". NOT for general UX, marketing optimization, or enterprise SaaS design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Review of Cognitive Systems Engineering applications and current practice in safety-critical domains
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Analyze undirected cycle structure within a valid DAG using the source paper's orientation and contraction method. Use for cycle-basis analysis with explicit graph and reduction choices. NOT for directed feedback loops, workflow deadlocks, or runtime resilience claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Design and implement systematic checklists that reduce errors by 30-50% in complex, high-stakes domains (medicine, aviation, construction, finance). NOT for simple tasks or when comprehensive instruction is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Conduct Critical Decision Method (CDM) interviews to elicit expert reasoning strategies (L3 knowledge) from practitioners about specific challenging past incidents. Use when capturing expertise for skill development, preserving knowledge before practitioner departure, building post-incident learning artifacts, or investigating decisions in complex sociotechnical systems. Outputs structured incident reconstructions with cues, decisions, alternatives considered, and counterfactual analysis suitable for distillation into skills or training material.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Identify and counteract cognitive biases in medical decision-making through systematic error analysis and contextual algorithm application. For diagnostic reasoning, treatment decisions, and clinical judgment improvement. NOT for basic medical knowledge, technical procedures, or non-clinical healthcare domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Design and build mathematically rigorous, high-density, interactive data graphics and streaming telemetry visualizations following Mike Bostock's D3.js and Observable methodologies. Use when crafting custom SVG/Canvas charts, reactive streaming time-series, multi-dimensional brush-and-link coordinates, small multiples, or topological swarm graphs. NOT for generic dashboard template clones, basic spreadsheet charts, or off-the-shelf low-effort wrapper libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Add automatic CI/CD environment detection using ci-info package. Generic pattern for any CLI tool that needs to adapt behavior (prompts, output, integrations) based on whether it's running in CI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
krafteq/infraglue☆ 22026年7月8日 更新
Searches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maros112358/scepticagent☆ 22026年3月22日 更新
Undo a haircut trim. Puts back the skills, commands, subagents, MCP servers, hooks, plugins and files that haircut parked into a dated bag, using the receipt it wrote at the time. Use this skill whenever the user says undo the cleanup, undo the haircut, put my config back, restore what was trimmed, I need that MCP server again, that skill is gone and I want it back, roll the trim back, what is in the bag, or which files were moved. Use it also when something stopped working right after a config cleanup and they suspect the cleanup caused it, and whenever they ask how to reverse a config cleanup they regret.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OthmanAdi/haircut☆ 22026年9月14日 更新
Add a macOS menu bar status indicator for NanoClaw. Shows a bolt icon with a green/red dot indicating whether NanoClaw is running, with Start, Stop, and Restart controls. macOS only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail☆ 22026年4月3日 更新