「x」の検索結果

Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive completed milestone and prepare for next version

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retroactively audit an executed AI phase's evaluation coverage — scores each eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING and produces an actionable EVAL-REVIEW.md with remediation plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route freeform text to the right GSD command automatically

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (the agent picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create context handoff when pausing work mid-phase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with persistent state across context resets

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add an idea to the backlog parking lot (999.x numbering)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a trivial task inline — no subagents, no planning overhead

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize a new project with deep context gathering and PROJECT.md

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insert urgent work as decimal phase (e.g., 72.1) between existing phases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities where regular users can invoke administrative functions or access privileged API endpoints by directly calling them. The tester identifies admin and privileged endpoints, then attempts to access them with regular user credentials by manipulating HTTP methods, URL paths, and request parameters. Maps to OWASP API5:2023 Broken Function Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving BFLA testing, admin endpoint bypass, function-level access control testing, or API privilege escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect abuse of elevation control mechanisms including UAC bypass, sudo exploitation, and setuid/setgid manipulation by monitoring registry modifications, process elevation flags, and unusual parent-child process relationships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform Kerberoasting attacks using Impacket's GetUserSPNs to extract and crack Kerberos TGS tickets for Active Directory service accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing WebSocket implementations for authentication bypass, cross-site hijacking, injection attacks, and insecure message handling during authorized security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes and simulates BGP hijacking scenarios in authorized lab environments to assess route origin validation, RPKI deployment, and BGP monitoring defenses against prefix hijacking and route leak attacks on internet routing infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection testing, SQLi in APIs, NoSQL injection, SSRF testing, or API input validation assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects typosquatting attacks in npm and PyPI package registries by analyzing package name similarity using Levenshtein distance and other string metrics, examining publish date heuristics to identify recently created packages mimicking established ones, and flagging download count anomalies where suspicious packages have disproportionately low usage compared to their legitimate targets. The analyst queries the PyPI JSON API and npm registry API to gather package metadata for automated comparison. Activates for requests involving package typosquatting detection, dependency confusion analysis, malicious package identification, or software supply chain threat hunting in package registries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect LSASS credential dumping, SAM database extraction, and NTDS.dit theft using Sysmon Event ID 10, Windows Security logs, and SIEM correlation rules

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes fileless malware that operates entirely in memory using PowerShell, WMI, .NET reflection, registry-resident payloads, and living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins) without writing traditional executable files to disk. Activates for requests involving fileless threat detection, in-memory malware investigation, LOLBin abuse analysis, or WMI persistence examination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。