「sse」の検索結果

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and address review feedback on GitHub PRs, GitLab MRs, or in conversation. Use when checking new reviews, responding to comments, rechecking after a push, or following up on approvals and change requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python code across type safety, error handling, security, performance, modern patterns, design clarity, typed-boundary compliance, test quality, and documentation. Use when performing code review, PR review, pre-merge quality checks, or assessing Python for security vulnerabilities, bare except clauses, Any usage outside boundaries, or missing input validation at system boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles TOML configuration file operations in Python using tomlkit for comment-preserving read-modify-write cycles. Use when reading or writing pyproject.toml or any .toml config file, selecting between tomlkit and tomllib, modifying TOML while preserving comments and whitespace, implementing atomic config file updates, integrating TOML with Python dataclasses, handling TOML parse errors, or applying XDG base directory patterns for config file locations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently assessing how bounded Python code could accomplish the same behavior with less maintained code, more Pythonic design, newer language/stdlib capabilities, or well-maintained ecosystem libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-selects and enforces the strongest valid Python typing lane for the detected Python version and dependencies — no user input required. Use when adding or tightening type annotations, eliminating Any usage in internal code, designing boundary validators or parsers, choosing between stdlib typing (TypedDict, Protocol, dataclasses), Pydantic models, or Hypothesis property tests, addressing ty or mypy failures, or applying version-specific features (TypeIs, ReadOnly, PEP 695 generics, PEP 649 deferred evaluation). Enforces boundary isolation — raw payloads validated immediately at ingress and returned as typed internal objects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan Claude Code session transcripts to find the strongest user reactions to assistant instruction-following failures, reconstruct the triggering assistant output, and render a shareable terminal-style PNG artifact. Use when you want to surface and share a moment where the assistant completely missed what was asked — captures what they were doing, what Claude said, and how the user reacted. Triggers on: "rtfp", "read the fucking prompt", "find my worst AI moment", "make a rage screenshot from this session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an assessor task file and every generated follow-up in dependency order. Use when a refactoring task file already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a single skill's quality against its stated purpose. Classifies the skill's purpose type, then scores applicable quality categories — universal dimensions always apply; structural dimensions (scripts, references, assets) are scored only when warranted by the skill's purpose. A focused 20-line behavioral skill with no bundled resources scores fully on all applicable categories. Use when auditing skill quality, checking marketplace readiness, evaluating skill completeness, performing pre-publication evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the full plugin development lifecycle from blank canvas to marketplace-ready. Use when creating a new plugin, improving an existing plugin, fixing validation errors, or taking a plugin through assessment, research, design, creation, debugging, optimization, and verification. Complements /plugin-creator:plugin-creator which provides the detailed new-plugin creation workflow with discussion capture, parallel research, and atomic implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add automated documentation updater to any Claude skill. Creates a Python sync script that downloads upstream docs, processes markdown for AI consumption, and maintains local cache with configurable refresh. Collects template variables, then delegates implementation through 5-phase workflow. Use when adding auto-updating reference documentation to plugins or skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for skill goal recovery and authority assessment. Delegate to Skill Lapidary's establish-validatable-goals capability rather than maintaining a second goal-contract system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a complete plugin refactoring workflow that analyzes plugin structure, creates a refactoring plan with tasks, and guides through execution. Use when you need to refactor an entire plugin — triggers assessment, design, planning, and parallel agent execution phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate a completed plugin refactor against its task evidence, baseline assessment, documentation, and current validators. Use after implement-refactor or when deciding whether refactoring is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator context window discipline enforcement. Prevents the orchestrator from reading source files it will not edit, running diagnostic commands that waste context, and rationalizing delegation bypasses. Use when setting up orchestrator guardrails, reviewing delegation discipline, or diagnosing context window waste in multi-agent workflows. Activates PreToolUse hooks that surface decision points before source file reads and diagnostic command execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify one falsifiable factual claim against evidence appropriate to the claim. Use when a concrete assertion about software, documentation, configuration, releases, or repository behavior must be classified as VERIFIED, REFUTED, or INCONCLUSIVE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant fault detection, refactor tolerance, boundary fidelity, isolation, and diagnostic value. Use when auditing test quality, reviewing coverage gaps, improving regression protection, or assessing tests after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Node.js runtime behavior in JavaScript or TypeScript, including server entrypoints, route handlers, middleware, streams, processes, dependencies, and environment configuration. Loads alongside language and CLI checks when applicable; investigates blocking I/O, backpressure, injection, lifecycle leaks, and misleading failure signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze the causal system-wide impact of a proposed change across behavior, interfaces, state/data, runtime dependencies, tests, documentation, controls, people/processes, and model/prompt/context behavior. Use before planning when lexical reference search is insufficient to establish blast radius and verification obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify multiple factual claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content. Extracts discrete claims, delegates each to the canonical factual-verification process, and aggregates VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE results. Use for "fact check", "verify claims", or a set of unverified factual assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a user from one rough content idea to a finished post, platform-adapted variants, and repurposed follow-on assets using a 7-step sequential prompting workflow. Use when the user wants to turn a half-formed idea, frustration, story, or client situation into publishable content quickly and consistently — covering idea extraction, hook generation, outline, draft, humanizer pass, platform adaptation (LinkedIn, Reddit, X/Twitter, newsletter, Telegram), and repurpose engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。