9,285 件 ・ 関連度順
Design deliberately flawed examples that develop error-detection skills and deepen understanding. Use when students make characteristic errors and need practice spotting mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a structured outdoor learning sequence embedding curriculum objectives in an available outdoor space. Use when planning lessons in school grounds, parks, or local natural environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a direct experience into a full learning cycle with concrete experience, reflection, and conceptual transfer. Use when planning field trips, simulations, or practical tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a service-learning project connecting genuine community need with embedded curriculum learning. Use when planning community projects, civic engagement, or social action units.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify curriculum content into Know, Understand, and Do categories to align teaching and assessment approaches. Use when planning units, writing objectives, or selecting assessment methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create an interactive digital worked example sequence with fading for online or blended delivery. Use when building e-learning modules, LMS content, or app-based instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redesign a learning space using biophilic design principles to improve focus, calm, and wellbeing. Use when classroom environment contributes to restlessness, poor attention, or stress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expertise complète pour produire une fiche d'arrêt ou un commentaire de décision en droit administratif français (méthode Faouzi El Ouertani, 7 rubriques + plan binaire critique). Vérification systématique des décisions et textes cités via le MCP LibreJustice (https://librejustice.fr/mcp/) et les connecteurs Légifrance. Déclenché par « fiche d'arrêt », « commentaire d'arrêt », « commentaire de décision », « analyse de décision » en droit administratif.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert Section 508 compliance advisor for US federal ICT accessibility. Use this skill whenever a user asks about Section 508, WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA for federal systems, VPAT or Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR), accessibility audits, remediation planning, PDF accessibility, web or software accessibility, mobile accessibility, federal procurement accessibility requirements, contractor obligations, undue burden exceptions, assistive technology compatibility, or Section 508 testing. Covers the Revised Section 508 Standards (2018), all WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria, the four POUR principles, testing methodologies, and agency compliance workflows. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any Section 508 or ICT accessibility question for federal systems should use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Génération de sujets d'entraînement complets pour l'épreuve de NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE (5 heures, coefficient 3) de l'examen d'accès au CRFPA : choix du sujet, dossier documentaire de 16 à 20 documents assemblé à partir de sources réelles vérifiées (textes, jurisprudence, travaux parlementaires, doctrine) avec contrôle du verbatim, puis grille de notation au modèle de la Commission nationale (résumé de chaque document, problématique, thèmes cotés sur 20, plan). Livraison en deux fichiers .docx distincts, le sujet et la grille. Si l'utilisateur n'impose pas de sujet, en chercher un dans l'actualité juridique. Mode aveugle pour l'étudiant qui compose sans rien voir du corrigé. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur demande un sujet de note de synthèse, un dossier documentaire, une note de synthèse blanche, un entraînement à l'épreuve de 5 heures du CRFPA ou de l'IEJ, ou une grille de note de synthèse. NE PAS déclencher pour les épreuves de 3 heures (sujet-crfpa-toutes-matieres) ni pour la correction de copies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 100-1 + the NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile) to a specific AI system, governance question, or impact assessment. Three modes — consult, governance plan, full assessment — all cite Subcategories (`GOVERN 1.1`) and Profile Action IDs (`GV-1.2-001`) verbatim. Use when the user mentions the AI RMF, NIST RMF, NIST AI 100-1, NIST AI 600-1, GenAI Profile, the four functions (Govern / Map / Measure / Manage), the trustworthy AI characteristics, the 12 GAI risks (confabulation, harmful bias, information integrity, CBRN, data privacy, etc.), or asks "what does NIST say about X" for an AI system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ITAR or US defense export control question should use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Index analytiques sourcés du corpus réglementaire et doctrinal sur la gouvernance des émetteurs cotés français (rapports AMF et HCGE 2020-2025, guide d'application HCGE, rapport sénatorial Rietmann/Gay, Code AFEP-MEDEF, sources légales et européennes). À utiliser pour : (1) retrouver une position, une statistique ou une citation exacte avec sa source et sa page ; (2) analyser l'évolution longitudinale des positions AMF/HCGE/ESMA sur un thème ; (3) appliquer la grille d'analyse en 13 blocs (A-M) à un émetteur. Déclencher pour toute question sur la gouvernance d'une société cotée française : conseil d'administration, indépendance des administrateurs, comités, rémunération des dirigeants, say on pay, say on climate, assemblée générale, droits des actionnaires, plans de succession, mixité, RSE/CSRD, comply-or-explain, name and shame AMF, soft law AFEP-MEDEF, recommandations AMF, positions HCGE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or uploads an OFAC or OFSI enforcement action and asks for any of the following: root cause analysis, compliance gaps, what went wrong, lessons learned, organizational self-assessment, or remediation planning. Also trigger when a user asks "analyze this enforcement action", "what were the root causes", "turn this into a checklist", or "how do I make sure this doesn't happen to us". Outputs a single-sheet .xlsx table with six columns: Root Cause | What Went Wrong | How It Went Wrong | What Could Have Stopped It | Is my organization immune to this? (Yes/No/Partial) | Notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess obligations under Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 for connected products, related services, statutory B2B data sharing, unfair data-contract terms, exceptional-need B2G requests, data-processing-service switching, international governmental access, interoperability, smart contracts, enforcement, and non-EU representatives. Use for Data Act scope analysis, gap assessments, product and service design, request handling, contract review, cloud exit planning, or cross-regulation mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. Warning-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orientação completa sobre conformidade com regulamentações do Banco Central do Brasil: Resolução CMN nº 4.893/2021 (Política de Segurança Cibernética), Resolução BCB nº 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brasil (Resoluções BCB nº 32/2020 e atualizações), e demais normas prudenciais do BACEN. Cobre elaboração e revisão de Política de Segurança Cibernética, Plano de Ação e Resposta a Incidentes (PARI), Gestão de Riscos de Serviços de Informação e Comunicação (GRSIC), consentimento e compartilhamento de dados no Open Finance, requisitos de API, gestão de terceiros (outsourcing) e sanções do BACEN. Triggers: Bacen, Banco Central, CMN 4.893, Resolução 4.893, segurança cibernética bancária, PARI, GRSIC, Open Finance, Open Banking, compartilhamento de dados financeiros, consentimento Open Finance, API financeira, outsourcing bancário, risco cibernético, incidente cibernético banco, LGPD financeira, fintech compliance, instituição financeira, DICT, Pix segurança.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。