「argument」の検索結果

Generate CLI command with argument parsing, handler, help text, and tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured bail hearing summaries from transcripts and case documents, extracting charges, arguments, conditions, and rulings. Use when summarizing bail hearings, pretrial detention decisions, bond hearings, or release condition orders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当AI智能体完成一段法律推理或论证后，需要对该推理结论进行自我评估，判断论证的整体强度与置信度，识别并标注推理链条中的薄弱环节。 触发条件包括但不限于： - 完成法律分析后需要给出结论可靠性评级 - 用户明确要求评估某一论证的说服力或可靠性 - 存在多个竞争性法律解释需要比较论证强度 - 推理过程中涉及不确定因素（事实不明、法律空白、争议观点）需要标注 - 为决策者提供风险提示，说明结论的局限性 - 对己方或对方的法律论证进行攻防强度评估 - 在法律意见书、备忘录等文书中需要附加置信度说明

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured 500-800 word summaries of legal articles distilling thesis, methodology, arguments, authorities, conclusions, and significance. Triggers when summarizing legal scholarship, reviewing law review articles, preparing literature reviews, or triaging articles for full reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当AI智能体需要将法律推理结果组织为完整、自洽、有说服力的论证结构时触发此技能。 典型触发场景包括但不限于： - 撰写法律意见书、代理词、辩护词、答辩状等法律文书中的论证部分 - 回答用户提出的复杂法律问题，需要多步骤推理并呈现结论 - 对争议焦点进行系统性分析，需要构建从事实到法律到结论的完整推理路径 - 反驳对方观点时，需要构建替代性论证链条 - 对多个法律问题进行综合分析，需要确保各论证之间逻辑一致、互不矛盾 - 在法律研究备忘录中呈现分析结论 触发信号关键词：论证、分析、推理、为什么、证明、理由、论述、阐述观点、法律分析

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured analytical summaries of appellate documents covering procedural posture, issues on appeal, standards of review, and strategic assessment. Use when onboarding to an appeal, preparing for oral argument, evaluating appellate risk, or summarizing the appellate record.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track data flow between function parameters, calls, and arguments using taint analysis. Use when detecting vulnerabilities like command injection, buffer overflows, or tracing user input to dangerous functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit; bias to build over deliberate. Use when the user says 'andreessen', 'pmarca mode', 'should I build this', 'is there a market', 'are we at product/market fit', 'pmf check', 'pressure-test this idea', 'be brutal about this venture', 'market-first take', or wants a no-disclaimers, no-hedging, confidence-leveled verdict on whether something is worth pursuing. Also provides the 3x5-card + Anti-Todo personal productivity routine. Runs on a fixed anti-sycophancy operating prompt: leads with the strongest counterargument, never validates premises, uses explicit confidence levels, never apologizes for disagreeing. Not for polite brainstorming — this skill exists to tell you the market is dead when it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get advice on app improvements and functionality from a Wasp expert. Takes optional arguments for more specific requests e.g. `/expert-advice how can I improve account management?`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating and managing slash commands in Claude Code. Use when (1) creating new slash commands, (2) learning command syntax and features, (3) deciding between commands vs skills, (4) implementing advanced command features (arguments, hooks, bash execution), or (5) organizing and managing command libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mint a new YYYY-MM-DD-exact-coding-baseline snapshot under research/workflow-dev/export/. Detects the current best correctness- oriented workflow from research/workflow-dev/workflow-construction.md (or takes an explicit source-workflow argument) and transforms it from a lab workflow into a consumer-ready one on three axes: strips lab-only measurement content, re-enables human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and converts auto-loading config into an explicitly-invoked skill. Supports both promoted EXACT Coding lines: Opus/Hybrid and SOL/Predictive TDD. Exports Claude Code, pi, OpenCode, cursor-agent and, for SOL, Copilot. Trigger when the user says "exact-coding baseline export", "neue exact-coding baseline", "exact-coding-baseline-export", or asks to refresh the baseline snapshot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Escreva papers prontos para publicação em NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use quando estiver elaborando papers a partir de repositórios de pesquisa, estruturando argumentos, verificando citações ou preparando submissões finais. Inclui templates LaTeX, diretrizes de revisores e workflows de verificação de citações.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an aggregated Epic PR from a `cc-epic-<Issue number>` branch to the default branch. Takes the Epic Issue number as argument, assumes sub-PRs have already been merged into the epic branch, and automatically generates the PR title and description from the commit log against the base branch (including sub-PR / sub-Issue references). The PR is posted via `gh pr create` with no label and `Closes #<Epic Issue>`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan and a GitHub Issue based on the task description provided as an argument. Use this when the user supplies a natural-language task description (not an issue number) and wants a new implementation-ready Issue. If the input is an existing issue number, use create-issue-from-issue-number (re-analyze) or update-issue (reflect comments) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a single-thesis narrative newsletter essay from Ahmad's OpenMark saves. Use when Ahmad wants a thoughtful long-form piece with one clear argument, not a roundup or news recap. Trigger phrases include "essay", "long-form", "think piece", "thoughtful post", "argue that", "make a case for", "/newsletter-essay". Output is one strong thesis sentence + 3–5 narrative sections + closing call-to-think, no tables, no bullets unless necessary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect abuse of legitimate Windows binaries (LOLBins) used for living off the land attacks. Monitors process creation, command-line arguments, and parent-child relationships to identify suspicious LOLBin execution patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect malicious scheduled task creation and modification using Sysmon Event IDs 1 (Process Create for schtasks.exe), 11 (File Create for task XML), and Windows Security Event 4698/4702. The analyst correlates task creation with suspicious parent processes, public directory paths, and encoded command arguments to identify persistence and lateral movement via scheduled tasks. Activates for requests involving scheduled task detection, Sysmon persistence hunting, or T1053.005 Scheduled Task/Job analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert LaTeX papers between journal/conference templates for journal resubmission or template switching (e.g., Springer → MDPI, IEEE → Nature, IPOL → CVPR) through a privacy-preserving anonymized workflow. Use when the user provides a LaTeX .tex/project plus a target template directory or .tex file. Assume the input is not anonymized unless the user explicitly says it is already anonymized. Preserve privacy sentinels exactly; never open mapping.private.json except as a local script argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, compile, load, debug and re-use SuperCollider SynthDefs with sc_synthdef - the unit of sound design in SuperCollider. Covers Out and ReplaceOut, argument naming, envelopes and doneAction, why a def must be loaded on a specific server before /s_new works, and how to read the compiler's error rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The SuperCollider language itself - function blocks and argument syntax, UGen rate methods (.ar/.kr/.ir), multi-channel expansion, var scoping, ~environment variables, the class library's shape, and the error messages that mean a specific mistake. Written for an agent that knows audio DSP but not this language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。