1,088 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized Active Directory red-team security testing, including Kerberos attacks, domain privilege escalation, lateral movement, and GPO abuse. Use when a task belongs to the AD testing domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recon intake skill for first contact with a bare domain, URL, or IP address. Use to build an initial recon_profile and provide factual inputs for CVE lookup and attack-path routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides AI and machine learning techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking ML models, crafting adversarial examples, performing model extraction, prompt injection, membership inference, training data poisoning, fine-tuning manipulation, neural network analysis, LoRA adapter exploitation, LLM jailbreaking, or solving AI-related puzzles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Technical proposal facing adversarial scrutiny: independent perspectives attack a proposal, then distill into a bundle a separate planner consumes. Use when the user says: adversarial-consensus, adversarial planning, adversarial plan review, red team this plan, red-team this plan, red team the proposal, multi-perspective review, multiple perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an AWS Security Agent penetration test against a live web application — registers and verifies the target domain, exercises the supplied endpoints with the managed Security Agent service, and returns verified runtime findings. Use when the user asks to pentest, run a penetration test, test their app's attack surface, find runtime vulnerabilities, register or verify a target domain, or check pentest status / findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a target's CORS posture — Access-Control-Allow-Origin handling, reflected-origin bypass, credentials+wildcard mismatch, preflight OPTIONS behavior, Vary header correctness. Use when: a third-party integration is failing CORS preflight and someone proposes "just set Allow-Origin to *" as the fix, OR your bug-bounty inbox has a credential-reuse exploit chain. Threshold: any reflection of arbitrary Origin into Allow-Origin, Allow-Credentials:true with wildcard origin (browser-rejected combo but server config wrong), missing Vary:Origin on per-origin responses, preflight cached over 86400s, OR Allow-Origin trust of attacker- controlled subdomain pattern. Trigger with: "audit cors", "check cors policy", "cors bypass", "preflight check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organization-grade identity-fabric mapping: tenant/federation fingerprinting and the pre-auth user-ENUMERATION oracle methodology — enumeration and fingerprint only, never credential submission. Covers domain-to-tenant resolution (Microsoft getuserrealm.srf Managed/Federated namespace check, Entra OIDC metadata tenant-GUID extraction, Autodiscover v2), keyless Microsoft tenant-federation mapping (GetFederationInformation SOAP -> sibling-domain discovery, discover-only ROE, FEDERATED_WITH provenance edge held out of attack-path pivoting), Okta org-slug derivation + OIDC fingerprint + governed custom-domain enumeration, ADFS passive/active fingerprint + version inference, Google Workspace MX-correlated detection, generic OIDC (Auth0/Keycloak/Ping Identity/OneLogin/Duo) discovery, SAML metadata (5 paths), Azure AD Seamless-SSO Negotiate-challenge detection, Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) sensor-API presence check, the user-enumeration oracle methodology for Microsoft GetCredentialType (IfExistsResult semantics: exists / doesn't-exist / exists-in-federated-tenant / throttled) and Okta /api/v1/authn (errorCode differential), Medium-detectability discipline with a hard 20-candidate-per-tenant cap and admin/role interest-based ranking, and name x confirmed-email-pattern login-candidate synthesis that FAILS CLOSED with zero output when no org pattern is confirmed. Grounded directly in a production ASM implementation's sso_idp.py, tenant_recon.py, and core/email_patterns.py modules. Deepens — does not duplicate — offensive-osint skill's Identity Fabric endpoint reference with the tenant-federation MAP, the oracle WORKFLOW, and the candidate-SYNTHESIS methodology that reference lacks. Use when fingerprinting an organization's identity provider, mapping its tenant/federation boundary, running an authorized pre-auth user-enumeration pass, or synthesizing login candidates from harvested names to feed that oracle — never for password spray, credential submission, or auth bypass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JNDI injection playbook. Use when Java applications perform JNDI lookups with attacker-controlled names, especially via Log4j2, Spring, or any code path reaching InitialContext.lookup().
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Race condition and TOCTOU testing for web apps. Use when testing one-time operations, concurrent HTTP abuse, rate-limit bypass, Turbo Intruder gates, HTTP/2 single-packet attacks, and CWE-362-style synchronization gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Smart contract vulnerability playbook. Use when auditing Solidity/EVM contracts for reentrancy, integer overflow, access control, delegatecall, flash loan, signature replay, and MEV-related attack patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSTI playbook. Use when template expressions, server-side rendering, preview features, or templating engines may evaluate attacker-controlled content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for reconnaissance and methodology. Use when mapping scope, drawing an attack surface from one application, discovering assets, fingerprinting technology, building endpoint inventory, and choosing the first high-value security testing path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open redirect playbook. Use when URL parameters, form actions, or JavaScript sinks control navigation targets and may redirect users to attacker-controlled destinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subdomain takeover detection and exploitation playbook. Use when targets have dangling CNAME/NS/MX records pointing to deprovisioned cloud resources, expired third-party services, or unclaimed SaaS tenants that an attacker can register to serve content under the victim's domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for business logic testing. Use when workflow abuse, race conditions, pricing flaws, or multi-step state attacks matter more than parser-level input injection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HTTP Host header injection and routing abuse playbook. Use when the application trusts the Host header for generating URLs, routing requests, or access control — enabling password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF via routing, and virtual host bypass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Active Directory ACL abuse playbook. Use when exploiting misconfigured AD permissions including GenericAll, WriteDACL, DCSync rights, shadow credentials, LAPS reading, GPO abuse, and BloodHound-guided attack paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for injection testing. Use when routing between XSS, SQLi, SSRF, XXE, SSTI, command injection, and NoSQL injection workflows based on how attacker-controlled input is consumed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Heap exploitation playbook. Use when targeting ptmalloc2/glibc heap vulnerabilities including UAF, double free, overflow, off-by-one/null, and leveraging tcache/fastbin/unsortedbin attacks for arbitrary write or code execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clickjacking playbook. Use when testing whether target pages can be framed, whether X-Frame-Options or CSP frame-ancestors are properly configured, and whether UI redress attacks can trigger sensitive actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expression Language injection playbook. Use when Java EL, SpEL, OGNL, or MVEL expressions may evaluate attacker-controlled input in Spring, Struts2, Confluence, or similar frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。