本文へ移動
cccskills

「best」の検索結果

2,379 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BuilderIO/skills4,5752026年10月9日 更新

Analyzes performance by day of week and hour of day across your campaigns. Identifies when your ads perform best and worst, recommends ad schedule adjustments with estimated savings, and tells you exactly what you'd give up by restricting hours. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4902026年10月13日 更新

Given your total budget, recommends the optimal split across Google Search, PMax, Meta prospecting, Meta retargeting, and any other active channels based on your last 60-90 days of marginal ROAS and CPA by channel. Tells you where each additional dollar produces the best return. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4902026年10月13日 更新

Reviews all your Google Ads extensions — sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets, call extensions, image extensions, price extensions — across every campaign. Flags what's missing, what's underperforming, what's outdated, and writes replacements based on your best performing ads and landing pages. Platform: Google.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4902026年10月13日 更新

Generate consistent UTM parameters, GA4 event naming, and conversion tracking specs following taxonomy best practices. Use when describing campaign structure, requesting UTM links, needing GA4 event names, or wanting to standardize tracking nomenclature across marketing channels. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4902026年10月13日 更新

Create a new skill (MCP tool) for the Unity Editor by writing a C# (.cs) file that Unity compiles into the project. After compilation the new tool becomes callable through MCP. The file must be a partial class decorated with [AiToolType], each tool method must be decorated with [AiTool], the class name should match the file name, all Unity API calls must run via com.IvanMurzak.ReflectorNet.Utils.MainThread.Instance.Run(), and the method should either return a structured data model (for parseable output) or void (for side-effect-only operations). See the body of this skill for a full sample and best-practice notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IvanMurzak/Unity-MCP4,4492026年10月13日 更新

Use this skill when writing code that calls the Gemini API for text generation, multi-turn chat, multimodal understanding, image generation, video generation, speech generation (TTS), voice design, voice replication, streaming responses, background research tasks, function calling, structured output, or migrating from the old generateContent API. Covers SDK usage and best practices for Gemini models and agents in Python and TypeScript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

google-gemini/gemini-skills4,2762026年10月14日 更新

Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2292026年10月14日 更新

Track and synthesize current AI hotspots into a bilingual HTML daily report. Use when the user says "AI热点", asks for AI日报/AI日报 HTML/AI hot topics, or wants the best recent AI products, papers, viewpoints, and cognition-shifting items from AI/news aggregators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huangruiteng/CS-Notes4,0052026年10月14日 更新

Extract a Markdown heading tree with line numbers before editing or integrating notes. Use when you need to inspect a long Markdown file quickly and choose the best insertion point instead of editing blind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

huangruiteng/CS-Notes4,0052026年10月14日 更新

React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CherryHQ/cherry-studio-app3,9982026年10月14日 更新

Provides React Native performance optimization guidelines for FPS, TTI, bundle size, memory leaks, re-renders, and animations. Applies to tasks involving Hermes optimization, JS thread blocking, bridge overhead, FlashList, native modules, or debugging jank and frame drops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CherryHQ/cherry-studio-app3,9982026年10月14日 更新

Build, audit, and fix @legendapp/list and LegendList usage in React, React Native, and web apps. Use for virtualization, scroll blanking, mount cost, data identity, recycling, row invalidation, measurement, chat anchoring, drawDistance, visibility, or Legend List performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CherryHQ/cherry-studio-app3,9982026年10月14日 更新

Best practices and example-driven guidance for building SwiftUI views and components, including navigation hierarchies, custom view modifiers, and responsive layouts with stacks and grids. Use when creating or refactoring SwiftUI UI, designing tab architecture with TabView, composing screens with VStack/HStack, managing @State or @Binding, building declarative iOS interfaces, or needing component-specific patterns and examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dimillian/Skills3,9972026年3月30日 更新

Creative research ideation and exploration. Use for open-ended brainstorming sessions, exploring interdisciplinary connections, challenging assumptions, or identifying research gaps. Best for early-stage research planning when you do not have specific observations yet. For formulating testable hypotheses from data use hypothesis-generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9592026年10月13日 更新

Design experiments and studies BEFORE data is collected — choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so the results will actually be interpretable. Use whenever someone is planning a study, asks how to assign subjects/samples to groups, mentions randomization, blocking, stratification, controls, factorial or fractional-factorial designs, design of experiments (DOE), screening many factors, response-surface optimization, crossover or repeated-measures or split-plot designs, cluster/group randomization, Latin squares, plate layouts, batch/run-order effects, replication vs. pseudoreplication, or sequential/adaptive/group-sequential designs. Trigger this even for informal phrasings like "how should I set up this experiment", "how do I avoid confounding", "what's the best way to test these 6 factors", or "assign these mice to conditions". For computing the sample size or power once the design is chosen, use statistical-power; for analyzing data already collected, use statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9592026年10月13日 更新

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9592026年10月13日 更新

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

spacering-net/codeg3,9592026年10月13日 更新

Validation agent that validates plan tech choices against current best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9442026年1月27日 更新

Research agent for external documentation, best practices, and library APIs via MCP tools

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9442026年1月27日 更新

gemini

無料

Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nowork-studio/notfair-plugin3,9362026年10月14日 更新

ulw-plan

無料

ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

code-yeongyu/lazycodex3,7712026年10月14日 更新

Turn a website's observable HTTP traffic into a best-effort OpenAPI 3.1 spec by analyzing a `browser-trace` capture. Use when the user wants to discover/extract API endpoints from a browser session, build an OpenAPI doc from network traffic, or document a third-party site's XHR/fetch surface for client integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

browserbase/skills3,7312026年9月30日 更新

Entry point for new work. Determines the best action path or work decomposition (update existing spec, create new spec, mixed decomposition, or no spec needed) and refines ideas through structured dialogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gotalab/cc-sdd3,7132026年10月13日 更新