809 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build, revise, audit, or rebut a research manuscript from Harness Research evidence. Use for paper intake, related-work research, claim and citation control, section architecture, LaTeX patching, figure planning, reviewer response, or final manuscript hardening when the workspace contains Harness research artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user wants to obtain, download, or fetch a paper's PDF — given a DOI, an arXiv id, a paper title, a citation, or a list of DOIs. Trigger on phrases like "download this paper", "find the PDF for [DOI]", "grab me the [Nature/bioRxiv/arXiv] paper on X", "get the open-access version", "I need this article", or any bulk/batch paper download request, even when the user doesn't explicitly say "PDF" or "DOI". Resolves via Unpaywall → Semantic Scholar → arXiv → PubMed Central → bioRxiv/medRxiv → publisher direct (institutional opt-in) → Sci-Hub mirrors as last-resort fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the Semantic Scholar academic corpus through AI2's Asta MCP server: keyword or title search with venue and date filters, who-cited-a-paper traversal, author profiles and publications, DOI/arXiv/PMID lookup, and ~500-word full-text snippets for evidence, with citation counts and h-index. Use when the user asks for papers on a topic, who cited a paper, an author's work, recent literature since a date, or a venue-scoped paper list. Requires the Asta MCP server.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Developing with Zotero: Web API v3 (read/write, file upload, sync, OAuth, item types/fields), the desktop client's JS API, plugin development (7-10), translators (web/import/export/search), and CSL/citeproc-js styles. Use when scripting Zotero or building or debugging a plugin, translator, or citation style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when looking up journal or magazine name abbreviations, converting between full names and ISO 4/MEDLINE abbreviations, processing BibTeX files for journal name standardization, or answering questions about 期刊缩写/杂志缩写. Triggers on "journal abbreviation", "abbreviate journal", "journal name", "期刊缩写", "杂志缩写", "ISO 4", "LTWA", "BibTeX journal". PROACTIVELY USE when user mentions citation formatting, reference list preparation, or manuscript submission to specific journals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants full metadata for a paper — from a DOI, PMID, arXiv id, OpenAlex id, or title. Returns title, author list, first author, corresponding author(s), publication date, journal name + ISO-4 abbreviation, impact factor, volume/issue/pages, DOI/PMID, citation count, and abstract in one record. Triggers on "paper metadata", "who is the corresponding author", "first author of", "what journal / impact factor for this DOI/PMID", "cite this paper", "文献元数据", "通讯作者", "第一作者", "影响因子". PROACTIVELY USE when the user pastes a DOI/PMID/arXiv id or paper title and asks about its authors, venue, or impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic backlink building for indie founders. Covers 5 channel types ranked by GEO + SEO ROI: Wikipedia (entities), authoritative media (PR), industry reviews (G2/Capterra/Product Hunt), Reddit/Quora discussions, and HARO/Featured.com expert quotes. Designed for 0→1 sites where domain authority is the bottleneck. Aligns with 2026 Google/Bing GEO guidance: backlinks are the strongest brand-authority signal AI search engines use to decide citations. Defaults to dev/B2B link sources; for 2C products (education, consumer apps) authority links differ — see gingiris-seo-geo/references/2c-adaptation.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPS-aligned genealogical research assistant for family history, ancestor research, record analysis, source-information-evidence classification, conflict resolution, citations, FAN research, privacy-sensitive document analysis, and proof statements, summaries, or arguments. Use for census, vital, probate, land, military, church, newspaper, DNA-plus-documentary, and other genealogy evidence tasks. Not for GEDCOM creation (use gedcom-creator), general history questions, DNA-kit shopping, or generic writing tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sichtbarkeit, Zitierung und Empfehlung in KI-Antwortsystemen für Deutschland und den DACH-Raum evidenzbasiert prüfen und verbessern. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn eine Marke oder Seite in KI-Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini oder Copilot auftauchen soll, wenn Crawler-Freigaben für KI-Bots, llms.txt, strukturierte Daten oder die Extrahierbarkeit von Inhalten zu bewerten sind, oder wenn jemand nach AEO, GEO oder LLMO fragt. Trennt Abruf, Zitierung, Erwähnung und Empfehlung, prüft Behauptungen über KI-Rankingfaktoren gegen Primärquellen und verspricht keine Sichtbarkeit. Für klassisches technisches SEO ist seo-audit zuständig.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct rigorous, citation-backed desk market research: quick go/no-go market scans, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), competitor analysis, customer demand signals, and trend/macro (PESTEL) analysis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research, size, validate, or enter a market — "is there a market for…", "how big is the market for…", "who are the competitors of…", "should I build/launch/sell…", "validate this business idea", "market research for…", "market entry" — in any language and for any country's market (e.g. "nghiên cứu thị trường", "étude de marché", "市場調査", "análisis de mercado"), even when the user never says the words "market research". Also use it when another skill or workflow (strategy-board, design-thinking, a product brief) needs external market facts delivered into its fact base or research folder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adaptive conversion of LaTeX, PDF, or Markdown sources into a complete Word .docx that follows a user-supplied .docx template. Use when pandoc --reference-doc alone is not enough — for thesis, dissertation, report, or institutional Word formatting that needs cover pages, declarations, TOC, heading numbering, captions, three-line tables, equations, citations, and visual verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of U.S. insurance policies, endorsements, claims files, and coverage correspondence for coverage analysis and insurance litigation. Use when summarizing policies, declarations, claims files, reservation-of-rights letters, denial letters, or coverage disputes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes insurance scenarios by referencing specific sections of the Life Insurance Act, Insurance Contracts Act, and Corporations Act, providing direct quotes and explanations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for autonomous deep research, iterative web search, citation verification, evidence graph synthesis, and hallucination mitigation / Panduan ahli riset mendalam otonom, pencarian web iteratif, verifikasi sitasi, dan mitigasi halusinasi.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Searches and discovers academic papers across multiple sources (Semantic Scholar, arXiv, Tavily, Exa, Gemini deep research, AMiner, Google Scholar) with adaptive engine selection based on query type. Returns ranked, deduplicated results with metadata (authors, venue, year, citations, abstract, PDF link). Use when the user asks to find papers / literature / publications / preprints / references on a topic, search for related work, look up a specific paper by title or DOI or arXiv ID, find papers by an author, find recent SOTA / state-of-the-art work, survey a research area, or run a deep / comprehensive literature search with synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineering design cycle covering requirements elicitation, specifications writing, constraint identification, iterative prototyping, and design communication. Spans the full loop from problem definition through ideation, analysis, prototyping, testing, and redesign. Includes morphological charts, TRIZ, Pugh matrices, design reviews, and the distinction between functional and non-functional requirements. Use when framing engineering problems, generating design alternatives, writing specifications, or running design reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the primary outcome is creating publishable source-attributed content from URLs or supplied material, including research summaries, articles, briefs, and posts whose factual claims and quotations need reader-visible, verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly asks Rewrite Room to route documentation work, or when audit/sync/freshness, user-facing authoring, citation-driven writing, docs-to-skill conversion, and AI-instruction optimization overlap and exactly one workflow must be chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies and teaches Python 3.11+ modernization patterns with PEP citations. Use when reviewing or writing Python code to apply built-in generics (PEP 585), pipe unions (PEP 604), walrus operator (PEP 572), match-case (PEP 634), Self type (PEP 673), exception notes (PEP 678), StrEnum, tomllib, pytest-mock fixtures, Typer Annotated syntax, or Rich terminal output — or when refactoring legacy typing imports or elif chains to modern equivalents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。