「classification」の検索結果

Detect unauthorized SaaS and cloud service usage (shadow IT) by analyzing proxy logs, DNS query logs, and netflow data using Python pandas for traffic pattern analysis and domain classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WAF (ModSecurity/AWS WAF/Cloudflare) logs to detect SQL injection attack campaigns. Parses ModSecurity audit logs and JSON WAF event logs to identify SQLi patterns (UNION SELECT, OR 1=1, SLEEP(), BENCHMARK()), tracks attack sources, correlates multi-stage injection attempts, and generates incident reports with OWASP classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes malware samples in Cuckoo Sandbox to observe runtime behavior including process creation, file system modifications, registry changes, network communications, and API calls. Generates comprehensive behavioral reports for malware classification and IOC extraction. Activates for requests involving dynamic malware analysis, sandbox detonation, behavioral analysis, or automated malware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AEM Cloud Service expert skill for Sling Scheduler. Routes to path-a.md (Runnable + OSGi properties) or path-b.md (Sling Jobs via JobManager). Covers classification, CS-specific constraints (no @SlingScheduled, multi-pod runOn, Boolean type hint), review checklist, troubleshooting fingerprints, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses LLM output failures including hallucinations, constraint violations, format errors, and reasoning issues. Provides root cause classification, prompt fixes, tool improvements, and new test cases. Use for "debugging AI", "fixing prompts", "quality issues", or "output errors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in drone systems, computer vision, and autonomous navigation. Specializes in flight control, SLAM, object detection, sensor fusion, and path planning. Activate on "drone", "UAV", "SLAM", "visual odometry", "PID control", "MAVLink", "Pixhawk", "path planning", "A*", "RRT", "EKF", "sensor fusion", "optical flow", "ByteTrack". NOT for domain-specific inspection tasks like fire detection, roof damage assessment, or thermal analysis (use drone-inspection-specialist), GPU shader optimization (use metal-shader-expert), or general image classification without drone context (use clip-aware-embeddings).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models protocols where authority, scarce resources, bonds, bounties, escrow, reputation, ordering, adjudication, or settlement create strategic incentives. Use to test attack utility, conservation, collusion, Sybil resistance, oracle capture, griefing, custody, liquidity, and residual risk. NOT for choosing payment or bond amounts without evidence, smart-contract code audit, legal or employment classification, DeFi trading, admitting workers, or settling claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates DAG incidents with a precise top event, timeline, competing hypotheses, barriers, propagation, and bounded recovery. NOT for automated root-cause classification, trace collection, or performance profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。