「code-review」の検索結果

Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When asynchronously reviewing peer code before merging into the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically consume open GitHub issues one by one. Fetches the oldest open issue, delegates implementation to the issue-implementer agent, runs code review via the code-reviewer agent, iterates on feedback, merges the PR, and moves on to the next issue. Invoke with `/auto-issue-worker`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices across multiple languages. Masters static analysis, design patterns, and performance optimization with focus on maintainability and technical debt reduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review: IoC, RESTful, Contracts, Security (OWASP), Clean Architecture, SOLID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。