「did」の検索結果

Weekly business retrospective. Reads all snapshots, learnings, skill-usage telemetry, and (if provided) revenue data from the past week. Outputs: what got decided, what shipped, what's stalled, skill activity, suggested next focus. Surfaces unused skills as activation prompts. Use at end of week or end of sprint. Triggered by: 'weekly retro', 'business retro', 'what did we ship', 'how's the week going', '周复盘', '业务回顾', '本周复盘'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace the full event chain for one Claude Code session into an ordered timeline of every event type with tool_name and summary, highlighting gaps, out-of-order events, and failures. Reads /api/events?session_id= and /api/sessions/:id from the Agent Monitor dashboard. Use when debugging what a session actually did, step by step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a first eval suite for an agent: mine real failures into cases, write behavioural checks over traces, and generate the runner. Use when the user wants evals, regression tests for an agent, a golden set, or asks how to know a prompt/model change did not break things. Do NOT use for a single task's done-check (goal-test) or for auditing context (context-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post project updates to team chat, gather feedback, triage responses, and plan next steps. Adapts to available tools (chat, git, issues, tasks). First run discovers tools and saves a playbook; subsequent runs execute from the playbook. Trigger with 'team update', 'post update', 'sync with team', 'standup', 'check team chat', 'feedback loop', 'project update', 'what did the team say'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and risk-screen a compact role-based method shortlist for a mathematical-modeling subquestion. Use after problem framing and data profiling, before model code generation, to propose a main candidate, a usable baseline, and at most one conditional fallback without padding the pool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to write, audit, or optimize a meta description, SEO description, SERP snippet candidate, duplicate description, description length, or description rewrite issue. For a sitewide metadata lifecycle including implementation and production validation, use page-metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surfaces PAC CLI upload errors and Dataverse async operation errors, pattern-matches against a known failure catalog, and optionally auto-fixes identified issues. Use when asked to: "diagnose deployment", "debug deployment", "deployment failed", "show deployment errors", "fix deployment issues", "show upload logs", "why did my deploy fail", or "troubleshoot upload".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a human-approved UI design lesson as a privacy-minimized local StyleSeed candidate, review it, and prepare an opt-in share package without transmitting project code, prompts, screenshots, or brand data. Use when a person asks StyleSeed to remember, learn from, generalize, review, or prepare a reusable rule from an accepted design correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a hard-won "golden path" from the current session as a reusable Agent Skill, so future sessions start already knowing it. Use it (1) right after non-trivial debugging, after working out a multi-step operational workflow, or after rediscovering project facts you didn't know up front — e.g. how to reach the dev/prod database, where credentials and env vars live, how to deploy, run migrations, or verify a change live; and (2) whenever the user says "remember this", "save this as a skill", "make a skill for this", "don't make me re-explain this next time", or otherwise wants a workflow preserved across sessions. Proactively recognize the moment even when unprompted: if a task took several attempts before it worked, used non-obvious tooling, or is likely to recur, harvest it without asking first. Delegates to a subagent when your tool supports one, or works inline, to extract the proven procedure into a new project-local or global skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing lead magnets that earn the email. The discipline of building gated content (ebooks, templates, checklists, swipe files, mini-courses, free tools) that delivers genuine standalone value while qualifying the lead and warming them for what comes next. Honest about thin-bait (overpromises, underdelivers), kitchen-sink-resource (everything, helps with nothing), and earned-value-magnet (delivers standalone value while qualifying the lead). Triggers on lead magnet, gated content, opt-in offer, ebook, checklist, template, swipe file, mini-course, free tool, content upgrade, freebie, opt-in, list-building offer. Also triggers when an audience is being asked for an email and the offer attached to that ask needs design discipline, when previous lead magnets converted but did not produce qualified leads, or when a lead magnet is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The operational playbook for launching a feature well. Positioning, internal alignment, customer comms, sales enablement, support readiness, rollout strategy, monitoring with pre-defined rollback triggers, post-launch measurement against spec hypotheses, and the discipline that distinguishes shipping from releasing from actually launching. Triggers on launch plan, feature launch, launch checklist, ship vs release, rollout strategy, gradual rollout, sales enablement, support readiness, launch announcement, post-launch measurement, launch failure, declared victory too early. Also triggers when planning a launch (any size, any segment), auditing an existing launch process, fixing the we shipped it but the metric did not move problem, or building a launch checklist for the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured after-action review (postmortem, retrospective) on a launch, incident, or completed project to capture timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, and actionable lessons. Use this skill whenever the user wants to run a postmortem, retrospective, AAR, or after-action review on any past event. Triggers on after-action report, AAR, postmortem, retrospective, retro, post-incident review, what went well what didn't, lessons learned, blameless postmortem, root cause analysis, RCA, five whys. Also triggers when the user has just shipped something or just resolved an incident and wants to capture learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic-only skill for Slurm scheduler and node-daemon issues on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod Slurm clusters. Scope mirrors the HyperPod troubleshooting guide. Invoke when the user reports a Slurm node stuck in down/drain, "Node unexpectedly rebooted" after auto-repair, slurmd not running, jobs stuck PENDING with REASON=Resources while sinfo shows idle nodes, jobs stuck COMPLETING after node replacement, GRES/GPU counts wrong, scontrol ping failing, slurmctld unresponsive, an Action:Reboot/Replace request that did not trigger HyperPod auto-recovery, or auto-resume not restarting a job. Also triggers on "drain before reboot", "diagnose a Slurm node", "investigate stuck jobs."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates python code that evaluates SageMaker models. Supports two evaluation types: LLM-as-Judge and Custom Scorer. Use when the user says "evaluate my model", "run a benchmark", "test model performance", "how did my model perform", "compare models", or other similar requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and score candidate brand, product, and domain names for memorability and pronounceability. Use when naming a new product, company, or feature, brainstorming brand names, or finding an available .com.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify a batch of emails into action categories (reply now, reply later, archive, delete, unsubscribe) and surface unsubscribe candidates. Use after a busy week, running inbox zero, or triaging email overload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates release management with changelog generation, semantic versioning, and release readiness checks. Use when preparing releases, generating changelogs, bumping versions, or validating release candidates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain one coherent company story across employees, investors, customers, candidates, and partners. Use when preparing all-hands meetings, investor updates, board presentations, recruiting narratives, or crisis communications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a site-wide SEO audit into a ranked PLAN.md: technical, content, links, local. A single page → page-seo-analysis. "why did our traffic drop"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan connected platforms for anomalies against stored baselines, with likely causes. "why did our CPA spike"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show autopilot status: health, auto-corrections, guardrails, escalations. "what did the autopilot change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。