2,666 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
既存変更から Issue → ブランチ → コミット・プッシュ（コマンド提示）→ PR を作成する Backward フロー。「変更から Issue と PR」「既存変更を PR に」「diff から Issue」「変更を Issue 化」「Backward フロー」などで起動。
Interacts with live Hunk diff review sessions via CLI. Inspects review focus, navigates files, hunks, and exact lines, reloads session contents, adds inline review comments, and paints attention marks on character ranges. Use when the user has a Hunk session running or wants to review diffs interactively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates high-quality image prompts for AI image generators (Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion). Use when user mentions "イラスト作成", "画像プロンプト", "プロンプト生成", or "画像生成".
Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts. Use when the user asks to show / diagram / visualize / sketch / illustrate what is going on, asks "what does this look like", "how does this flow", "show me the structure", or in Japanese 図で見せて / 図解して / 図にして / 構造を見せて / フローを見せて / 全体像を見せて / どうつながってるか見せて. Also use it proactively when an explanation is running long and a call tree, file tree, component tree, diff, Mermaid diagram, or a small HTML artifact would land faster than prose.
Use when the user wants all 16 personality types (16-minds plugin) to vote on a proposal — yes/no/abstain — to see stakeholder distribution, detect hidden objections, or simulate organizational consensus. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「全人格で投票」「16人格に賛否を聞いて」「ステークホルダーシミュ」「これ通せそう？」, English equivalents like "vote with all 16 minds" / "stakeholder simulation", or `--vote` flag on 16-minds commands. Different from /minds (which is for opinion divergence) — this is for binary judgment aggregation.
計画・差分レビュー・E2E計画・E2E結果を 1 つのブラウザページ（タブ切替）に統合表示する review-hub の操作手順。agent-review-kit のページを iframe で束ね、タブごとの承認ボタン（計画承認・E2E実行承認・PR作成承認）を wait-approval で受け取る。ステータスバー（フェーズ進行・作業メモ）と中断ボタン、セッション再開手順（status / resume）も定義する。計画→実装→PR のように承認ゲートを挟むフロー系スキルから参照される。Use when a skill needs to show plans, diffs, or E2E results in one tabbed browser page, wait for a browser-side approval gate, or resume an interrupted review session.
Unified pull request workflow: prepare a safe branch, run read-only review, fix Required findings, create/update a GitHub draft PR, and verify CI plus automated review comments. Subcommands: `create` (simplify + PR, skip code review), `review` (read-only findings only), `fix` (Required fixes + commit, no push), `simplify` (simplification only), `verify` (existing PR checks/reviews only). Use when creating or reviewing PRs, self-reviewing changes, simplifying PR changes, or requesting "PR作成", "レビュー", "簡素化". Do NOT use for responding to review comments or a lightweight review of the current working diff without the PR workflow (use the built-in /code-review instead).
Inspects PostHog Visual Review (VR) runs that gate PR merges with screenshot regression checks. Use when the user mentions "visual review", "VR", "snapshot diff", "screenshot test", "storybook regression", "playwright snapshot", asks why a PR is blocked or what changed visually, wants to triage the VR backlog, decide whether a snapshot diff is real vs flaky, or check whether a story has been changing across runs. Also invoke when a PR has a failing `visual-review` status check, when a PR comment mentions "Visual review", or when the user is on a branch with an open VR run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Change the sync configuration of an existing data warehouse schema — switch sync_type, pick a different incremental_field, set primary_key_columns, choose cdc_table_mode, or change sync_frequency. Use when the user asks "switch my orders table from full refresh to incremental", "this table is syncing too slowly / too frequently", "I need to pick a different incremental column", "set up CDC for this Postgres table", or when diagnosis of a failing sync pointed to an incremental-field or PK misconfiguration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Switch the current Cursor workspace to a different project directory using the cursor-app-control MCP. Use when the user asks to switch projects, open another repo, jump to a different codebase, or move to a worktree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consolidate PostHog error tracking issues that are the same actual error reported under different fingerprints. Use when the user asks "why do I have so many TypeError issues that look the same?", "merge these duplicates", "stop splitting this error into new issues", or wants to clean up fingerprint sprawl. Decides between a one-shot merge of existing issues and a durable grouping rule that keeps future events from creating new fingerprints. Does NOT group conceptually similar bugs across different runtimes, SDKs, or call sites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check out two branches in separate worktrees, start both dev servers on different ports, screenshot the same pages, and produce a visual diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve ordinary differential equations (initial and boundary value problems). Supports stiff/non-stiff systems, event detection, Hamiltonian/symplectic integration, parameter sweeps, and phase space analysis. Use for any ODE system in physics, engineering, or applied math.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end alternative splicing analysis from FASTQ to differential splicing results for short-read bulk RNA-seq. Aligns with STAR 2-pass cohort-style, performs junction QC (RSeQC, MaxEntScan, SpliceAI), runs rMATS-turbo and leafcutter for concordant differential analysis, optionally MAJIQ V3 for complex events / heterogeneous cohorts, isoform-switching with NMD/ORF/domain consequences (IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR v2 + DRIMSeq+DEXSeq+stageR DTU), and sashimi visualizations. Use when performing comprehensive splicing analysis from raw bulk RNA-seq data; for variant-driven splice prediction see splice-variant-prediction; for rare-disease single-patient outlier detection see outlier-splicing-detection; for full-isoform PacBio/ONT analysis see long-read-splicing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end 16S/ITS amplicon workflow from demultiplexed FASTQ to a consensus differential-abundance result, orchestrating cutadapt primer removal, per-run DADA2 ASV inference (learnErrors/mergeSequenceTables/removeBimeraDenovo), region-matched taxonomy assignment, a SEPP/Greengenes2 tree, alpha/beta diversity at a declared sampling depth (phyloseq/vegan, adonis2 paired with betadisper), compositional DA as a consensus of >=2 tools (ALDEx2/ANCOM-BC2) on unrarefied counts, and optional PICRUSt2 functional prediction gated on NSTI. Covers the stage-ordering decisions (primers before truncation, per-run error model, rarefy for diversity not DA, predicted potential not activity) and defers each per-step choice to the six microbiome skills. Use when staging an amplicon study end to end or chaining ASV inference, taxonomy, diversity, and differential abundance. For shotgun reads see workflows/metagenomics-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end ATAC-seq workflow from FASTQ files to differential accessibility and TF footprinting. Covers alignment, peak calling with MACS3, QC metrics, and optional TOBIAS footprinting. Use when running end-to-end ATAC-seq analysis from FASTQ to differential accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates the full path from differential expression results to redundancy-collapsed functional enrichment: choose ORA vs GSEA, convert gene IDs per method, run enrichGO/enrichKEGG/enrichPathway/enrichWP or gseGO/gseKEGG (clusterProfiler, ReactomePA, rWikiPathways), and visualize. Use when a DESeq2/edgeR/limma result must become enriched GO terms, KEGG/Reactome/WikiPathways pathways, or a GSEA leading edge; when the input is a full ranking for all genes (GSEA, named decreasing vector) or only a pre-selected list (ORA plus a defensible background universe); or when assembling DE-to-pathway end to end. The DE list and ranking statistic come from differential-expression/de-results; per-method nuance lives in the pathway-analysis skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps metabolomics results to biological pathways via over-representation (ORA), metabolite-set enrichment (MSEA/QEA), mummichog/PSEA on raw m/z peaks, and network-diffusion enrichment (FELLA), with correct background-set construction and honest interpretive ceilings. Use when interpreting differential metabolites or an untargeted LC-MS feature table in pathway context, choosing ORA vs MSEA vs mummichog vs topology, or setting the reference/background set. For annotation confidence levels feeding ORA see metabolomics/metabolite-annotation; for gene-set concepts see pathway-analysis/go-enrichment and pathway-analysis/gsea; for joint gene+metabolite pathways see multi-omics-integration/mofa-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze the competitive landscape for an SCF submission. Identifies similar projects on Stellar and other chains, assesses overlap and differentiation. Use when reviewing or drafting an SCF submission and you need to map similar projects on Stellar and other chains and articulate the differentiation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。