「does」の検索結果

Tests Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run and monitor it to completion for Provisioned (Python DAG, via Airflow REST API) and Serverless (YAML workflow, via StartWorkflowRun). Verifies the artifact is deployed and parse-ready, triggers with confirmation, polls to terminal state, and on failure delegates diagnosis to debugging-mwaa-workflow and artifact/redeploy fixes to authoring-mwaa-workflow, then retests up to a capped number of attempts. Triggers on: test my DAG, test my workflow, run my DAG, trigger a test run, does my DAG work, smoke-test the pipeline, verify my workflow runs, execute my DAG to check it. Not applicable to writing or deploying a new workflow (handled by authoring-mwaa-workflow), or for diagnosing why a run failed or root-causing an error (handled by debugging-mwaa-workflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adds user authentication to web and mobile apps with Amazon Cognito (user pools and identity pools) and the AWS Amplify client auth libraries. Covers sign-up/sign-in flows and the login page (Cognito-hosted UI / managed login), MFA, password policies, OAuth 2.0 / OIDC flows (auth-code + PKCE, client credentials), social/SAML federation, tokens (ID/access/refresh, rotation, revocation, storage), Cognito Lambda triggers, identity pools (temp AWS creds), and gating API Gateway (or ALB) routes to signed-in users via Cognito/JWT authorizers. Applies when adding a login or sign-up page, configuring a user pool or app client, choosing user pool vs identity pool, wiring social/SAML, refreshing tokens, requiring sign-in on an API Gateway or ALB, or debugging redirect_uri/token/MFA/CORS/federation errors. Does NOT cover Amplify Gen2 backend definitions (defineAuth, npx ampx → aws-amplify), IAM/STS/Identity Center (→ aws-iam), or API Gateway/Lambda resource config beyond the authorizer (→ aws-serverless).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides an end-to-end data-warehouse migration to Amazon Redshift — discovery, schema/SQL/stored-procedure/macro/script conversion, data migration, validation, performance comparison, and reporting. Source-routed via `references/<source>/`; Teradata (Vantage) is the supported source; additional sources are added as their own `references/<source>/` sets. Text-only knowledge (no executable code) — the AI generates all execution at runtime. Applies when a user wants to migrate Teradata to Amazon Redshift, convert Teradata DDL/SQL/stored procedures/macros/BTEQ to Redshift/RSQL, or assess Teradata-to-Redshift migration complexity. Applies only to migrations targeting Amazon Redshift; migrations to other platforms (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, etc.) are out of scope regardless of source. Does not cover general Redshift administration, performance tuning, or troubleshooting of existing Redshift clusters (no migration involved), or sources not listed under references/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provisions, scales, and operates Amazon EC2 virtual-machine workloads: instance-type selection (Graviton/Arm64, burstable T credits, GPU, instance store vs EBS), launch templates, Auto Scaling groups (scaling policies, instance refresh, mixed instances, Spot, warm pools, lifecycle hooks), IMDSv2, placement groups, Elastic IPs, AMI lifecycle, and Systems Manager fleet operations (Session Manager, Run Command, Patch Manager). Applies to EC2 instance and fleet questions, InsufficientInstanceCapacity, CPU-credit/surplus charges, IMDSv2 401s, instances stuck in Pending:Wait, ASG not replacing unhealthy instances, status-check failures, SSH refused/timed out, or instances missing as SSM managed nodes. For a single secure instance launch, the launching-ec2-instance-with-best-practices skill is more appropriate; for instance profiles, see setting-up-ec2-instance-profiles; for Image Builder, see amazon-ec2-image-builder. Does NOT cover Lambda, ECS/Fargate, EKS, VPC/ALB/NLB design, or IAM policy authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures CI/CD pipelines using AWS CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodeConnections, and CodeArtifact. Covers CodePipeline V2 (triggers, variables, execution modes, cross-account), buildspec.yml (caching, VPC, Docker), CodeDeploy strategies (blue/green, canary, linear), CodeArtifact (private package registries, auth tokens, cross-account), and source connections (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket). Applies when CodePipeline, CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodeConnections, CodeArtifact, buildspec.yml, appspec.yml, or CI/CD pipeline orchestration is referenced. Does NOT cover: ECS Fargate services or task definitions (use aws-containers), CDK Pipelines or cdk deploy (use aws-cdk), sam deploy (use aws-serverless), Amplify deployments (use aws-amplify), or GitHub Actions/GitLab CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides verified corrections for IAM behaviors that AI agents frequently get wrong — policy evaluation edge cases, trust policy gotchas, STS session limits, Organizations quirks, and SAML/MFA specifics. Also provides structured workflows for IAM role management and baseline policy generation from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON. Covers condition operator safety (ForAnyValue/ForAllValues with Null checks), bucket policy deny patterns (VPC endpoint restrictions, org paths), confused deputy protection, and service role creation for AWS services (Glue, CloudTrail, Lambda, ECS, etc.) with aws:SourceAccount/aws:SourceArn trust conditions. Applies when creating IAM roles, writing IAM or bucket policies, generating policies from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON, working with STS, Organizations, or condition operators, or any task needing a service or execution role. Does not cover non-IAM authorization like Cognito user-pool policies or app-level RBAC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides general use of AWS messaging and streaming services. Covers Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon MQ, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Data Firehose, Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, and Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK). Use when reasoning about messaging and streaming patterns. Also identifies which AWS service owns each customer communication channel: email (Amazon SES), and WhatsApp, SMS, MMS, RCS, voice and mobile push (the AWS End User Messaging family of services). Routes the request to the specialized skill for that channel. Defers to the channel's specialized skill when the user already named a specific channel. In general, use specific skills or documentation searches for detailed service-specific questions. Do NOT use for MSK or Managed Service for Apache Flink questions, prefer specific skills. Does not configure customer communication channels; defers to specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a feature from a spec file or description using TDD workflow. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: add a new CLI command, implement a feature from a spec, build new functionality, add a flag, create a new internal package, or write Go code for skillshare. This skill enforces test-first development, proper handler split conventions, oplog instrumentation, and dual-mode (global/project) patterns. If the request involves writing Go code and tests, use this skill — even if the user doesn't explicitly say "implement".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terminal security analysis for shell environments. This skill should be used when checking commands for supply-chain attacks before execution, scanning repositories for hidden content or config poisoning, scoring URLs for homograph attacks, setting up AI tool protection, inspecting Python package artifacts, governing untrusted tasks or Web3 commands, auditing browser extensions, creating provenance receipts, downloading and executing scripts safely, investigating why tirith blocked a command, managing trusted patterns, running security audits, configuring MCP gateway proxies, or working with threat intelligence databases. Also use when the user mentions "tirith", "pipe-to-shell", "homograph", "ANSI injection", "zero-width", "punycode", "terminal security", "shell hook", "cloaking detection", "supply chain attack", "bidi override", "invisible unicode", or "config poisoning". Even if the user does not explicitly name tirith, use this skill when they ask about protecting shell environments, intercepting dangerous commands, or hardening AI agent tool execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Geolocate or chronolocate a photo with tool-verified reasoning (where was this taken / when was it taken / photo geolocation / geo-guessing). Given one or more photos, intake.py does metadata, OCR and reverse image search (Baidu/Yandex) in one command; clues and candidates go on a candidate board (board.py) that ranks them and gives the next step; clues.py looks up calling codes, driving side, plates and area codes from region packs; for satellite and street view the machine ranks first and you look only at the top few (CLIP in sat_scan.py, DINOv2+SIFT in match.py); plus sun and shadow math, OSM Overpass and DEM skylines. Every conclusion is checked against real data; output is coordinates + error radius, evidence images and tiered confidence. Use when the user shares a photo and asks where was this taken / geolocate this / when was this taken / 这是哪 / 在哪拍的 / 帮我定位这张照片 / 网络迷踪 / 图寻 / 几点拍的.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clicks through every flow of an app clone and tests it for bugs: a test plan generated from the recon flows with happy paths and edge cases, Playwright end-to-end tests where possible, a browser click-through where not, and bug reports in a fixed format with severity, steps and evidence. Use when the user says "test my clone", "find bugs", "QA this", "click through everything", "write e2e tests", "does it work", or after /replica-build or /replica-backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares an app clone against the original: a feature parity score from the feature matrix (weighted by must, should, could) with the missing list in build order, plus a screenshot layout diff that ignores colour so a rebrand does not count against you. Two standard-library Python tools. Use when the user says "how close is my clone", "compare it to the original", "what's missing", "parity check", "diff the screens", "is it ready", or after /replica-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing a value proposition. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint. For non-leading interview technique, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model software around the business domain using bounded contexts, aggregates, and ubiquitous language. Use when the user mentions "domain modeling", "bounded context", "aggregate root", "ubiquitous language", "anti-corruption layer", "context mapping", "domain events", "strategic design", "the code doesnt match the business", or "how do we split this big system". Also trigger when breaking a monolith into services, defining service boundaries, or aligning code structure with business processes. Covers entities vs value objects, domain events, and context mapping strategies. For architecture layers, see clean-architecture. For complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill, audit this skill, is this skill safe, vet a skill before installing, what does this skill access. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, spec validation, and security auditing of third-party skills before install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when users ask for a hand-drawn or illustrated image prompt, name one of the repository's 20 numbered styles or the 3.1 stable variant, or mention triggers such as 亲子手绘、家庭蜡笔画、蜡笔、吉卜力、水墨、像素、淡彩速写、动画概念、水粉、北欧绘本、纸雕、软胶潮玩、墨线绘本、暖色扁平绘本、圆头红线、暖黄墨线、family-crayon-card、warm-flat-storybook、roundhead-redline、warm-yellow-ink-story. Produces prompt text or a formal reference-bearing call bundle and does not generate images.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure writing-style statistics (sentence length, vocabulary, transitions, phrasing) from 5 to 10 posts you or your client wrote, and produce a voice profile for VOICE.md, blog-persona, and blog-write. Use for "learn my style", "build a writing baseline". It describes style; it does not detect or attribute authorship, and it is not for scoring a post (blog-analyze) or writing brand rules (blog-brand).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for video editing or video creation work that should be editable in OpenChatCut, even when the user does not explicitly mention OpenChatCut. Covers local/attached video editing, captions/subtitles, transcription, trimming, talking-head cleanup, highlights, B-roll, overlays, generation, export, project/editor opening, importing, targeting, verifying, watching, and identifying the active OpenChatCut project/editor URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and use a persistent, citation-traceable knowledge wiki from documents, research papers, notes, or project documentation. Use for llmwiki projects, retrieving reusable evidence for an agent task, or compiling a corpus for repeated questions. A one-off file read or live web search does not need a wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and distribute launch and publicity content across LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram, Discord, Medium, Substack, and YouTube. Produces per-platform copy that does not read as AI-written (no em dashes, no "thrilled to announce", no engagement-bait), plus the exact image/video specs and character limits each platform wants. Use this skill whenever the user wants to announce, launch, publicize, promote, cross-post, or share anything - a product, a feature, an open-source release, a research paper, a blog post, a demo video, a milestone, a job opening, or a conference talk. Trigger it on phrases like "post this on LinkedIn", "write a launch tweet", "announce this", "share this in Discord", "turn this into a thread", "what should I post", "write a Medium article about", "help me with distribution", "draft a YouTube description", "make this sound less like AI", or "de-slop this post". Also use it when the user has just finished shipping something and asks how to get it in front of people.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a LinkedIn post from a raw idea using 21 proven hook formulas, in the user's own voice, humanized so it does not read as AI. Use whenever the user wants a LinkedIn post, a hook, a draft for the feed, "post about X", "turn this into a LinkedIn post", or asks for hook options. Produces three hook options, one full draft, and a copy-ready block that is never published without an explicit yes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip the machine fingerprint out of any draft - em dashes, AI slop words, invisible watermark characters - and score it against a five-check detection panel before it goes out. Use whenever text needs to sound human, when the user says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", "will this get flagged", or before any LinkedIn post, comment, reply or DM is shown to the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs worksheets, workbooks and practice material that actually teach — sequencing difficulty, managing cognitive load, writing instructions a child can follow unaided, and building answer keys that hold up. Use this to design or fix a worksheet or workbook, decide how much practice a skill needs, structure a page so it can be completed without an adult reading it aloud, or diagnose material that looks right and does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。