「engineering」の検索結果

Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Babysits an open GitHub PR until merge-ready. Use when asked to watch a PR over time — not for one-shot comment resolution or one CI failure. GitHub (incl. Enterprise) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish, read, comment on, or edit markdown in Proof. Use for Proof links, sharing specs/plans/drafts, or publish handoffs from planning workflows; avoid proofread, math, evidence, or proof-of-concept meanings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer how something should work, feel, or read. Use when committing the wrong answer would be expensive to unravel and a cheap sketch cannot settle it. Not a rough visual probe during brainstorming, not for deciding what to build, not polishing a feature that already works, not implementing the real thing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge PR feedback centrally, apply valid fixes, and complete review conversations with publication verified. Use when addressing feedback already left on a PR, preparing local fixes for a caller to publish, or completing a saved feedback batch. Use ce-code-review for reviewing code before feedback exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize a named target with a measured loop: attribute a workload's cost, or score variants and keep winners. Use when a working system's metric should move and the winning change is not already known. Use ce-debug when the job is diagnosis; use ce-work when the change is already known.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retune a skill corpus for a new model, measurement-first: mine the run archive for a baseline, establish a noise floor, audit the corpus adversarially, then cut in measured passes until a pre-registered bar clears. Requires a benchmark harness that can A/B two builds of the corpus; refuses without one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hands-off, diff-scoped browser QA of the active branch: maps user flows, drives a real browser, autonomously fixes small breakages with regression tests and commits, judges experience against product personas, and writes a durable dogfood report. Manual invocation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a solved problem as a durable repo learning. Use when verified work produced non-obvious reasoning absent from its final code, tests, or existing docs; avoid routine fixes whose artifacts already explain the lesson.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop independent competing solutions to a defined brief, compare them, and synthesize a winning approach. Use when choosing well requires developing alternatives beyond their current form. Use ce-pov to judge developed material and ce-ideate to discover opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run browser tests for pages affected by the current branch or PR. Use when asked to run or check browser tests for the current change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplify settled, recently changed code for clarity, reuse, quality, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use after implementation and before review; use ce-debug for bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a git commit with a clear, value-communicating message. Use when the user asks to commit/save staged or unstaged changes with a repo-appropriate message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update STRATEGY.md. Use when starting a product, adding a strategy doc, or changing direction or roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh the repo's captured learnings against the current codebase. Use when auditing stale, overlapping, superseded, or drifted learnings; avoid general refactor, debugging, or code review unless the learnings store is explicit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite, check, or draft prose so it carries no AI writing tells, reads plainly on the first read, and keeps every source fact. Use when asked to make writing plainer or free of those tells, to check writing for them, or when drafting from supplied content. Use ce-promote for channel-specific marketing copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze recorded product feedback into evidence for bugs and requirements. Use when a Riffrec capture or other screen, voice, or notes artifact needs interpretation. Use for Riffrec setup, capture, or sharing help when no recording exists yet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweep configured feedback sources (Slack, GitHub Issues; email experimental) for new items: acknowledge at source, analyze recordings, verify fixes merged to main, and emit an `lfg`-ready plan. First run sets up sources; supports mode:non-interactive for scheduled runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for bugs and failing behavior. Use when asked to debug or fix failing or slow behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and evaluate grounded ideas. Use when the user wants ideas, improvements, or surprising directions before choosing one to develop. Not for refining an idea they already have (ce-brainstorm) or judging one already on the table (ce-pov).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up isolated git worktrees — create a new branch for fresh work, or attach a worktree to an existing branch, PR, or commit. Use when starting isolated work or isolating an existing ref.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain the last message, or a supplied file, link, or passage, in plain language a person follows on the first read. Use when the user invokes wtf because they did not follow something. Use ce-explain to investigate how or why code works, and ce-noslop to rewrite prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review requirements, plans, or specs with role-specific lenses. Use when the user wants to improve an existing planning document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。