「error」の検索結果

Use when writing Playwright tests, fixing flaky tests, debugging failures, implementing Page Object Model, configuring CI/CD, optimizing performance, mocking APIs, handling authentication or OAuth, testing accessibility (axe-core), file uploads/downloads, date/time mocking, WebSockets, geolocation, permissions, multi-tab/popup flows, mobile/responsive layouts, touch gestures, GraphQL, error handling, offline mode, multi-user collaboration, third-party services (payments, email verification), console error monitoring, global setup/teardown, test annotations (skip, fixme, slow), test tags (@smoke, @fast, @critical, filtering with --grep), project dependencies, security testing (XSS, CSRF, auth), performance budgets (Web Vitals, Lighthouse), iframes, component testing, canvas/WebGL, service workers/PWA, test coverage, i18n/localization, Electron apps, or browser extension testing. Covers E2E, component, API, visual, accessibility, security, Electron, and extension testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Error pattern tracking for AI agents. Detects corrections, escalates recurring mistakes, learns mitigations. The 'something's off' detector from the AI Brain series.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revisa o produce textos visibles para la persona usuaria (texto de UI, encabezados, botones, mensajes de error, marketing) con la voz y el tono del proyecto. Úsalo cuando la persona pida escribir/mejorar textos, corregir la redacción, revisar el tono o redactar microcopy (p. ej. "escribe el texto del estado vacío", "haz este mensaje de error más amable", "revisa el titular de la landing").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing TypeScript code, fixing type errors, or configuring strict type safety. Auto-activates on .ts/.tsx files. Covers null handling, utility types, and ESLint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build error triage: detect language, load fix patterns, auto-retry. Chains into mk:verify. NOT for runtime errors (mk:fix); NOT for architecture debugging (mk:investigate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review durable REST, GraphQL, RPC, or event-facing API contracts. Use for public or shared API contracts, endpoint/schema consistency, compatibility, pagination, error semantics, and API documentation. Discovers existing consumers and conventions before recommending a style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze reviewed Grafana log evidence for event patterns, error-rate changes, and enrolled security markers. Use when a user needs bounded log analytics for an incident window, error-log comparison, anomaly triage, operational debugging, or a cautious check of approved security signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building APIs on Hono (Cloudflare Workers, Bun, Deno, Node), debugging route ordering, wiring middleware, validating with @hono/zod-validator, returning streaming responses, configuring CORS with credentials, handling errors via app.onError, or composing typed RPC clients. Triggers: c.env binding types, c.header + c.redirect interaction, missing await next() bugs, Set-Cookie not attaching to redirect, route-precedence surprises, JWT middleware setup, hono/client typed RPC end-to-end. NOT for Express/Fastify/Koa idioms, tRPC/GraphQL paradigms, or Next.js Route Handlers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end form handling with react-hook-form, Zod schemas, validation patterns, error messaging, field arrays, and multi-step wizards. Use for complex forms, validation architecture, autosave, field dependencies. Activate on "form validation", "react-hook-form", "Zod", "form error", "multi-step form", "wizard". NOT for simple HTML forms, backend validation only, or non-React frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA, treating low-VAF detection as a signal-versus-noise problem set by error suppression and molecules sampled, not by the choice of caller. Distinguishes de novo CALLING (scanning a panel for unknown variants, bounded by per-locus error and multiple testing) from tumor-informed DETECTION (tracking a pre-specified variant set, where panel integration reaches single-ppm). Covers VarDict and Mutect2 for de novo calling, UMI-aware callers, and a pysam-based known-variant VAF tracker, with matched-WBC subtraction as the mandatory defense against clonal hematopoiesis (the dominant false positive). Use when calling or tracking tumor mutations from plasma cfDNA, setting a VAF threshold, or deciding whether a low-VAF call is tumor versus CHIP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model gene-family birth-death dynamics across a species tree using CAFE5 (Mendes et al 2020 Bioinformatics 36:5516 gamma-distributed rate categories), CAFE5-error (annotation-error-aware), Count (Csurös 2010 ancestral state reconstruction), BadiRate (Librado 2012 likelihood + parsimony), DupliPHY-Family, and ALE/AleRax (for per-family DTL; see [[gene-tree-species-tree-reconciliation]]). Test lineage-specific gene-family expansions and contractions, distinguish biological dynamics from annotation artifacts, account for assembly fragmentation, identify functional enrichment in expanded / contracted families. Use when correlating gene-family changes with phenotype evolution, ranking lineages by adaptive gene-family-rate shifts, post-WGD dosage-balance analysis, or building Birth-death models from OrthoFinder presence/absence matrices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses the patient’s ability to troubleshoot insulin pump malfunctions such as occlusion, battery failure, or error messages. Trigger phrases include “Review pump alarm responses” and “Ensure patient knows steps for pump error”.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pure API reference for reddapi.dev - authentication, all endpoints (vector search, semantic search, trends, subreddit lookup), request parameters, response schemas, and error codes, with no research-workflow framing. Use when the user wants raw endpoint documentation, is debugging a reddapi.dev integration, needs exact request/response field names, or asks for 'reddapi API reference', 'reddapi.dev endpoints', or 'reddapi error codes'. For guided research workflows and query playbooks, see reddit-research. For B2B lead scoring, see reddit-leads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides AI agents through Senzing entity resolution workflows using the Senzing MCP server. Covers data mapping to Senzing format, SDK code generation (Python, Java, C#, Rust, TypeScript/Node.js), documentation search, error troubleshooting, sample data access, reporting and visualization, SDK setup guides, and V3-to-V4 migration. Use when working with entity resolution, record matching, record linkage, deduplication, Senzing SDK integration, data mapping for Senzing ingestion, or troubleshooting Senzing error codes. Also use when the user mentions matching records across data sources, finding duplicate entities, identity resolution, master data management, or needs to resolve who is who across datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level communications engineering covering modulation, channel capacity, error correction, wireless systems, OFDM, MIMO, and 5G technologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level numerical methods knowledge. Use when working with root finding, numerical integration, numerical differentiation, interpolation, numerical linear algebra, ODEs, PDEs, or optimization algorithms. Also use when the user mentions 'Newton method', 'bisection', 'Runge-Kutta', 'finite difference', 'finite element', 'interpolation', 'numerical integration', 'quadrature', 'iterative solvers', 'condition number', 'round-off error', or 'truncation error'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management. Makes interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve unclear UX copy, error messages, microcopy, labels, and instructions to make interfaces easier to understand. Use when the user mentions confusing text, unclear labels, bad error messages, hard-to-follow instructions, or wanting better UX writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。