「find」の検索結果

Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug failing Power Automate cloud flows using the FlowStudio MCP server. The Graph API only shows top-level status codes. This skill gives your agent action-level inputs and outputs to find the actual root cause. Load this skill when asked to: debug a flow, investigate a failed run, why is this flow failing, inspect action outputs, find the root cause of a flow error, fix a broken Power Automate flow, diagnose a timeout, trace a DynamicOperationRequestFailure, check connector auth errors, read error details from a run, or troubleshoot expression failures. Requires a FlowStudio MCP subscription — see https://mcp.flowstudio.app

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Security: scan the codebase (the whole repository or a scoped part of it), scan changes (this branch's or a pull request's diff, or one commit), or suggest patches (findings turned into targeted patch files, each verified by a panel of agents, that you apply when you choose). Use when the user asks to scan, audit or check code with Claude Security, to scan their changes with Claude Security, or to fix or patch Claude Security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and operationalize Amazon GuardDuty, covering protection plans for S3, EKS, EC2 runtime monitoring, and Lambda, interpreting finding severity, and building automated response with EventBridge and Lambda. Use when establishing threat detection for AWS accounts, investigating findings on compromised instances or credential abuse, or building automated incident-response playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find people, companies, posts, jobs, service providers and groups on LinkedIn with the Curviate CLI. Covers `search people|companies|posts|jobs|services|groups`, running a pasted LinkedIn search URL directly, the `group` read commands, pagination with `--all`, and the filter traps that silently return unfiltered results. Use when sourcing prospects or candidates, qualifying companies, finding posts or job postings to engage with, or resolving a group.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the code graph database to understand component relationships, dependencies, and change impact. Use when the user asks to "find callers", "check dependencies", "what uses this", "show relationships", "find serializers", or when reading code and needing to understand what depends on a component before modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Google Calendar free/busy status for multiple users to find a meeting slot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token-hygiene audit of the always-loaded context stack — CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, auto-memory MEMORY.md, and the bootstrap-rendered identity files (SOUL.md, USER.md, ACCESS_POLICY.md, HEARTBEAT.md) or their harness equivalents. Finds redundancy, contradictions, stale content, compression candidates, and skill-extraction candidates; produces a ranked action list sorted by token savings with a risk class per finding. REPORT-ONLY: this skill never edits any audited file. Recommendations for bootstrap-rendered files target the interview answer bank / templates, never the rendered output. Judging routes through `gbrain eval cross-modal` (single cheap model by default; full multi-model panel is explicit opt-in).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds grant and solicitation opportunities the organization actually qualifies for, runs a hard go/no-go before anyone starts writing, drafts the application or response from past submissions and real program data, and tracks every deadline and reporting obligation that follows an award. Built for nonprofits, government contractors, and education, and it filters daily feeds like SAM.gov or DIBBS down to the handful worth bidding. Runs on Google Drive or M365 with DocuSign and Calendar deepening it, and works from uploaded past submissions plus web research when nothing is connected. Use this whenever a funding or bidding opportunity is in play — including "find grants we qualify for," "should we bid this," "draft the response to this RFP," "we've got 50 solicitations to filter," "what's due on the federal grant," or "help me write the proposal narrative."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build targeted account or contact lists using Common Room's Prospector. Triggers on 'find companies that match [criteria]', 'build a prospect list', 'find contacts at [type of company]', 'show me companies hiring [role]', or any list-building request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fills the funnel end to end without the owner babysitting it — reads the market and the competition for context, builds a ranked list of named prospects with a reason attached to each, writes personalized outreach in the owner's own voice, and logs every touch to the CRM. Chains lead-finder, outreach-composer, and crm-autopilot behind a web-native market read, with an owner approval at every handoff. Use this whenever the owner wants more pipeline rather than one specific piece of it, including phrasings like "I need more leads," "fill my funnel," "who should I be calling and what do I say," "find me customers like my best ones and reach out," "build me a prospect list and write the emails," or "sales has gone quiet, get something moving." Reach for it when the owner describes wanting new business generally rather than asking for a list or a single email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find a time, draft the invite, and book the meeting on Google Calendar or Outlook - then log it to the CRM as an event on the right account and opportunity. Use when the user says "schedule a follow-up with [contact]", "book the demo with [account]", "find time with [name] next week", "send my Calendly link", or "get the QBR on the calendar".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the repository's docs/ content against the current codebase, find missing, incorrect, or stale documentation, and refresh the affected pages. Use when the user asks to review docs coverage, find outdated docs, compare docs with the current repo, or fix documentation drift across features, settings, tools, or integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flag desktop<->den contract drift introduced by this diff. High findings gate Warden clearance; medium findings are advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find high-priority open NemoClaw security PRs to review, including competing or superseded candidates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and read information on the open web — fan-out web/news/finance search plus full-page fetching and source extraction. Use to answer current questions, gather and cite sources, verify a claim, or pull text from specific URLs. Triggers: 'search the web', 'look this up', 'find sources on', 'what's the latest on', 'fetch this page', 'is it true that…', 'compare X vs Y'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。