1,823 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Workflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage a stateful, run-directory-based proof project: continuation across runs, run-local source bookkeeping, manual GPT Pro handoff packages when a local attempt stalls, and an optional DeepSeek second opinion as additional evidence only. Use when the user asks for proof-run orchestration, a GPT Pro handoff, or cross-run proof continuation — use /proof-writer for ordinary proof drafting and /proof-checker for rigorous verification or submission acceptance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow 3: Full paper writing pipeline that goes from a narrative report to a polished, submission-ready PDF. Use when user says "写论文全流程", "write paper pipeline", "从报告到PDF", "paper writing", or wants the complete paper generation workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Paragraph-level structural blueprint for 10-12 page systems papers targeting OSDI, SOSP, ASPLOS, NSDI, and EuroSys. Provides page allocation, paragraph templates, and writing patterns. Use when user says "写系统论文", "systems paper structure", "OSDI paper", "SOSP paper", or wants fine-grained structural guidance for a systems conference submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow 3: Full paper writing pipeline. Orchestrates paper-plan → paper-figure → paper-write → paper-compile → auto-paper-improvement-loop to go from a narrative report to a polished, submission-ready PDF. Use when user says \"写论文全流程\", \"write paper pipeline\", \"从报告到PDF\", \"paper writing\", or wants the complete paper generation workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports — catching hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations. Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile LaTeX paper to PDF, fix errors, and verify output. Use when user says "编译论文", "compile paper", "build PDF", "生成PDF", or wants to compile LaTeX into a submission-ready PDF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
KubeSphere multi-tenant management Skill. Use when user requests to create users, workspaces, projects, or assign roles/permissions. Supports user lifecycle management, workspace configuration, project creation, role binding. Do not perform any delete operations, do not create custom roles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when operating KubeSphere DevOps as a namespace-scoped tenant with limited permissions, without cluster-admin access, or when accessing DevOps through KubeSphere APIs only
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and monitor OpenShell GitHub issues and PRs using the gator:* state machine. Use when asked to triage issues/PRs for project validity, gate PRs, run gator, validate submissions, or monitor PRs toward merge readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs the CARLA Leaderboard evaluator over a set of routes with your agent — routes/routes-subset/repetitions/track selection, checkpoint and live-results endpoints, resume after a crash, recording, and the debug levels — for leaderboard 1.0, 2.0 or 2.1. Preflights the whole stack (version pairing, maps, ports, agent class, sensor budget) before spending hours, and hands the world back in async mode. Use when the user asks to "run the leaderboard", "evaluate my agent", "run routes_training", "resume an evaluation", or "reproduce my submission locally".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. For systems venues (OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP), use systems-paper-writing instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces explicit user permission before any file deletion. Activates when you're about to use rm, unlink, fs.rm, or any operation that removes files from disk. MUST be followed for all delete operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure a usable SageMaker execution role exists before deploying or training. Use this skill whenever about to create a SageMaker endpoint, model, training job, or any resource that requires an execution role. Use it especially when the user has not provided a role ARN explicitly, when scripts are about to call `iam:CreateRole`, or when an AccessDenied error mentions an IAM action. Never blindly call `iam:CreateRole` — always check for existing roles first. This skill prevents the most common SageMaker deployment failure: trying to create IAM resources from an SSO principal that has no IAM write permissions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a demand letter from a completed intake, gated on a privilege / FRE 408 / waiver / admission checklist, with a .docx output, post-send checklist, and an offer to create a matter. Use when the user says "draft the demand", "write the [type] letter", or has a finished demand intake ready to turn into a sendable draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only Google Drive sharing and permission audits with gog.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Yao process execution expert. ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user needs to call a Yao process, query data models, run scripts, or check process permissions. Do not call processes without checking this skill first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core Native SDK guide for AI agents. Read this before explaining the Native SDK or changing a Native SDK app. Establishes TypeScript + Native markup as the default app-authoring path, routes default app work to the native-ui and ts-core skills, and covers the shared foundation: project structure, app.json and legacy app.zon, lower-level App and Runtime patterns, frontend integration, web engines, JavaScript bridge commands, permissions, windows, WebViews, dialogs, packaging, debugging, and testing. Use when the user asks what the Native SDK is, how to build or modify an app, how to package or debug it, or how to add native capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarifies that file creation tasks are complete when the deliverable is successfully written—no submission step required
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。