2,365 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a source code change needs a changelog entry, or before committing and pushing any bug fix, feature, or behavior change to source code - detecting when entries are required, categorizing changes correctly (added/changed/fixed/deprecated/removed/security), writing user-facing titles, and creating the JSON entry in .changelogs/
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing changed or staged code, a branch, or a PR in the Handsontable monorepo across architecture, code quality, performance, accessibility, and tests. Covers SOLID / Law of Demeter / plugin decoupling / breaking-changes policy, custom ESLint rules / JSDoc / naming / cognitive complexity, large-array and render-batching performance, WCAG 2.1 AA + keyboard navigation, and the tests a change ships (a named exercising test per new path, scoped mutation, a ticket on every weakened assertion). Trigger when asked to review changes, check a diff against Handsontable conventions, assess architectural correctness, spot performance regressions, verify accessibility, or judge whether a change's tests prove it, and as the design lens before or while implementing any core change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a verified correction or repeated workflow into a reusable local learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query Cloud Trace spans, filter by latency thresholds or error status, correlate distributed traces with Cloud Logging, and diagnose latency bottlenecks across Google Cloud services. Use when investigating slow requests, analyzing trace hierarchies, or resolving latency regressions. Do NOT use for querying non-GCP telemetry or database query optimization outside Cloud Trace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and prevents vbar_control_agent segfaults, out-of-memory (OOM) errors, and TPU device initialization failures on TPU v6e nodes in GKE caused by race conditions during TPU device resets or high-frequency metrics polling. Use when troubleshooting vbar_control_agent crashes, memory cgroup OOMs in serial console logs, tpu-device-plugin metrics checksum corruption errors, or custom TPU metrics collection conflicts on GKE TPU v6e nodes. Don't use for general non-TPU container OOM troubleshooting or standard GKE node lifecycle operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leverages BigQuery's built-in machine learning and GenAI capabilities for advanced data analytics. Use when you need to write SQL queries that perform time-series forecasting, predict values, detect outliers or anomalies, find key drivers, perform semantic search or vector search, classify text, calculate similarity, summarize content, translate language, evaluate models, filter by semantic conditions, measure the causal effect of an intervention, compute correlations between columns, detect change points or structural breaks, extract trend or seasonality components, or leverage generative AI capabilities in BigQuery. Do not use for general BigQuery dataset, table, or job management requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On-call alert triage runbook for {{sentry_project}}. Pulls the Sentry stack trace, correlates Datadog logs around the spike, checks {{target_repo}} for the deploy that shipped just before, classifies severity against known-noisy patterns, posts a first-pass diagnosis to {{incident_channel}}, and pages a human only when severity is at or above {{page_severity_threshold}} or the alert can't be resolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodic sweep that finds incidents marked resolved in {{incident_channel}}, correlates the channel timeline against GitHub deploys/merges and Datadog log spikes over the incident window, and drafts a structured postmortem as a PR under {{postmortem_path}} in {{target_repo}} — root cause and action items proposed, never finalized.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for structured review, fact-checking, annotation, and correction of documents such as PDF, DOCX, PPTX, and XLSX files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-grounded context refresh: reads constitutional files, TELOS, and CURRENT_STATE/IDEAL_STATE dimension files via TelosFreshness, pulls observed data (Oura sleep/HRV, Conduit app-time, work registry, git, expenses via StateEvidence), and drives a peer conversation that opens with claim-vs-evidence contradictions, drafts corrections for ratification, and closes with a ComputeGap-grounded ideal-state review. Routes to ContextCheckin; Phase0Setup on fresh install. USE WHEN /interview, resume interview, context check-in, telos check-in, what's stale, stale data, freshness check, update current state, update my current state, state sync, statusline says interview due, interview due, review TELOS, update ideal state, quarterly context refresh, fresh LifeOS install, configure DA name. NOT FOR single edits (Telos), bulk intake (Migrate), identity-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hreflang and international SEO audit, validation, and generation. Detects common mistakes, validates language/region codes, and generates correct hreflang implementations. Use when user says "hreflang", "i18n SEO", "international SEO", "multi-language", "multi-region", or "language tags".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, clarity, and potential issues. Use when the user asks for a review, code review, PR review, or wants feedback on a diff or file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数学形式化与 proof-assistant 验证。用户要求 Lean 4/Mathlib、formal proof、kernel check、无 sorry 编译，或需要把自然语言定理切成可形式化定义和引理时使用。缺少 Lean 工具链时必须 fail-closed。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in the paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports — catching hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations. Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", "引用核对", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan recent git commits for changes that affect user-facing behavior, then draft or update the corresponding documentation pages. Use when docs have fallen behind code changes, after a batch of features lands, or when preparing a release. Trigger keywords - update docs, draft docs, docs from commits, sync docs, catch up docs, doc debt, docs behind, docs drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize, adopt, and route work for a separate Obsidian knowledge vault through the portable claude-obsidian core. Use for vault setup, scaffolding, workspace selection, cross-project configuration, or choosing the correct wiki sub-skill. Triggers: /wiki, set up wiki, scaffold vault, create knowledge base, adopt this vault, Obsidian vault, second brain setup, persistent wiki.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spawns pedestrians that wander autonomously via WalkerAIController, and destroys them in the correct order. Pairs each walker.pedestrian.* with a controller.ai.walker, places them on the navigation mesh, and sends them to random navmesh points at walking speed. Use when the user asks to "spawn pedestrians/walkers", "add people/crowds", "make pedestrians walk around", or "remove the walkers". Reads the world settings first: if the world is already synchronous it never ticks it, and if it is asynchronous it makes it synchronous and drives the clock itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds PyTorch FSDP2 (fully_shard) to training scripts with correct init, sharding, mixed precision/offload config, and distributed checkpointing. Use when models exceed single-GPU memory or when you need DTensor-based sharding with DeviceMesh.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries to identify failure points, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs. Use when investigating errors, analyzing stack traces, finding root causes of unexpected behavior, troubleshooting crashes, or performing log analysis, error investigation, or root cause analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, debugs, and refactors JavaScript code using modern ES2023+ features, async/await patterns, ESM module systems, and Node.js APIs. Use when building vanilla JavaScript applications, implementing Promise-based async flows, optimising browser or Node.js performance, working with Web Workers or Fetch API, or reviewing .js/.mjs/.cjs files for correctness and best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。