1,027 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read and apply a project-specific BUILDING_SPEC.md or DIMENSIONS.md file before generating any architectural elements. Use when: generating floor plans, 3D buildings, or any spatial design where the project has defined custom dimensions, room requirements, or design standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for architectural dimensions, proportions, and building codes for AI-generated 3D/2D models. Use when: generating floor plans, creating 3D buildings, validating architectural designs, ensuring correct human-scale proportions in models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a controlled experiment (A/B test) so its result can be trusted: writes the hypothesis, picks one primary metric and the guardrails, computes sample size and run time, specifies how visitors are assigned and when exposure is logged, and reads out the result with a confidence interval. Use when someone says "set up an A/B test", "split test this page", "how many visitors do I need", "how long should the experiment run", "is this result significant", "can I stop the test early", or wants to test a headline, price, layout or onboarding change against the current version.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing ITAR/EAR compliance, ECCN classification, party screening, technology control plans, or deemed exports - covers US export control regulationsUse when ", " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google and Meta paid media account structure evaluation. Audits campaign/ad set architecture against conversion volume minimums, budget thresholds, and targeting overlap. Identifies over-segmentation, under-segmentation, budget fragmentation, and structural anti-patterns blocking algorithmic learning. Provides consolidation roadmaps with migration plans. Use when inheriting accounts, quarterly health checks, or before scaling budgets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a multi-phase project from an orchestrating main thread that plans, routes and verifies but does not build. Defines a few long-lived workstreams, each owning a file area end to end in its own worktree, and routes every follow-up to the owning agent instead of spawning a one-off. Covers base-SHA recording, rebase-before-commit, stale-checkout detection, and shared-machine hygiene (ports, processes, measurement noise). Use when a project spans several phases or sessions with three or more agents working at once.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The implementation engine. Routed to by /sprint (full plan, autonomous) and by executing-plans (scoped batch, checkpoint-gated). One fresh subagent per task — test-first via tdd — followed by spec-compliance review, quality review, and fresh-run verification. No single context accumulates drift, and nothing is accepted on a subagent's word.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create stakeholder alignment artifacts including responsibility matrices, decision frameworks, and communication plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product covering OKR cascade generation, quarterly planning, competitive landscape analysis, product vision documents, and team scaling proposals. Use when creating quarterly OKR documents, defining product goals or KPIs, building product roadmaps, running competitive analysis, drafting team structure or hiring plans, aligning product strategy across engineering and design, or generating cascaded goal hierarchies from company to team level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate detailed content briefs for blog posts with target keywords, content outlines, competitive analysis, recommended statistics, image and chart suggestions, word count targets, internal linking architecture, template recommendations (12 types), TL;DR drafts, citation capsule planning, information gain prompts, and multi-channel distribution plans. Briefs are optimized for Google rankings and AI citations (GEO/AEO). Use when user says "content brief", "blog brief", "write brief", "outline blog", "plan blog post", "blog outline", "content outline".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic topic cluster planning and automated execution engine for claude-blog. Performs SERP-based keyword research, groups keywords by search intent and SERP overlap, builds a hub-and-spoke cluster architecture, generates an interactive SVG cluster map, and executes the full cluster by orchestrating blog-write calls with shared cluster context and automatic internal-link injection. Fills the strategy-to-execution gap: blog-strategy plans the blueprint, blog-cluster builds the house. Use when user says "blog cluster", "topic cluster", "content cluster", "cluster plan", "cluster execute", "pillar content", "hub and spoke", "content ecosystem", "cluster map".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create accessibility testing plans covering assistive technologies and WCAG criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking code against a spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a stale, inherited, or messy codebase — deps, bugs, security, tests, CI, docs, UI/UX — then emit a phased, testable modernization plan. Read-only: plans upgrades, never applies them. Not for single-PR review, PRD-to-tasks, or UX-only audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a site for agent readiness via isitagentready.com — for 'make this site agent-ready' or 'scan this site', incl. localhost. Plans the 0-5 gaps and files issues via /plan-to-issues. Not for SEO/llms.txt fixes or app-store ASO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate app/startup ideas with market, feasibility, commercial, and open-source competitor analysis. Use when asked to evaluate, validate, or score a product idea. Don't use for PRDs, go-to-market plans, or investor decks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede Thought Graph shipping search for a multi-file repo change. Use when competing implementation plans need one evidence-gated selection before any build. Halts on hazards, collisions, budget exhaustion, or no safe winner. Reads production; never deploys. NOT FOR: bulk independent work (use a separate private worker-fleet pass); findings-only diff review (use suede-code-review); CI or branch-protection wiring (use suede-ci-gate); copy-only shipping (use suede-ship-copy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede Labs agent-team orchestrator: split complex work into coordinated lanes with explicit file ownership, WIP collision detection, quality gates, escalation thresholds, rollback plans, and handoffs that prove what shipped. Use when one shared change needs safe parallel ownership across builders and reviewers, when a lane map must be resolved before anyone opens a file, or when running a repeatable public-repository contribution program with issue scoring, atomic task leases, isolated worktrees, and explicit publication authority. NOT FOR: one repo change a bundled DAG can run end to end (use suede-graph-flo-xr); findings-only review of a diff (use suede-code-review) or an A-F ship grade (use suede-code-grader); CI, branch protection, or merge-gate wiring (use suede-ci-gate); branch and worktree setup on a stale mirror (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned measurement discipline for tracking plans, event and conversion instrumentation, UTM and campaign-parameter hygiene, and verification of what actually fires. Use when setting up, auditing, or repairing analytics across web, product, paid, and lifecycle surfaces. NOT FOR: experiment design or significance decisions (use suede-ab-testing), campaign optimization (use suede-ads), attribution models, model comparison, or cross-tool reconciliation (use suede-attribution), or revenue-process architecture (use suede-revops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。