645 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
When shaping the primary message, supporting proofs and audience-by-message matrix from a locked positioning frame — before any copy or launch beat. Triggers on 'tighten the message stack'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate or troubleshoot Interlateral CLI mesh transport: tmux socket discovery, direct-send helpers, comms.md ledger, identity stamping, idle checks, ACK proof, and safe prompt injection. This is comms mechanics only, not a collaboration workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to prove fix correctness with adversarial code proof traces — a skeptic tries to DISPROVE the fix and trace all related paths first, with confidence scoring and stack-trace-style evidence chains, so confidence is earned by surviving attack, not by confirming it works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating Product Hunt launch carousel images for developer tools, AI tools, open-source projects, GitHub launches, or technical products. Research comparable launches, inspect the project, extract verified proof points, then generate 4-5 launch-ready images with consistent branding, product surfaces, readable copy, and source-grounded claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, and integrate generalized validation harnesses across a producer-consumer boundary after a local harness contract exists. Use when refactoring custom validation CLIs/MCPs for large polyrepos, extending Steward across sibling repos, or deploying a local tool to a consumer project for dogfooding and testing; use mcp-harness-repo-maintainer first for initial steward.yaml adoption and cold-start proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or refresh screenshot-led product hero images, localized interface captures, and image-led README sections for GitHub repositories. Use whenever a user asks to make a GitHub README show a GUI product visually, add software screenshots, design a README hero image, reproduce a screenshot-collage reference, or prepare repository-bound visual documentation. For GUI applications, default to the deterministic product-proof split hero with real software screenshots unless the user explicitly requests another visual direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mathematical foundations, logical structures, and formal verification guidance. Trigger when: - Designing protocol contracts, formal specifications, verifying state spaces, or using proof assistants. - Tasks involve: TLA+, Alloy, Lean, Coq, model checkers, invariants, temporal logic. - Prompt contains keywords: formal verification, alloy, tla+, lean, coq, invariant, state machine, model checker, liveness, safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cleanly tear down a crouton poc/app — the inverse of /deploy. Removes the code, the Cloudflare Worker + D1 + KV (both env scopes), the app's stray branches, and closes its epic/sub-issues — with a --dry-run first and a typed confirm for anything destructive. Use when asked to "remove an app", "tear down a poc", "delete app X and its resources", or to clean up after an abandoned proof-of-concept. Counterpart to /deploy, /poc-deploy, crouton init.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spearphishing targets specific individuals using personalized, researched content that bypasses generic spam filters. Email security gateways (SEGs) like Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint,
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress review pressure into the right next action instead of more code by default. Classify findings, reject non-liabilities, and choose proof-only vs minimal-fix vs refactor-kernel, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn. Use after a code review — PR comments, reviewer suggestions, or audit findings — and especially when you are about to reflexively patch every comment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brutally honest AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md review backed by real A/B test evidence. Not just opinions — actual proof that your rules are dead weight. Roasts instruction files for bloat, slop, and redundancy, then proves it by running evals. Use when user says "roast my agents.md", "roast my CLAUDE.md", "prove my rules are useless", "eval roast", or wants entertaining evidence-based feedback on their AI config files. Also triggers on "audit my instructions" or "are my rules helping".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile deep repository evidence into artifact-bound correctness doctrine — authority/law/proof maps, owned invariants, failure archaeology, and the strongest durable destination for each piece of knowledge, plus an optional minimal repository-specific skill portfolio. Use when the user wants both deep codebase understanding AND durable doctrine, knowledge routing, or repo-specific skill recommendations. Research discoverable facts before asking. Read-only. Not for quick onboarding, one isolated invariant, ordinary implementation, generic review, or direct skill creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Récupérer les preuves d'un courrier envoyé via l'API Merci Facteur avec getProof — preuve de dépôt, avis de réception signé, preuve de téléchargement d'un recommandé électronique. Utiliser quand il s'agit de récupérer, télécharger, archiver ou afficher un AR, une preuve de dépôt ou un justificatif d'envoi, ou de savoir si un recommandé a été distribué.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a study cheatsheet by extracting and synthesizing key concepts from lecture materials, homework, and past exams. Use this skill whenever a user asks for help making a cheatsheet, study sheet, formula sheet, exam reference sheet, or "one-pager" — especially when they upload lecture slides (PDF/PPTX/DOCX), problem sets, past exams, or scanned/handwritten notes. Trigger this even for casual phrasings like "help me prep for my final," "summarize my course materials into something I can bring to the exam," or "make me a study reference from these slides and homeworks." Tuned for math/science (formulas, proofs, theorems) and CS/engineering (code, algorithms). Processes one file at a time and persists intermediate summaries to disk to avoid blowing past the context window on large courses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a campaign idea, its objectives and the supporting notes (audience material, offer facts, budget and dates, channel list) into one DRAFT one-page campaign brief: objectives, audience, one single-minded message with sourced proof points, channels and timeline, success measures with baselines, mandatories, risks and numbered open questions for the campaign owner. Use when the user asks to "write a campaign brief", "draft a creative brief for this launch", "turn this idea into a one-page brief", "tighten this brief to one page" or "build the marketing brief from these notes". Do not use for a message house, messaging pillars or a launch narrative on its own, use message-house-builder instead; for laying the campaign onto dated slots, use content-calendar-planner. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve complex or high-impact problems when the cause, solution path, requirements, or proof boundary is genuinely uncertain. Use when work needs evidence-led diagnosis, consequential design or implementation, or a completion audit; do not trigger merely because work has multiple steps, or for simple facts, fully specified routine changes, or pure creative generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Send one research question to as many independent LLMs as possible at once, each in its strongest reasoning mode with proof of that mode, then synthesize. Floor of 3 models, quorum of 4; late answers are collected later. Use for high-stakes questions where one model's view is not enough. Triggers: /hyper, hyper research, ask every LLM, max fan-out research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。