「ref」の検索結果

Audits a manuscript's citations for fabricated or nonexistent sources, DOIs that resolve to a different work, mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list, APA 7 or journal style, and whether each source supports the claim it is attached to. Checks entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, and DataCite and labels anything it could not verify NOT CHECKED. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs, or when a source may be AI-invented. Figures and tables go to figure-table-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a manuscript's citations for fabricated sources, DOIs that resolve to the wrong work, in-text and reference-list mismatches, style, and claim support, verified against Crossref and OpenAlex. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a referee report on someone else's manuscript for a journal editor, using five adversarial finders, a Blue Team error filter, a Chief Reviewer synthesis, and a Tone Guard legal pass. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript; self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, author responses to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic code understanding with IDE-like symbol operations. Use when: (1) Large codebase analysis (>50 files), (2) Symbol-level operations (find, rename, refactor), (3) Cross-file reference tracking, (4) Project memory and session persistence, (5) Multi-language semantic navigation. Triggers: "find symbol", "rename function", "find references", "symbol overview", "project memory". IMPORTANT: Prioritize Serena's symbolic tools over file-based grep/read for code exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or redesign evidence-based README files for apps, libraries, CLIs, monorepos, and agent skills. This skill should be used for /readme-write, /readme, generate readme, write readme, improve readme, 帮我写 README, 美化 README, README を書いて, README 작성해 줘, напиши README, or their equivalents in any language. Confirm reader and visual preferences before generation; every README includes a source-backed flowchart, and every language edition keeps identical content apart from the language. Git-driven updates are routed to the companion readme-update skill.

Comprehensive UI design guidance based on Refactoring UI principles covering design personality, color theory, layout strategy, visual hierarchy, typography, spacing, mobile-first responsive design, and writing copy that doesn't read like AI wrote it. Use this skill whenever the user is creating new pages, building components, making design additions or changes, reviewing UI code, asking about design decisions (colors, fonts, spacing, layout), writing or editing interface copy, or discussing visual improvements. Trigger for any design-related conversation including "how should this look", "what color", "font size", "spacing", "layout", "responsive", "mobile", "this copy", "headline", "button text", "microcopy", or when reviewing/critiquing existing interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or change AuthCrunch portal refresh configuration, opaque token families, atomic rotation, replay revocation, issuance claims, store adapters, and portal lifecycle. Use for portal refresh tokens, not upstream OAuth token renewal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the local SQLite refresh-storage plugin, its public parser, atomic rotation and replacement, replay history, durability and lifecycle, and refresh-engine consumer tests. Excludes automatic portal backend selection and storage for OIDC or OAuth sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine the sentence structure and style of the documents: shorten long sentences, replace cumbersome nominal constructions with verbs, make enumerations parallel, strike filler words and redundancy, fix awkward transitions, and adjust voice, while content, numbers, and technical terms stay exactly as they are. Use when the user wants to "refine", "tighten", or "polish" the wording of a document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor Code: Use when user wants to "refactor" or "change" the code base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively edit and refine a named plan for a task through a conversational loop. Each round, the current plan is shown and the user is asked whether to keep refining, mark the plan as done, or proceed to the implementation or draft. Use when the user wants to plan a task purely through chat-driven refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insert, format, and cross-reference academic citations in Word (.docx) documents. Supports GB/T 7714-2015, IEEE, APA 7th.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insert, format, and cross-reference academic citations in Word (.docx) documents. Supports GB/T 7714-2015 (Chinese), IEEE, and APA 7th.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Silently restructures the user's natural-language prompt into the format the model CURRENTLY running this skill handles best, then answers. On activation it identifies which model family is executing it (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, GLM, Command, Nova, or Phi) and loads that one model's official strategy — so the optimization always matches the model that actually runs it. Activate with /prompt-refine. Use when users want better answers without learning prompt engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverages Ahrefs REST API v3 to identify content gap opportunities through competing domain analysis. Pulls referring domains data, anchor text distributions, and DR metrics to prioritize content creation for link-worthy topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or update automated tests for a change using the repository’s verification rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use when implementing a feature, bugfix, refactor, or regression test; prefer stable integration/API/UI coverage and pull deeper test strategy from the bundled references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor with tests first, one change at a time, never mix refactoring with bug fixes or new features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflective Memory. Use when working with memory, reflection, context management, or intent tracking. Provides the reflective memory practice — how and when to use keep tools for capturing insights, tracking commitments, and maintaining awareness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract maximum value from existing code — performance optimization, API surface refinement, and dead weight elimination. The art of turning base code into gold through systematic identification and amplification of value-bearing patterns. Use when optimizing a working but sluggish codebase, refining an API surface that has accumulated cruft, reducing bundle size or memory footprint, or preparing code for open-source release — when code works correctly but doesn't shine and needs polish rather than a full rewrite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference Hildegard von Bingen's Physica natural history knowledge. Covers classification of plants, stones, animals, fish, birds, elements, and trees with their medicinal, symbolic, and practical properties. Enables cross- referencing between categories and application guidance. Use when exploring a specific plant, stone, or animal from Hildegard's perspective, researching medieval natural history and cosmology, cross-referencing properties across categories, or integrating Physica knowledge into health, spiritual, or creative practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-stage alchemical code transmutation — nigredo (decomposition), albedo (purification), citrinitas (illumination), rubedo (synthesis) — with meditate and heal checkpoints between stages. Transforms tangled or legacy code into optimized, well-structured output through systematic material analysis. Use when transforming legacy code into modern equivalents, refactoring deeply tangled modules where incremental fixes keep failing, converting a codebase between paradigms, or when simpler refactoring approaches have stalled and a full-cycle transformation is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。