「scope」の検索結果

Implement, fix, refactor, or remove repository code under required scope, non-regression, verification, and review gates. Use whenever a task may change a production, test, script, or other implementation artifact, including build logic, generated source, and behavior-affecting configuration. Also use it alongside a specialized code-changing Skill. Do not use for read-only analysis or review, diagnosis-only work, or prose-only changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Apache ShardingSphere's written coding standards when explicitly requested, or when code-implementation routes task-changed production, test, script, build, generated, or Maven POM artifacts through repository standards. Also perform a standalone read-only compliance audit of a user-specified scope. Use CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, applicable AGENTS.md rules, Checkstyle, Spotless, and other repository-defined standards, including naming and evidence-based defensive-code rules. Do not invoke independently for an ordinary implementation already governed by code-implementation, and do not independently audit architecture, runtime ownership, caches, or lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

New-hire onboarding runbook for {{projectName}}. Detects new-hire records via the {{new_hire_group}} group in Google Workspace, then works one scoped case per hire — preparing the Workspace account and group memberships, adding them to the right Slack channels, and filing a first-week checklist in the {{onboarding_project}} Linear project — holding account creation and group membership for a human approval gate and posting the result to {{notify_channel}}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-platform operations runbook for the Slack control-pane agent. Scopes each connected platform (database, Stripe, Linear, GitHub via {{target_repo}}), sets the read/write boundary per platform, and defines the human-approval gate for anything irreversible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-angle exploration running 2-8 sequential passes over the same problem, each through a different scientific lens, to surface hidden requirements and edge cases invisible from one angle; each pass yields new ISC criteria. USE WHEN iterative depth, explore deeper, multi-angle analysis, surface hidden requirements, blind spot check, what am I missing. NOT FOR scope/zoom analysis (use ApertureOscillation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and run the checks that actually cover a change in the verdaccio monorepo — rebuild the touched packages, run their tests and their dependents' tests, the api integration suite, the e2e CLI battery or the Cypress UI suite when the change is client- or UI-visible — and recognise the cases where a scoped run passes without testing anything. Use whenever verifying a change before committing or pushing, or when deciding what to run after an edit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for lark-cli setup/auth tasks: auth login/status/logout, user vs bot identity, business-domain permissions (--domain, including all/docs/drive), missing scopes, revoking authorization, or handling _notice JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh Codex reviewer with no prior context; base output is same-family provisional. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics DETERMINISTIC slice (numeric core + rules-only reporter) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher, then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Codex-native limitation: upstream ships no Codex-native auditor pack, so the full nine-dimension semantic sweep requires a Claude Code session — this pack runs the honestly-scoped deterministic-only mode (it can flag, it can never say CLEAN). Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses fresh-agent GPT-6-Astra review (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses cross-model review (external reviewer backend) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when operating KubeSphere DevOps as a namespace-scoped tenant with limited permissions, without cluster-admin access, or when accessing DevOps through KubeSphere APIs only

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and filter Datadog logs from the shell using the Composio CLI. Run scoped log searches, pivot across services/environments, and export structured JSON for downstream agents instead of click-driving the Datadog UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub PR checks with gh, pull failing GitHub Actions logs, summarize failure context, then create a fix plan and implement after user approval. Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing PR CI/CD checks on GitHub Actions and wants a plan + code changes; for external checks (e.g., Buildkite), only report the details URL and mark them out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为 MNN 框架添加新的 LLM 模型支持。支持从 HuggingFace/ModelScope 下载模型，分析架构，添加映射，Hook 对齐测试，导出 MNN 模型。采用 TDD 模式，分 6 步执行，每步有独立测试标准。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer an explicitly vault-scoped question from an Obsidian wiki without changing it. Use when the user selects the vault as the evidence source: query the wiki, query quick, query deep, explain from the wiki, summarize the vault, find in wiki, search the wiki, or based on the wiki. Do not route ordinary general-knowledge questions here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds CARLA on Unreal Engine 5.8 from the ue58-dev branch using its CMake build system — configure a preset, then build the carla-unreal / carla-unreal-editor / carla-python-api-install / launch targets — with ROS 2, DLSS, RSS and cook-scope options, and the engine-side build of the CarlaUnreal UE 5.8 fork. There is no Makefile and no Util/BuildTools in this tree, so every UE4 `make` recipe is invalid here. Use when the user asks to "build CARLA UE5", "build ue58-dev", "compile CARLA with cmake", "rebuild the Python API", or hits a CMake configure or target failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the smallest possible code change that fixes a specific, well-scoped issue (CI failure, reviewer comment, typo). Use only when the fix target is explicit. Never refactor unrelated code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent verification agent for loop-produced changes. Finds reasons to reject. Runs tests. Confirms diff scope. Use after minimal-fix or any implementer sub-agent — never in the same role as the implementer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft client proposals and statements of work that scope, price, and win the project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。