1.3万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Manages Python library releases including semantic versioning, changelog maintenance (Keep a Changelog format), release automation with GitHub Actions, and deprecation workflows. Use when planning releases, writing changelogs, automating release pipelines, or communicating breaking changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clinical Research Bias Assessment - Case-Control Study (NOS) v2.3.0. Use when you need to assess the bias of a case-control study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, or when evaluating the quality of a medical paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing a plan, finishing a development branch, wrapping up a session, or at any natural transition between work phases — reviews skill-bus telemetry to identify subscription gaps and suggest improvements
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect pauses and silence in audio using local dynamic thresholds. Use when you need to find natural pauses in lectures, board-writing silences, or breaks between sections. Uses local context comparison to avoid false positives from volume variation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Distill the current conversation into a structured note (decisions made, open questions, file pointers with line numbers, next 1–3 actions) and save to `quality_reports/session_logs/` before auto-compression. Differs from `/checkpoint` (explicit stop-point snapshot) and from auto-compaction (which truncates rather than distills). Use when context is approaching auto-compact threshold, when a long pipeline has accumulated many decisions, or when the user says "compress", "distil this session", "before we hit auto-compact", "structured handoff before context resets".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or assess an evidence-grounded, falsifiable outcome hypothesis: a testable prediction of what measurable business result will change, for whom, by when, and how leading and lagging indicators will prove or disprove it. Use when framing measurable outcomes, turning an MVP, POC, feature, or technical initiative into a beneficiary result, defining targets and indicators, or judging whether evidence is strong enough to invest. Also applies to business outcome hypotheses, value hypotheses, and outcome statements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses macOS system-level slowness, heat and fleet-wide timeouts: high load average, leaked per-session child processes (MCP servers, helpers), fork storms, busy loops. Use when the Mac feels slow or hot, fans spin up, or everything times out at once (电脑发烫/卡顿/负载高/全部超时). Not for single-app bugs, network slowness (use tunnel-doctor), launchd watchdog design (use macos-watchdog), or disk-full (use macos-cleaner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Snapshots, restores and reconciles Claude Code / Codex sessions inside Ghostty tabs across reboots. Use when quitting the Mac for an update (保存终端会话 / 重启前备份终端), after restart to reopen tabs with their original session IDs (恢复之前的窗口 / restore my ghostty tabs), or to audit which sessions survived. Not for resuming one conversation via its own --resume, terminal screenshots, or tmux state. Also use for periodic change-only snapshots (定期增量快照 / 没变化不记录). Also use before or after a manual Codex account switch (额度耗尽换号 / 换号后恢复全部 Codex).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up QA testing processes: test strategies, Google Testing Standards test cases, P0-P4 bug tracking, quality metrics, progress reports, autonomous execution via master prompts, and OWASP security testing, with third-party QA handoff docs. Use when establishing QA infrastructure, writing test cases, executing test plans, or tracking bugs. Not for auditing an already-rendered UI (use frontend-visual-qa).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 数据出境要申报吗, 数据出境安全评估还是标准合同, 个人信息出境标准合同怎么备案, 我们把数据传到海外总部合规吗, or decide how to transfer data out of mainland China lawfully. Produces a data map of what leaves China, the route that applies (an exemption, the personal information export standard contract, certification, or a CAC security assessment) with the thresholds to confirm, the filing steps, and the documents to prepare, including the personal information protection impact assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up and run a body-doubling session — using another person's presence (in the room, on a call, or a chat check-in) to start and stay on the task your ADHD brain keeps bouncing off. Use when someone says 'I can't start this task', 'body double with me', 'I only work when someone's around', or has ADHD/executive-dysfunction and a task that won't begin. Produces a session plan, the exact ask to send a body-double partner, and a solo fallback for when no one's available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan tests for an API endpoint or service — functional, negative, and contract. Use when asked to test an API, write API test cases, plan REST/GraphQL endpoint testing, or validate an API contract. Produces an API test plan — per-endpoint cases (status codes, schema, auth, validation, errors), boundary/negative cases, contract checks, and non-functional notes — so the API is verified beyond the happy 200.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as a body-double for a work session — a present, low-pressure companion that keeps you accountable and moving through the task without doing it for you. Use when asked be my body double, keep me company while I work, help me focus on this task, or I work better with someone there. Produces a session structure (goal, time block, check-in cadence), gentle presence and momentum nudges at intervals, distraction rescue when you drift, and an end-of-session acknowledgment — recreating the focus that comes from someone just being there.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess whether and how someone can safely stay in their own home as they age — the home hazards, the support gaps, and the modifications and services that make it work. Use when asked can my parent stay in their home safely, aging in place assessment, is it safe for them to live alone, or what do we need for them to stay home. Produces a room-by-room safety read (fall hazards, accessibility), an honest look at the daily-living and support gaps, the modifications and services that could close them, warning signs that home may no longer be safe, and how to raise it respectfully — helping a family make a clear-eyed, dignity-preserving decision. Not medical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and resume interrupted Copilot CLI sessions using session_store queries
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work with Typeform: list forms and responses, create forms, and (with confirmation) manage response webhooks. Trigger phrases: typeform, form responses, typeform webhook, typeform forms, create form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce and continuously maintain ONE living review document for a multi-item session — a cockpit header (Progress checklist, Working folder, Context) plus per-item review cards that you approve or request changes on directly in the doc or side panel. Use whenever a session has multiple deliverables you need to review/approve (meeting-processing + planning, multi-ticket work, briefs with several drafts, any "do X, then plan/draft Y and Z"). The doc is the interaction surface: you edit it (or reply in chat) to approve/change; the agent keeps it live as work progresses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General-purpose X/Twitter research agent. Searches X for real-time perspectives, dev discussions, product feedback, cultural takes, breaking news, and expert opinions. Works like a web research agent but uses X as the source. Use when: (1) user says "x research", "search x for", "search twitter for", "what are people saying about", "what's twitter saying", "check x for", "x search", "/x-research", (2) user is working on something where recent X discourse would provide useful context (new library releases, API changes, product launches, cultural events, industry drama), (3) user wants to find what devs/experts/community thinks about a topic. NOT for: posting tweets or account management. Note: currently uses recent search (last 7 days). Full-archive search is available on the same pay-per-use X API plan but not yet implemented in this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。