「standards」の検索結果

Grade a trading card using PSA, BGS, or CGC standards. Covers observation-first assessment (adapted from meditate's unbiased observation), centering measurement, surface analysis, edge and corner evaluation, and final grade assignment with confidence interval. Supports Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when evaluating a card before professional grading submission, pre-screening a collection for high-grade candidates, settling condition disputes between buyers and sellers, or estimating the grade-dependent value spread for a card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement policy-as-code enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate and mutate Kubernetes resources according to organizational policies. Covers constraint templates, admission control, audit mode, reporting violations, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left policy validation. Use when enforcing resource configuration standards, preventing security misconfigurations such as privileged containers, ensuring compliance before deployment, standardizing naming conventions, or auditing existing cluster resources against policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and preserve insect specimens following museum-grade standards including legal compliance, collection methods, humane dispatch, dry pinning, wet preservation, labeling, storage, and curation. Covers permit requirements, protected species regulations, sweep nets, beating trays, pitfall traps, light traps, Malaise traps, aspirators, ethyl acetate killing jars, freezing, pin placement by order, wing spreading, ethanol preservation for soft-bodied specimens, specimen labeling with locality and date, storage with pest management, and database entry. Use when building a reference collection for taxonomic study, preserving voucher specimens for ecological research, preparing specimens for identification by specialists, or curating an existing collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "$aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoring finished content against quality dimensions, evaluating whether a piece meets publishable standards, or determining which workflow phase needs rework based on quality gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide academic writing with standards. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with academic-writing-guide related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating /goal directives, reusable testable outcome-oriented success standards for agentic workflows. Use whenever the user asks to create a goal, write a /goal directive, define what good looks like, set success criteria for an agent, define a reusable instruction, create a quality standard, write acceptance criteria for an agent workflow, or specify done conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Peer review checklist and quality standards for intelligence products, plus schema validation for graded evidence items and claim tables from /quality-of-information-check and /claim-extraction. Rejects outputs that break the evidence schema or the grading caps. Loaded by the quality-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about ISAC participation, TAXII feeds, MISP communities, FIRST, STIX-based sharing, or how to publish intelligence externally. Covers sharing models, standards, communities, and TLP-governed dissemination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create aesthetically beautiful interfaces following proven design principles. Use when building UI/UX, analyzing designs from inspiration sites, generating design images with ai-multimodal, implementing visual hierarchy and color theory, adding micro-interactions, or creating design documentation. Includes workflows for capturing and analyzing inspiration screenshots with chrome-devtools and ai-multimodal, iterative design image generation until aesthetic standards are met, and comprehensive design system guidance covering BEAUTIFUL (aesthetic principles), RIGHT (functionality/accessibility), SATISFYING (micro-interactions), and PEAK (storytelling) stages. Integrates with chrome-devtools, ai-multimodal, media-processing, ui-styling, and web-frameworks skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents and users to create standards-compliant agent definitions using templates in markdown frontmatter format, ensuring context gathering, clarity, and proper metadata. Forces agents to ask clarifying questions when context is insufficient. Token-efficient documentation required. All content must be in English. Trigger: When creating a new agent definition, setting up project agents, or documenting agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive, data-backed email marketing knowledge base. 908 sources, 4,798 insights. Use when reviewing email setups, building automation flows, diagnosing deliverability, writing email copy, selecting platforms, or pulling Standards. Covers strategy, flows, deliverability, copywriting, segmentation, compliance, cold email, and 19 industry playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply network economics to analyze markets with network effects, critical mass dynamics, and platform competition. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate tipping points, lock-in risks, switching costs, or standards wars, especially in technology platforms and two-sided markets.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design customer service operations including tiered support (L1/L2/L3), response templates, SLA definitions, escalation procedures, and complaint handling. Use this skill when the user needs to set up a CS team, create service standards, design escalation flows, or improve response quality — even if they say 'our CS is a mess', 'how should we handle complaints', 'set up support tiers', or 'create CS SOPs'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate TypeScript/JavaScript code quality with ESLint, Prettier, type checking, and security analysis. Use for TypeScript/JS codebases to ensure code quality and standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify compliance with OWASP Top 10 2021 security standards. Use when performing OWASP compliance checks and security certification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。