「thesis」の検索結果

Formulate clear, testable hypotheses for product experiments. Use when designing experiments to validate solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see data-and-funnel-analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models and hardens an application, API, data flow, dependency, or deployment against authentication and authorization flaws, injection, secrets exposure, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, abuse, privacy loss, and supply-chain risk. Use for security review, threat modeling, hardening, or sensitive changes. Not for generic code style review or an unexplained bug without a security hypothesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds repeatable deep-research workflows for verified synthesis. Use when producing evidence-backed briefs, comparisons, dossiers, or research pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply @aleabitoreddit ("Serenity")'s distilled stock-analysis method to ANY ticker, sector, or situation — critical-chokepoint / supply-chain-OSINT idea discovery, first-principles value-chain decomposition, a Buffett-style quality gate (moat / profitability / customer-replacement risk, all default unverified), and narrative-vs-fundamentals hygiene. Produces a beginner-friendly Chinese analysis (她的观点 / 小白解释 / 第一性原理 / Buffett 直接判断 / 当前结论) that classifies an idea as 研究地图 vs 可投资结论. Trigger on "analyze like Serenity / 用 aleabito 的方法分析 / 用 Serenity 框架 / critical chokepoint 分析 / 第一性原理 + Buffett 判断这只股 / supply-chain bottleneck thesis". Never emits buy/sell calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrating ecosystem self-evolution: lifecycle-phase detection, agent relevance, cross-agent knowledge synthesis, evolution proposals. Use when auditing skill-ecosystem health or fitness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, analyze media intelligence, and tell people from AI agents on a website (Agent Detection) using direct Resemble AI API calls

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when a user needs to inspect, score, repair, or regression-test academic paper formatting in DOCX files, especially thesis, journal, or conference documents with a separate format specification. The skill guides Codex through local-first document handling, rule extraction, formatting repair, report review, and contribution-safe validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, deepen, validate, index, and maintain a private hierarchical career knowledge graph from supplied career materials. Use when the user asks to create or update a VitaeGraph, model education with nested courses or thesis work, enrich projects from Git repositories, or supply deep selected career context to another VitaeContext skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, study, and answer questions about long books and papers without loading the whole text into one context window, keeping page-anchored notes as a reusable workspace. Use whenever the user asks to read, study, summarize, analyze, review, or answer questions about a long book, textbook, PDF, EPUB, thesis, dissertation, survey paper, or any document of roughly 50+ pages, in any language (Vietnamese "đọc sách", "tóm tắt sách", "phân tích luận án"). Also use when a `{slug}-notes/` workspace from a previous session sits next to a source file and the user asks a follow-up question about that book. Not for short documents (under ~30 pages) that fit in context; read those directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adaptive conversion of LaTeX, PDF, or Markdown sources into a complete Word .docx that follows a user-supplied .docx template. Use when pandoc --reference-doc alone is not enough — for thesis, dissertation, report, or institutional Word formatting that needs cover pages, declarations, TOC, heading numbering, captions, three-line tables, equations, citations, and visual verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the insurance product design, payout terms, and pricing assumptions for viability and profitability. Use when critiquing thesis, economics, risk controls, underwriting assumptions, premium strategy, and solvency posture of this vehicle insurance protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A/B test design — produce an experiment spec with hypothesis, primary metric, MDE, sample size, run time, and decision rule. Also determines when NOT to A/B test and what to do instead. Use when asked to "design an A/B test", "should we test this", "experiment design", "how do we know if this works", "what's the sample size", or "set up an experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User research reconnaissance — survey existing personas, research docs, interview notes, and feedback artifacts to establish what is already known about users. Use when asked to "what research exists", "review existing personas", "what do we know about our users", or before starting new research or synthesis work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User researcher — interviews, personas, Jobs-to-Be-Done, and customer feedback synthesis. Use when asked to "run user interviews", "build personas", "synthesize feedback", or "find the job-to-be-done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a chaos engineering experiment — hypothesis, blast radius, steady state, and abort conditions. Use when asked to "design a chaos experiment", "inject a failure", or "test the resilience of this service".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for speculative multi-agent drafting, parallel hypothesis generation, AST-aware consensus arbitration, and multi-model code reconciliation / Panduan ahli penyusunan draf multi-agen spekulatif, generasi hipotesis paralel, arbitrase konsensus sadar-AST, dan rekonsiliasi kode multi-model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for autonomous deep research, iterative web search, citation verification, evidence graph synthesis, and hallucination mitigation / Panduan ahli riset mendalam otonom, pencarian web iteratif, verifikasi sitasi, dan mitigasi halusinasi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。