「understand」の検索結果

Reverse-engineer successful affiliate strategies from competitors. Use this skill when the user asks about spying on competitors, researching what other affiliates promote, analyzing competitor affiliate sites, understanding how top affiliates in a niche make money, or says "what programs does X promote", "how does [site] make money", "what affiliate strategy does this site use", "spy on competitor affiliates", "reverse engineer affiliate site", "copy what works in my niche", "who are the top affiliates in X niche", "what content gets traffic in my niche", "competitor affiliate analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand temporal meaning in context without performing calendar arithmetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-dimension scorecard (0-100, grade A/B/C/F) for a scaffolded harness. Dimensions: Repo understanding (25%), Agent usefulness (25%), MCP safety (20%), Test coverage (15%), Publish readiness (15%). Emits a 6-field badges block (score + mcpRisk + 4 booleans) ready for the harness README. Exit 0 A/B, 1 C, 2 F.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses. Use when an AI research agent needs to handle conference, journal, workshop, or grant reviews; classify reviewer concerns; decide what evidence or experiments can change the decision; write an AC-facing executive summary; draft per-reviewer responses; correct factual misunderstandings without sounding hostile; handle novelty, baseline, method, experiment, clarity, and scope objections; or produce a final rebuttal checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your Claude Code conversation history to identify patterns, common mistakes, and opportunities for workflow improvement. Use when user wants to understand usage patterns, optimize workflow, identify automation opportunities, or check if they're following best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive documentation explaining how a codebase works, including architecture, key components, data flow, and development guidelines. Use when user wants to understand unfamiliar code, create onboarding docs, document architecture, or explain how the system works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Question-first approach to understanding user journeys. Load when starting a new journey design or when the discovery phase needs deepening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to understand customers deeply enough to write copy and pick targeting — consumer versus shopper, JTBD, layered persona, internal monologue, pain map, objection list, journey map, and a customer language bank pulled from real reviews and DMs. Trigger on 'customer insight', 'buyer persona', 'who is my customer', 'what do they actually want', 'jobs to be done', 'why do they hesitate before buying'. Also use when the user cannot explain who the product is for. Not for — intake questions when an agency signs a new client, see `20-client-intake-brief-global`; paid audience targeting setup, see `51-audience-research-global`; competitor study, see `08-competitor-research-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligently organizes your files and folders across your computer by understanding context, finding duplicates, suggesting better structures, and automating cleanup tasks. Reduces cognitive load and keeps your digital workspace tidy without manual effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts and analyzes competitors' ads from ad libraries (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to understand what messaging, problems, and creative approaches are working. Helps inspire and improve your own ad campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with this machine's local LLM setup (LM Studio + mlx-dspark) -- checking status, changing context window, diagnosing a reasoning hang or dead request, understanding RAM/speed tradeoffs, or wiring a new script to the local inference endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end academic paper writing workflow. Takes a research repository and produces a publication-ready LaTeX manuscript for top ML/AI conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM). Covers repo understanding, structure planning, section drafting, citation management, anti-AI polishing, and conference formatting. Triggers on "write paper", "draft paper", "scholar writing", "paper writing workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema; Use when developers need to understand a plan…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps a teacher prepare to teach an existing K-12 lesson (math / ELA / science / social studies) — a prep partner that thinks through the lesson's key student task with the teacher and leaves a short teacher-only prep note. Triggers on asks to internalize, prepare for, get ready to teach, or understand a lesson, including implicit ones ("help me get ready for tomorrow's lesson"), and right after another skill built a lesson, which it can follow. Not for building or adapting a lesson, grading, rubrics, assessment feedback, or generating quizzes or student-facing material, and not for single-fact lookups a sentence would answer ("what standard is this?", "how long is this lesson?").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a plugin", "scaffold a plugin", "understand plugin structure", "organize plugin components", "set up plugin.json", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "add commands/agents/skills/hooks", "configure auto-discovery", or needs guidance on plugin directory layout, manifest configuration, component organization, file naming conventions, or Claude Code plugin architecture best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive understanding of the spec-kit methodology. Constitution-driven feature development with specify, plan, tasks, and implement phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for managing R package lifecycle according to tidyverse principles using the lifecycle package. Use when: (1) Setting up lifecycle infrastructure in a package, (2) Deprecating functions or arguments, (3) Renaming functions or arguments, (4) Superseding functions, (5) Marking functions as experimental, (6) Understanding lifecycle stages (stable, experimental, deprecated, superseded), or (7) Writing deprecation helpers for complex scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write ggsql queries — a grammar of graphics for SQL. Use when the user wants to create, modify, or understand a ggsql visualization query.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, or otherwise declines or closes a community contribution. Also use when the maintainer needs to explain a deprecation, point out a user misunderstanding, or communicate an effort/scope tradeoff to a contributor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。