「viewer」の検索結果

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize, organize, and normalize messy research materials into an IEEE-ready writing brief before manuscript drafting. Use when Codex needs to process a folder or collection of experiment logs, code files, AI chat exports, idea notes, literature summaries, related-work notes, copied introduction excerpts, Zotero-derived paper summaries, tables, figures, or scattered Markdown/text records and convert them into structured inputs for ieee-writing, ieee-experiment, ieee-citation, ieee-reviewer, or ieee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, redesign, generate, and improve IEEE manuscript figures, tables, captions, result presentation, plotting scripts, visual polish, hybrid Python/R plus vector-editor workflows, publication-ready matplotlib house style, and layout using routed visual-evidence checks. Use when checking or creating plot readability, axes, legends, line overlap, table structure, metric reporting, captions, grayscale accessibility, IEEE one-column/two-column layout, figure/table placement, claim-evidence mapping, reviewer first-impression risks, matplotlib/seaborn or ggplot2 figure code, SVG/PDF/TIFF/PNG export, Illustrator/Inkscape/PowerPoint/Figma finishing plans, or IEEE-style engineering evidence graphics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after completing an analysis or before reporting a finding, to have a skeptical reviewer attack the conclusion before you believe it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs to design an interview process, create interview questions, build scorecards, calibrate interviewers, or evaluate candidates for a role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package a finished piece of work (spec, prototype, implementation notes) into a single document that gets reviewers to understanding and approval fast. Use when the user needs buy-in, a review, or a shareable summary of what was built and why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin対応のコードレビュー自動化スキル。 PRの複雑度・リスク分析、SOLID違反・コードスメルの検出、レビューレポート生成。 「コードレビューして」「PRを分析」「コード品質チェック」「レビューレポート」等のリクエストで発動。

Reviews pitch decks and investor presentations. Reads slide content, evaluates narrative flow, problem/solution clarity, market sizing, competitive positioning, financial projections, team credibility, and ask clarity. Generates a scored pitch-review.md with slide-by-slide feedback, overall score, top improvements, investor objection predictions, and comparisons to successful decks. Use when reviewing fundraising materials, investor decks, or pitch presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pull requests for code quality, security issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes, or analyzing diffs before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a deep code review of files, modules, a diff, or a branch - finding security vulnerabilities (mapped to OWASP Top 10:2025), correctness bugs, performance problems, and maintainability issues - and returns severity-ranked findings with evidence and concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or sanity-check code, asks "is this safe", "what's wrong with this", "find bugs", or wants a security or performance pass before shipping. For posting line comments on a GitHub pull request, use git-pr-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a manuscript comes back with reviewer or editor comments. Numbers every comment, classifies it MAJOR/MINOR/REBUTTAL, drafts a point-by-point response with tracked manuscript changes, routes new analyses to /analyze-stats and writes the cover letter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a manuscript or response-to-reviewers letter reads as AI-written. Scans for 27 AI writing patterns and rewrites flagged passages, preserving technical accuracy and bounding how much text changes. Not general copy-editing; that is /polish-language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection. Plans the arms, decoupled rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes, reviewer panel, inter-rater reliability targets and LLM-as-judge versus human adjudication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes official 3D Gaussian Splatting setup, data preparation, training, rendering, evaluation, and viewer workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ARIS, the Auto Research in Sleep skill-based research harness, for setup, workflow routing, reviewer backend integration, state recovery, experiment operations, and repository maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when to delegate to Honey's read-only subagents (hive-scout, hive-reviewer) instead of working inline, so the expensive tokens — large file reads and review passes injected back into the orchestrator's context — come back compressed (Honey Lever 3). Use when a task is search-heavy or review-heavy, spans many files, or you want to keep the orchestrator's context small. Not for trivial one-file work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when polishing, diagnosing, tailoring, or exporting resumes for LLM, RAG, Agent, Agentic RL, post-training, pretraining, AIGC, search/ranking, multimodal, AI backend, or LLM algorithm internships from raw resume text, a materials folder, and/or a target job description. Audits evidence, maps JD fit, enforces truth boundaries, writes polished and targeted resumes, generates interviewer-style grilling questions, answer cards, evidence-upgrade plans, and optional open-source project recommendations without fabricating experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

检查并修复短视频逐字稿的段落衔接、信息密度、口播节奏和观众流失风险。用户问稿子顺不顺、哪里容易被划走，或需要制作可直接拍摄的版本和标记式改稿时使用。 English: Check and improve short-video scripts for transitions, information density, spoken rhythm, and audience drop-off risk. Use when the user wants to know where viewers may leave, whether the script flows, or needs a shoot-ready or annotated revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit preparation register: required document, period covered, request and receipt dates, preparer and reviewer, auditor queries and adjustments. Use for assembling an audit file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Algorithmic philosophies are computational aesthetic movements that are then expressed through code. Output .md files (philosophy), .html files (interactive viewer), and .js files (generative algorithms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。