「repo」の検索結果

Apply evidence-first engineering discipline to any agent-built software project: fact discovery before action, evidence-calibrated status reporting, explicit change boundaries and stage gates, controlled confirmation for risky or external actions, sensitive-information redaction for anything shared publicly, and resumable continuity after interruptions. Use when users ask an agent to take over an existing codebase, deliver a feature across stages, verify whether work is actually complete, judge release readiness, or keep conclusions honest about what is proven versus assumed. This foundation skill is domain-neutral; vertical suites (for example mini-program engineering) build on it by adding domain facts and platform rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a confirmed mini-program product specification or bounded feature into an implementable architecture covering modules, pages, components, services, canonical state sources, data models, interfaces, permissions, failures, caching, concurrency, idempotency, migration, rollback, external dependencies, and architecture decision records. Use when users ask how to structure a mini program, design data or APIs, divide frontend and cloud responsibilities, evolve an existing system safely, or prepare implementation after product semantics are stable. Preserves product meaning, current repository constraints, user-owned changes, and verifiable acceptance behavior rather than redesigning the product for technical convenience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when reviewing statistical analysis, experiments, model evaluation, or ML work done by someone else (a notebook, PR, or report) — checking that the required context is stated and that every method applied comes with the figures and values required by the matching *-diagnostics skill. When running an analysis yourself, apply the matching *-diagnostics skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when creating, modifying, reviewing, or saving charts, figures, plots, or visual summaries — including matplotlib/seaborn code, EDA figures, report figures, dashboards, or any task involving Japanese chart labels, color palettes, or figure styling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code CLI second opinion for non-Claude Code hosts. Review a diff, challenge a change for failure modes, or consult Claude with read-only repo access and session continuity. Use for "claude review", "claude challenge", "ask claude", or an explicit Claude Code second opinion. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a writing scaffold teaching the genre conventions specific to an academic discipline. Use when students write lab reports, historical essays, or other discipline-specific text types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or fix a profile.yml — pick the right resource kind for each file, bind operating references, and verify the install layout before publishing. Use when creating a ForgeCat profile, adding a skill/agent/rule/hook to one, or when `forgecat validate` or `plan` reports something unexpected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate time-windowed product pulse reports from configured signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a git commit with a clear, value-communication message. Use when the user asks to commit/save staged or unstaged changes with a repo-appropriate, value-communicating message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use before PRs or when asked for review; interactive mode can fix locally, while mode:agent reports only for pipeline callers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check Compound Engineering health and repo-local config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the evals of a BMad skill through the agent harness the user works in and reports what they show: baseline against the bare model, variant against a stripped or prior version, quality against a rubric, and trigger accuracy of the description with an optional optimization loop. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, test the triggers of, grade, or compare versions of a skill, or when the bmad-toolsmith skill asks for an eval of a skill it built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the decisions in .ank/ against the current code and report what no longer holds. Use when asked whether ADRs, specs, or tasks are still accurate, after a milestone, or when the corpus and the code seem to disagree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview a goal into decisions and tasks recorded in .ank/. Use when someone brings a feature, change, or problem to plan before implementation in a repository with a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive an implementation test-first, red before green, against a claimed task's frozen criterion. Use when implementing a task in a repository with a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work a defect back to its cause before changing anything, and close it with a regression test. Use when a claimed task's criterion names a defect in a repository with a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate several ank agents in parallel, each on its own task, worktree and branch. Use only inside a herdr pane, when asked to fan ank tasks out across agents in a repository with a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work through the open tasks in .ank/ without supervision, one claim at a time. Use when asked to work the backlog, chain tasks, or run autonomously in a repository with a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Session state backend for WDS. Called by wrap, start, and handoff tools — never directly by users. Writes to progress/ in the project repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。